Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Did Domino’s exploit you by selling $30 pizzas on New Year’s Eve in Times Square?
Did Domino’s exploit you by selling $30 pizzas on New Year’s Eve in Times Square?
May 14, 2026 4:55 AM

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio began 2020, the year he intended to e president, by asserting that Domino’s Pizza “exploited” New Year’s Eve revelers in Times Square by selling pizzas for $30 apiece. But was the mayor’s hot take on the extra dough fresh?

In his first original tweet of the year, Mayor de Blasio referred to a New York Post story about this franchise’s 15-year-old tradition of delivering pizzas to the crowd. “Jacking up your prices on people trying to celebrate the holidays?” he wrote. “Classy, @dominos.”

“To the thousands who came to Times Square last night to ring in 2020, I’m sorry this corporate chain exploited you,” he continued. “[S]tick it to them by patronizing one of our fantastic LOCAL pizzerias.”

Jacking up your prices on people trying to celebrate the holidays? Classy, @dominos.

To the thousands who came to Times Square last night to ring in 2020, I’m sorry this corporate chain exploited you — stick it to them by patronizing one of our fantastic LOCAL pizzerias. /rO6I9oYIku

— Mayor Bill de Blasio (@NYCMayor) January 1, 2020

One might object that New York City, which is currently gripped in an epidemic of anti-Semitic violence, has weightier problems to address. But given that Hizzoner chose to address this issue, is he right?

A host of people on Twitter pointed out the law of supply-and-demand: As demand for a finite product rises, its price rises to meet it. Hundreds of thousands of partiers, with no access to food or drinks, create a human wave of demand. Prices in crowds always rise, as customers outbid one another.

To simply dismiss Bill de Blasio’s tweet on the grounds of supply and demand would overlook all the other ways the mayor’s charges fall flat on the facts. Mayor de Blasio’s attack is based on a number of hypocrisies richer than Domino’s sauce.

1. The customers were grateful. Prices transmit a vital piece of information: the value consumers place on a product. Plenty of people would be happier with a hot pizza pie than with an extra $30 and an empty stomach. (Esau had a similar values dilemma when he sold his birthright to Jacob for a bowl of pottage.) Profit is a form of gratitude for services rendered, as Domino’s satisfied customers told the Post. The delivery man “is our Santa,” said Amit Zanwar,a 31-year-old who came to the celebration with two friends and no food. Francisco Patalano, who visited from Fort Polk in Louisiana, said, “It was totally worth it.” Government may think it knows best, but free choices, made by free individuals, deliver the best results for everyone involved.

2. The government created the extraordinary conditions that fed this demand. Someone who wishes to enter the wall of humanity that is Times Square on New Year’s Eve es subject to a number of regulations. As part of the necessary security measures to secure an inviting terrorist target, officials screen attendees and assign them to a pen. They can leave, but they cannot return. Attendees willingly lose access to nutrition, hydration, and restroom facilities. While this is sadly necessary in an age of terror, it stokes demand. Further, the government must close surrounding streets, so Domino’s delivery man Ratan Banik had to balance a stack of hot pizzas on his head as he walked into crowd, selling his wares. Does the mayor believe the restaurant deserves nothing for going above-and-beyond to feed customers on a holiday?

3. The critique is motivated by envy, not moral outrage. Moral integrity demands that all people be held to the same standard. Yet as de Blasio inveighs against evil corporations, those on the ground would be treated no better by the screaming-caps “LOCAL” pizzerias he extols. “[M]any city pizzerias charge $4 a slice — which works out to $32 for a pie — and that restaurants regularly raise their rates on New Year’s Eve,” the Post reports. That is, the “corporation” charged the same prices as its rivals. Demeaning one business while praising petitors, who are engaged in identical practices, shows de Blasio is motivated by animus, not moral integrity.

4. Private consumers have the right to choose, or reject, the price. Domino’s cannot force people to purchase a product they do not want – unlike, e.g., health panies under the original Affordable Care Act. Which brings us to the next item ….

5. Bill de Blasio understands – and advocates – raising fees based on demand. Mayor de Blasio has endorsed Governor Andrew Cuomo’s scheme of “congestion pricing” for traffic: Beginning next year, the government will charge cars $12 to $14, and trucks $25, to enter Manhattan’s business district – the very area in question. “Congestion” is another word for “increased demand,” and de Blasio is “jacking up your prices” by imposing a draconian daily fee on those who want access to the limited supply of public streets. “Physician, heal thyself.”

6. The government often gives the people an undesirable product. Government alone has the power of coercion. The NYC government not only extracts people’s wealth by force but spends it on a variety of programs many of those people do not want. (“Now do property taxes,” one Twitter user responded.) Bill de Blasio’s approval rating sits at a dismal 27 percent. Government, unlike the free pels people to pay, but the policies are increasingly drawn up by a remote bureaucracy staffed by technocrats with little incentive to please those paying the tab.

7. Franchises are “local pizzerias.” Mayor de Blasio’s attempt to stir up populist backlash against giant corporations fails, because he does not understand that every Domino’s franchise is locally owned by his constituents. Although the franchise model of business came under fire during the Obama administration, the present National Labor Relations Board understands distant corporations do not own local stores. Franchisees, including the owners of the Domino’s on 40th Street and 7th Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, are hardworking entrepreneurs running their own business. And now, they must counter the intervention of the highest government official in their city.

Luckily for Domino’s, if this were a real crime, they could now be released without bail, to serve the public again and again.

Cologne / . Editorial use only.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Ecology, Theophany, and Economics
Last Friday, January 6, marked the Orthodox Christian feast of Theophany (Epiphany in the West). memorates the baptism of Jesus Christ by John in the Jordan river, the manifestation of the Trinity to those present, and the sanctification of the waters through their contact with God incarnate. Every year this last aspect of the feast stands as a reminder of the Christian viewpoint of God’s concern for the world he created. Indeed, according to a hymn from the Great Blessing...
Review: Blue Collar Intellectuals
“Stupid is the new smart,” and “Pop culture is a wasteland” are just a few lines from Daniel J. Flynn’s introduction to Blue Collar Intellectuals: When the Enlightened and the Everyman Elevated America. Certainly, one does not need to read Flynn’s account to surmise that there are grave problems with our culture. But many would miss some great stories and a return to a people and time that crafted a great uplifting for mass audiences. Flynn has profiled six intellectuals...
Samuel Gregg: The Problem with Compassionate Conservatism
On National Review Online, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg reacts to musings by conservative writers David Brooks and Michael Gerson about Rick Santorum’s political rise in the GOP primaries and how his social views might be expressed in government policy. Would a President Santorum usher in a smaller but more “transformational” role for the state in addressing social ills? Gregg: On the one hand, passionate conservatives understand there is no such thing as morally neutral laws or morally indifferent government...
Ministries of Common and Special Grace
Should the President of the United States be seen as theologian-in-chief? That might be one way to understand Bryan Fischer’s claim that “we are in fact choosing a minister when we select a president.” I explore some of the dimensions of understanding politicians as “ministers of God” in this week’s Acton Commentary, “Ministers of Common Grace.” It strikes me that those who seek salvation from politicians are making a significant category mistake. Politicians cannot save because politics cannot save. Politics...
Analysis: Catholic Charities of Tulsa Rejects Government Funding
Acton President Rev. Robert A. Sirico and Research Director Samuel Gregg were interviewed for a article about a decision by Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Tulsa to rely strictly on private donations for its work. Reporter Ben Johnson observed that the policy shift “stands in stark contrast to most of the benevolent institution’s other affiliates. Catholic Charities around the country received $1 billion from the government, approximately two-thirds of their funding.” Johnson: Some critics believe only foregoing government funds...
Audio: Jordan Ballor on Christian Responses to Occupy Wall Street
Jordan Ballor is a busy man. He serves as a research fellow here at Acton, as well as being the executive editor of the Journal of Markets & Morality. As if those duties don’t keep him busy enough, he also finds time to do the occasional radio interview, in this case on 101.5 WORD FM in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, discussing how Christians should react to the Occupy Wall Street movement. For some additional perspectives on the issue, check out this Think...
Samuel Gregg: Santorum, Tocqueville, and the Economy
On the National Catholic Register, Kathryn Jean Lopez takes a look at the strong finish by Rick Santorum in the Iowa Caucuses. She writes that the candidate’s dead heat finish with Mitt Romney marks “the emergence of a different kind of Catholic candidate in American politics, one who refuses to give up the fight on social justice — substantively and rhetorically — in practice and linguistics.” Lopez interviews Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg, who observes that “where Santorum adds something...
Faith and Food Trucks
In last week’s Acton Commentary, “Food Fights and Free Enterprise,” I take a look at the food truck phenomenon in US cities, sometimes called a “craze.” In panion blog post, “Food Trucks and First Steps,” I refer to Milton Friedman’s observation that there is a difference between being pro-market and pro-business. Art Carden has more on this over at Forbes. As I note in the piece, the fight over food trucks is not just the stuff of big cities. The...
I, iPhone
The latest episode of This American Life follows the story of Mike Daisey and his investigation into the origins of Apple products, especially the iPhone which is “Made in China.” What might the iPhone say if it could speak for itself? Ira Glass provides some answers to such a question in the opening moments of this episode, “Mr. Daisey and the Apple Factory.” It’s illuminating that Daisey half-jokingly describes his devotion to Apple products in religious terms (this doesn’t prevent...
Ministry, Service, and Stewardship in Biblical Perspective
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Ministers of Common Grace,” I note that in addition to ministry, “Another scriptural term, that of stewardship, can helpfully describe the pluriformity of God’s grace, both special mon: ‘Each of you should use whatever gift you have received to serve others, as faithful stewards of God’s grace in its various forms’ (1 Peter 4:10 NIV).” I conclude by calling for “better attention to the overlap and varieties of these biblical terms.” What I have primarily...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved