Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Ender’s Game: What Does the Formic Say?
Ender’s Game: What Does the Formic Say?
Jul 8, 2026 2:27 AM

Over at Think Christian, I take another look at Ender’s Game, focusing on the leitmotif of understanding munication in Orson Scott Card’s work. This applies particularly to munication.

We might, in fact, riffing off the Norwegian parody pop song, say that the central question of Ender’s Game is, “What does the Formic say?” Ender is the only one with the genuine curiosity to find out, and doing so is how he moves beyond his bloody calling.

What we find out, in a sense, is that on the Formic understanding, each human being has the dignity and worth of a queen. We are all queens, or as the Bible puts it, made in the image and likeness of God. This reality es all the more salient when like the Formic queen, “dynamite with a laser beam,” we too are killer queens,to make another pop culture connection (HT: Dylan Pahman).

A key difference between the film and the book is that the film is pretty thin on answers to that question of munication. There is much more about what the Formics think and feel in the book. I’ll post some of the relevant sections, which include significant spoilers, below the break. If you have not seen the film, you should not read these sections!

But for those of you who have seen the film, just think about that question of understanding the Formics as you revel in “The Fox (What Does it Say?)”

SPOILERS:

In the book, Ender is finally able municate with the queen. This is alluded to in the film, but the content of munication is left generally undefined.

What the municates to Ender is shocking: “We did not mean to murder, and when we understood, we never came again.” A society like ours, in which every individual has irreducible dignity and value, and which has a measure of independence and responsibility, was inconceivable to them. So not understanding what they were doing, they killed tens of millions of human beings in what to them seemed to be a minor skirmish. It was only when human beings successfully killed one of the Formic queens that the recognition sunk in that what was happening was not an amoral skirmish between replaceable drones, but rather that the Formics had been killing untold numbers of unique individuals.

As Mazer Rackham, who leads the humans to victory in the previous war with the Formics, tells it, “it’s as if they really couldn’t believe, until it was too late, that I would actually kill the queen. Maybe in their world, queens are never killed, only captured, only checkmated. I did something they didn’t think an enemy would ever do.” But when Ender es to understand what was really going on in the war with the Formics, for them “only queen-killing, really, is murder, because only queen-killing closes off a genetic path.”

And as the dying Formic municates to Ender, their guilt at killing humans turns to resignation: “They did not forgive us, she thought. We will surely die.” And it is at this understanding that the transition from vengeance to forgiveness in es pletion.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Radio Free Acton: Daniel Mahoney on the Bolshevik Revolution; Upstream on Blade Runner 2049
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, John Couretas, Director of Communications at the Acton Institute, speaks with Daniel J. Mahoney, Professor of Political Science at Assumption College, on the 100th anniversary of the Bolshevik Revolution. Then, on the Upstream segment, Bruce Edward Walker and Daniel Menjivar talk about Blade Runner 2049. Check out these additional resources on this week’s podcast topics: “The Gulag Archipelago” by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn “Judging Communism and All Its Works: Solzhenitsyn’s The Gulag Archipelago Reconsidered” Video:...
Does bundling benefit social welfare?
Note: This is post #53 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Bundling refers to when two or more goods are sold together as a package. Cable TV is a prime example of bundling. What if there was no bundling and you had to pay for Cable TV by channel rather than purchasing channels in bundles? Would you end up paying more or less? In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok explains the benefits of bundling....
How close are we to ending extreme poverty?
Today is the 25th anniversary of the declaration by the UN General Assembly designating October 17 as the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty. The World Bank defines extreme poverty as living on less than $1.90 per person per day. How close are we to eliminating that level of poverty? Closer than you may think. From the beginning of human history until about 1970, there were more people living in extreme poverty than people who were not. But around...
An evangelical manifesto on wealth creation
Earlier this year two evangelical groups, the Lausanne Movement and BAM Global, met in Thailand to “discussvarious aspects of wealth creation, including justice, poverty, Biblical foundation, wealth creators, stewardship of creation and the role of the church.” During the meeting 30 peoplefrom 20 nations, primarily from the business world, and also from church, missions and academia, put together theWealth Creation Manifesto: Affirmations 1. Wealth creation is rooted in God the Creator, who created a world that flourishes with abundance and...
Christian education is not safe
“Each generation needs to re-own the rationale for Christian education,” says philosopher James K.A. Smith, “to ask ourselves ‘Why did we do this?’ and ‘Should we keep doing this?’” In answering such questions, Smith notes, “it might be helpful to point out what Christian education is not”: First, Christian education is not meant to be merely “safe” education. The impetus for Christian schooling is not a protectionist concern, driven by fear, to sequester children from the big, bad world. Christian...
Economic man is a myth, but ‘nudging’ is a distraction
The University of Chicago’s Richard Thaler recently won the Nobel Prize for his contributions in behavioral economics, much of which centers on challenging rational choice theory. “Renowned for his use of data to observe and predict how people behave in the real world,” writes Derek Thompson, “Thaler’s career has been a lifelong war on Homo economicus, that mythical species of purely rational hominids who dwell exclusively in the models of classical economic theory.” Victor Claar has helpfully summarized Thaler’s work...
Sin taxes: The ‘nudge’ that benefits terrorism
Richard Thaler won the Nobel Prize for describe how even small economic incentives can affect behavior. One of those nudges, high “sin taxes,” has helped finance terrorism and organized crime. Sin taxes played some role in his winning the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences this week. The Nobel Committee that awarded Thaler’s prize in economics noted, “The insights of behavioral economics can also be used to inform more traditional policy interventions, for example the taxation of ‘sinful goods,’” adding...
A stamp for Che? Guevara ignored economics and human nature
At a minimum, one may see the West’s disconnect from economics reflected in Che Guevara’s immortalized visage, which adorns everything from college dorm rooms to a new stamp issued by the Republic of Ireland. (You can see a picture of the honor here.) The most familiar image of Guevara, who was born in Argentina to a father of part-Irish ancestry, entered the public canon through the hand of Irish artist Jim Fitzpatrick. The Irish post office chose to fete Guevara,...
Protectionism is economic suicide
The most charitable assumption you can make about people who support tariffs and other forms of protectionism is that they are economically illiterate. But if they are able to demonstrate they understand the economics of protectionism and still support such policies, then we are justified in assuming they don’t care about harming their neighbor. This binary choice may sound overly simplistic—after all, aren’t most policy plex?—but it really is that clear-cut. As Mark J. Perry explains, It’s a scientifically and...
Samuel Gregg: Ideas, intellectuals and the free economy
In another round of conservative debate on the virtues — or vices — of the market economy, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg published a new piece at Public Discourse in which he takes on the critiques of writer Matthew McManus. MacManus’ criticisms were written in reply to an earlier piece in which Gregg addresses the growing criticisms of a free economy by editors and writers at First Things magazine. In Gregg’s article, Capitalism, Conservatives, and the Intellectuals: A Reply to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved