Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Departing in Peace: Economics and Liturgical Living
Departing in Peace: Economics and Liturgical Living
Oct 16, 2026 6:31 PM

In the most recent issue of Theosis (1.6), Fr. Thomas Loya, a Byzantine Catholic priest, iconographer, and columnist, has an interesting contribution on the ing feast of the Presentation of Christ at the Temple (also known as Candlemas or the “Meeting of the Lord”). For many, February 2nd is simply the most bizarre and meaningless American holiday: Groundhog Day. However, for more traditional Christians, this is a major Christian feast day: memoration of the forty day presentation of Christ at the Temple in Jerusalem (December 25 + 40 days = February 2; for the biblical account, see Luke 2:22-40).

In his installment on “Applied Byzantine Liturgy” (pp. 54-56), Loya writes regarding this feast that it, like all liturgy, transforms our vision and thereby ought to be “applied to every aspect of life.” He writes,

When we say, “applied to every aspect of life” we really, really meant it: the economy, the environment, politics, education, healthcare, marriage, family, sexuality, law, work, unions, management, etc, etc. Did you notice how many of the words in this last sentence were some of the “hot button” words of our day? Have you also noticed how none of the areas that these words denote is functioning well today? There is one reason—lack of the correct vision and the application of the correct vision.

He goes on ment on the meeting between Simeon, a “just and devout” old man, who was waiting for the Messiah, and the child Jesus:

Like Peter, James and John, on Mt. Tabor, like the Magi in Bethlehem or the Apostle Thomas in the upper room, Simeon is seeing through this God incarnate in human form, what it really means to be human. He has a clear vision of our glorious origins and of our even more glorious destiny. If this accurate view of the human person es our view (because we went to Church on this Feast Day and learned about this vision) then if we apply this vision to the hot button issues mentioned above the results will be better.

In the space of such a short article, however, he is not really able to explore any of these “hot button” issues in greater depth. Agreeing with his basic premise—that the liturgy of the Church gives us the correct vision of the human person and life by reorienting us toward Christ—I would like to explore some of the insights this feast has for our economic life today.

In the Gospel of Luke, poetry breaks forth from Simeon’s mouth when he holds the child Jesus in his arms:

Lord, now let your servant depart in peace,

According to your word;

For my eyes have seen your salvation

Which you have prepared before the face of all peoples,

A light to bring revelation to the Gentiles,

And the glory of your people Israel. (Luke 2:29-32)

The many hymns of the feast in the Eastern tradition describe the meeting in greater, even midrashic, detail. One vespers hymn of the feast by Andrew Pyros describes the meeting as follows:

Simeon now receives below in his earthly arms

the One Whom the ministers on high entreat with trembling.

He proclaims the union of God with mankind.

He sees the heavenly God as mortal Man.

He prepares to withdraw from earthly things,

and raises his cry in joy:

“Glory to You, Lord, for You have revealed to those in darkness

the Light that knows no evening!”

What is the vision, the paradigm shift, of this feast? When Simeon holds in his arms God incarnate, he proclaims first that parison nothing else in life matters (“let your servant depart in peace”) and second that therein lies our greatest hope (“to those in darkness” has been revealed “the Light that knows no evening”).

Furthermore, this meeting happens in obedience to mandments: “Now when the days of [Mary’s] purification according to the law of Moses pleted, they brought [Jesus] to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord (as it is written in the law of the Lord, ‘Every male who opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord’)” (Luke 2:22-23).

But how might this serve to transfigure our vision in the economic aspect of our lives?

It begins, I think, with a shift in perspective regarding life and death. Often we live as if death did not await us all. Indeed, it is through suchthrough “fear of death” that we so often are “subject to bondage” (see Hebrews 2:15). As the ascetic spiritual tradition of the Church constantly affirms, one of the most important perspectives we can have is to remember the day of our deaths; after all, it is one of the only certainties in life. In doing so, so long as we are looking to Christ, we see that all of our life, including our economic life—our production, distribution, and exchange—can be either tyrannized by purely material concerns, or transfigured by heavenly vision of hope that only the resurrected Christ can give.

In honorable work we produce not only products for bodily consumption but virtue, heavenly treasure, for our souls. In our distribution, that is, in the purpose for which we exchange the products or wages of our work, we broaden our interests to include mon good and the kingdom of God, especially hope for those who live in darkness. And in our exchanges themselves we remember that the goal is mutual benefit and service, shunning the immorality of monopolistic, one-sided, and petitive advantage, remembering that mandment, “You shall not steal” (Exodus 20:15), has broader implications than literal burglary.

Indeed, a life lived in this way, living out the liturgy of the Church in “every aspect of life,” looking to Christ as our model and source of true humanity, “our glorious origins and … our even more glorious destiny,” is a good step forward toward peace when the day of one’s departure arrives.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Gleaner Tech #1: Solar Bottle Lights in the Philippines
[Note: This is the first in an occasional series on gleaner technology.] In the Philippines, the cost of electricity often means poor citizens are left in the dark—even when the sun is shining. Social entrepreneur Illac Diaz e up with an indigenous and ingenious solution for lighting problems in the country’s e areas: He use plastic bottles, water, and chlorine to lighten up the dark homes of poor. The solution provides both a cheap source of lighting and environmentally friendly...
Biased in Favor of the Entrepreneur State
Yesterday I argued that since bias is inherent in institutions and neutrality between individual and social spheres is illusory we should harness and direct the bias of institutions towards a free and virtuous society characterized by individual liberty and sustained by religious principles. One of the ways we can do that in the economic realm, I believe, is to encourage a bias toward entrepreneurship and away from corporatism. As Derek Thompson, a senior editor at The Atlantic, says, “It would...
Madison on Religious Conscience
The HHS Mandate is troubling to so many simply because it’s a clear Constitutional violation. Any basic understanding of Constitutional rights and our religious freedom sees that this is primarily about religious liberty, and not solely an issue concerning contraceptives or Roman Catholics. Last week we heard from James Madison on religious liberty in my post “Religious Liberty or Government Tolerance?” In 1792, Madison wrote an essay titled “Property” in the National Gazette. This is a brilliant piece by Madison...
Samuel Gregg: Inequality Anyone?
Over at National Review Online, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg takes a look at a recent Charles Blow op-ed in the New York Times in which the writer hyperventilates about statements made by Rick Santorum on the subject of e inequality. Economically speaking, e inequality reflects the workings of several factors, many of which are essential if we want a dynamic, growing economy. Even your average neo-Keynesian economist will acknowledge that, without incentives (such as the prospect of a higher...
No Olympic Dream: Monti’s wake up call to Italy
On Valentine’s Day, just one day before having to tender its application to the International Olympic Committee in Lausanne, Switzerland, Italy’s pragmatic Prime Minister Mario Monti showed no romantic spirit by canceling his nation’s dream to host the 2020 Summer Olympics. In a last-minute decision made Feb. 14, Prime Minister Monti explained at a press conference that the already overburdened Italian taxpayers simply cannot afford to finance the estimated $12.5 billion to bring the 2020 Olympic Games to Rome. “I...
Politicians and the Pursuit of Happiness
In this week’s Acton Commentary I conclude, “The American people do not need politicians to tell them what happiness is and how it should be pursued.” I admit that I didn’t have this quote in mind (or I would have used it!), but Art Carden (follow him here and read him here) notes the following from Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations: What is the species of domestic industry which his capital can employ, and of which the produce is likely...
What does it mean to be On Call In Culture?
Most of us know what it feels like… this pull toward something. Whether it is art or science or writing or business—there is something inside you that says, “Yes, this is where I belong. This is what I was meant to do!” As Christians this realization e with a bit of disappointment mixed with the excitement of finding our place. We somehow wish that our calling were something of a more spiritual nature…something that mattered more. But here’s a question:...
Government and Gambling
Over at Mere Comments I note the recent invective against gambling leveled by Al Mohler and Russell Moore. I contend that as opposed to casinos, lotteries are in fact the most troubling example of state-sponsored gambling. And I also worry a bit about the use of legal means to prohibit gambling, as it isn’t so clear to me that gambling is always and in every case a moral evil. Thus, I write, that cultural rather than primarily political attempts to...
Gleaner Technology
Gleaning is the traditional Biblical practice of gathering crops that would otherwise be left in the fields to rot, or be plowed under after harvest. The biblical mandate for the es from Deuteronomy 24:19, When you reap your harvest in your field and forget a sheaf in the field, you shall not go back to get it. It shall be for the sojourner, the fatherless, and the widow, that the LORD your God may bless you in all the work...
Libertarians, Religious Conservatives, and the Myth of Social Neutrality
When es to our view of individual liberty, one of the most unexplored areas of distinction between libertarians and religious conservatives* is how we view neutrality and bias. Because the differences are uncharted, I have no way of describing the variance without resorting to a grossly simplistic caricature—so with a grossly simplistic caricature we shall proceed: Libertarians believe that neutrality between the various spheres of society—and especially betweenthe government and the individual—are both possible and desirable, and so the need...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved