Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: House GOP proposes changes to ‘food stamp’ program
Explainer: House GOP proposes changes to ‘food stamp’ program
Feb 11, 2026 8:17 AM

What just happened?

Last week the House Agriculture Committee introduced the Agriculture and Nutrition Act of 2018, monly known as the Farm Bill. The new Farm Bill makes significant changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the “largest program in the domestic hunger safety net.”

What is SNAP?

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is a federal welfare program that provides nutritional support for low-wage working families, e seniors, and people with disabilities living on fixed es.

This program, which was formerly known as the Food Stamp Program, is used by more than 40 million Americans. SNAP benefits are provided monthly via an electronic debit card, and are available to most households with gross e less than 130 percent of the Federal poverty guidelines.

In fiscal year 2017, the federal government spent about $70 billion on SNAP and other food assistance programs. Ninety-three percent of SNAP spending went directly to benefits that households used to purchase food, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. The monthly SNAP benefits average $125.80 per person.

What role do the individual states have in SNAP?

SNAP is a federal program and the broad policy guidance is provided through USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS). States or counties, though, carry out the day-to-day administration of the program. States are also responsible for the certification of households and issuance of benefits.

What changes to SNAP are being proposed in the new Farm Bill?

The main change is to implement the GOP’s goal of improving workforce development. The goal is to shift “the antipoverty conversation from one purely focused on benefits to one focused on helping someone climb the economic ladder.”

Currently, SNAPrules require all recipients tomeet work requirementsunless they are exempt because of age, disability, or another specific exempt reason.Since the welfare reform changes first implemented in 1996,SNAPhas had a time limit for able-bodied adults between the ages of 18 and 49 who do not have dependents (what the program refers to as an “ABAWD”). An ABAWD can only getSNAPfor three monthsin three yearsif they do not meet certain special work requirements. To be eligible beyond the time limit, the ABAWD must work at least 80 hours per month, participate in qualifying education and training activities at least 80 hours per month, ply with a workfare program (i.e., unpaid work through a special state-approved program).

The new change would stop treating ABAWDs as a separate population from other work-capable adults. A new, single work standard would apply to adults ages 18 to 59, requiring 20 hours per week of participation in bination of work, a work program, or participation in SNAP education and training program. Any work-capable, non-exempt SNAP beneficiary who wants to receive training will be guaranteed a federally-funded spot in a SNAP education and training program.

Who will be affected by the changes?

Almost two-thirds of all SNAP participants are in a primary exempt category: children, seniors age 60 and older, and those with disabilities. States will also maintain the authority to waive the requirement for individuals facing temporary obstacles, and geographic waivers will still be given for areas with high rates of unemployment.

Overall, about seven million adults will be subject to the new rules, according to Republican House staff.

When would the changes take effect? And what happens if the states’s ply?

The legislation would give states a two-year transition period to implement the changes. After the transition period, states would need to meet the minimum services requirement and provide education and training services to all nonexempt

SNAP participants subject to the work requirement. If they do not, the state is subject to warnings, suspensions, and/or a disallowance of administrative funds. A state’s inability to offer a spot does promise an individual’s eligibility for SNAP.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Who Really Cares for the Poor?
Syracuse University professor Arthur Brooks challenges perceived mainstream social orthodoxy in his new book, Who Really Cares: America’s Charity Divide – Who Gives, Who Doesn’t and Why It Matters. For generations it has been assumed that political and social liberals are generous towards the poor while conservatives are proverbial tightwads. At least since the days of Charles Dickens’ Scrooge this has been the popular view. Liberals continually remind us that they are the ones who really care about welfare since...
2007
To all of our faithful Powerblog readers, I’d like to take this opportunity to wish you a happy, prosperous, and blessed new year! (And while I’m at it, I claim for myself the mantle of “First Poster of 2007,” which I believe should entitle me to some sort of cash prize…) ...
Movie Review: An Inconvenient Truth
Several weeks ago now I was offered a review copy of Gore’s Inconvenient Truth. After watching it on a cross-country flight in November I elected to let Gore’s expos’e sink in a bit before I pasted my thoughts more or less permanently on the web. Thanks in advance to Rachel Guthermann of Special Ops Media for being patient with me on posting the review. It’s probably fitting to end the year with a nod to this influential movie; it’s pelling...
Single-payer Schemes=Supply Shortages
Go to this page to watch a short video highlighting the story of one man’s fight against Canada’s health system. The film is focused on the defects of socialized medicine and so, naturally, does not deal with the serious problems existing in other systems (such as the United States). But it is an effective display of a problem that every attempt to manipulate prices encounters: how to make supply meet demand. ...
2006 in Review, 3rd Quarter
Our series on the year in review continues with the third fourth of 2006: July “Isn’t the Cold War Over?” David Michael Phelps I’ve got an idea for a new . Titled, Hugo and Vladi, it details the zany adventures of two world leaders, one of whom (played by David Hyde Pierce) struggles to upkeep his image of a friendly, modern European diplomat while his goofball brother-in-law (played by George Lopez) keeps screwing it up for him by spouting off...
Remembering Gerald Ford
The Acton Institute’s offices are right across the Grand River from the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum (and what will be Ford’s final resting place). Having passed these sites every day for several years on my walk to work, news of the ex-president’s death was especially poignant. National Review Online offers an interesting symposium on Ford’s presidency and legacy. From the other side of the ideological divide, Newsweek provides several retrospective pieces. A striking thing about Ford that I hadn’t...
2006 in Review, 4th Quarter
Our 2006 year in review series concludes with the fourth quarter: October “Do You See More than Just a ‘Carbon Footprint’?” Jordan J. Ballor It’s a fair question to ask, I think, of those who are a part of the radical environmentalist/population control political lobby. It’s also a note of caution to fellow Christians who want to build bridges with those folks…there is plex of interrelated policies that are logically consistent once you assume the tenets of secular environmentalism…. November...
Merry Christmas(*)
I have just returned from a week of holiday rest, and began tackling my 250 lb. email inbox. Flipping through a number of Christmas greetings and Fruitcake (Xmas spam), I came across a quick message from a dear friend, an email of the sort where the message is in the subject line, and the text is left empty (save mon signatures or disclaimers). My friend is a lawyer, I respect him very much, but I had to laugh at how...
Never a Countdown on Effective Compassion
The “10 years after welfare reform” articles of this past summer are old news, of course. Not surprisingly, indications were that, like any public policy, reform hadn’t been the all-time poverty solution, but that policies had, in fact, helped a significant number of people to move themselves to self-sufficiency. A recent Wall Street Journal series highlighted the broad range of issues related to moving out of poverty. panion piece to the December 28 entry, “Economists Are Putting Theories to Scientific...
Poor Kids in America are Fat
A new study finds that children growing up in poverty in America are disproportionately more likely to be pared to other e groups (HT: God’s Politics). So, poor kids in the US are fat…and in this they are just like the rest of America: “The whole country is struggling with this,” said Virginia Chomitz , senior scientist at the Institute for Community Health at the Cambridge Health Alliance . “There’s a lot of factors in our environment and our lifestyle...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved