Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Does social media compromise free will?
Does social media compromise free will?
Aug 16, 2026 8:06 AM

In an article for Law and Liberty, Michael Matheson Miller, a research fellow at the Acton Institute, reflects on the book “10 Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now.” Written by Jaron Lanier, a “technologist and musician”, “10 Arguments” shares thought-provoking ideas about the dangers and risks involved with social media.

“It’s worth noting that Lanier is not anti-technology,” Miller writes. Working panies like Atari and Microsoft, Lanier has devoted much of his life to the tech industry.

Miller shares how, interestingly enough, Lanier’s life-long career in technology has not made him a supporter of social media but rather quite the opposite. “Lanier believes that social media panies like Facebook and Google are practicing behavior modification that harms the individual and society and undermines economic dignity,” notes Miller.

Lanier condemns the ability of social media sites to monitor user actions. Miller notes, “Through algorithms that monitor our behavior and activities, Google and other free social media are changing our behavior without our even knowing it.” With “advertisers…watching us,” rather than consumers simply viewing advertisements, there are many negative implications, including to “undermine free will”.

Lanier focuses heavily on the idea of “free” social media and the merits of profit, Miller points out. “Everything is supposed to be free,” postulates Lanier, “but everything is also supposed to be about hero entrepreneurs, and entrepreneurs make money.” The “free, open source model”, Lanier notes, “has actually merce and created a situation where all the money goes up to the top.”

Lanier and George Gilder, author of “Life After Google,” proclaim the “social benefit of profit”, whereas there is “a widespread view of profit as something negative and harmful for society.”

“With Facebook and Google we get spying, data-mining, manipulation, and a faux morality of ‘Don’t Be Evil’” writes Miller. However, “paid transactions are real social interactions with claims and obligations” that “constitute a type of social capital that is important for society.”

Miller summarizes Lanier’s argument that argues for merce and more transactions.”

At the end of his review Miller advises readers who decide to delete their social media accounts: “If you do read Lanier’s book and it convinces you to delete your accounts, at least share this essay post before you log off.”

Read Miller’s full book review here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
An Alternative Stimulus
Washington is all atwitter about the “Stimulus,” which is currently being pushed through Congress (without being read by most members). Acton’s own Michelle Muccio e up with a plan of her own, and did a bit of independent research to see if her proposal would find any support: ...
Acton Commentary: Choosing a Prosperous Future
“Focusing on education is not a distraction from the pressing business of economic recovery,” Kevin Schmiesing writes. “It is vital to ensuring it.” This focus should advance school choice and a reduction of administrative red tape. Read mentary at the Acton website, and share ments below. ...
PBR: Public Good and the Faith-Based Initiative
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” I have little confidence in the future of the faith-based initiative because conservatives who gain office are unwilling to take any fire at all in order to advance the cause beyond concept. At the same time, liberals will be unable to make productive use of the idea because of giant fissures regarding public religion in their movement. In theory, President Obama would make an ideal person to...
PBR: On Faith
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Perhaps taking a cue from this week’s PBR question (or perhaps not), the On Faith roster of bloggers have been asked to weigh in on the following question this week: “Should the Obama Administration let faith-based programs that receive government grants discriminate against those they hire or serve?” Notable responses include those from Chuck Colson, Al Mohler, and Susan Brooks Thistlewaite, the latter of whom has these...
An Economic Recovery for the Religious Left
Mark Tooley calls out “emerging church maestro” Brian Mclaren in a piece today in The American Spectator titled “A Real ‘Economic’ Recovery.” I was introduced to Brian McLaren in seminary when new students were required to read his books in introductory classes. Unfortunately, I was one of only a handful not impressed. He also lectured in person to a class I took, but honestly I don’t remember much about the lecture, except conservatives were generally denounced and “big oil” was...
Roepke was right
In my Winter 2007 article on economic globalization for AGAIN Magazine, I quoted economist Wilhelm Roepke. (AGAIN is published by Conciliar Media Ministries, a department of the Antiochian Orthodox Christian Church of North America). Roepke: Economically ignorant moralism is as objectionable as morally callous economism. Ethics and economics are two equally difficult subjects, and while the former needs discerning and expert reason, the latter cannot do without humane values. In light of all that has happened with the U.S. economic...
Kaarlgard Declares ‘Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism’
In a Forbes blog post titled “Failure of Morality, Not Capitalism,” Rich Kaarlgard counters the critics of supply-side capitalism by pointing to an absence of morality. Kaarlgard declares: Many people do blame capitalism for bringing us to this low moment in the economy. Do they have a point? They do if capitalism, as they define it, is devoid of any underlying morality. True enough, it is hard to see any underlying morality when one surveys the present carnage caused by...
The Buckleyization of America
William F. Buckley, 1956: [I’d] sooner be governed by the first two thousand people in the Boston telephone directory than by the two thousand members of the faculty of Harvard University. Rassmussen poll results, 2009: Forty-four percent (44%) voters also think a group of people selected at random from the phone book would do a better job addressing the nation’s problems than the current Congress, but 37% disagree. Twenty percent (20%) are undecided. ...
Acton Commentary: Race Alarmists Hijack Black History Month
Ignore those racial disparity studies that point to the “resegregation” of America’s educational system. They advance the lie that minorities cannot survive without whites. “What is best for e black and Latino students is what is best for all students: stable and supportive families, parental options, and high achieving schools with stellar teachers,” Bradley writes. Read mentary at the Acton website, and then discuss it here. ...
PBR: A Mainline Bailout
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Under the Obama administration, the faith-based initiative will increasingly e a means to bailout flagging mainline and liberal denominations and ministries, who will have no problem modating their religious practices to secular standards. And in this we will see even clearer manifestation of the theocratic hopes of the religious left. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved