Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Commentary: When Freedom, Creativity, and Opportunity Meet
Commentary: When Freedom, Creativity, and Opportunity Meet
Mar 28, 2026 3:16 PM

Anthony Bradley looks at the inspiring life story of Thomas L. Jennings (1791–1856) who was granted a patent, the first for an African American, for developing a process that led to modern-day dry cleaning. “Do we not want new stories like this in the United States and around the world?” asks Bradley. “Do we not want people to be free to use their creativity to meet marketplace needs in munities and freely use their wealth creation to contribute to civil society as they see fit?”The full text of his essay follows. Subscribe to the free, weekly Acton News & Commentary and other publicationshere.

When Freedom, Creativity, and Opportunity Meet

By Anthony Bradley

Thomas L. Jennings (1791–1856) was the first African-American to be granted a patent, for his discovery of a process called “dry-scouring” — what we now know as “dry cleaning.” Jennings’ life is a model of what happens when people of virtue have the freedom to use their skill to meet needs in the market place and contribute to mon good. What the United States and the rest of the world need are social, political, and economic contexts where people can flourish in the same way that Jennings did.

Jennings was born a free man soon after the state of New York banned the slave trade in 1788. In the ensuing years New York slowly began to expand the sphere of freedom for blacks, creating more opportunities for their participation in all levels of society. As a young man, Jennings dug trenches on Long Island during the War of 1812. After bouncing around from job to job, he finally landed an apprenticeship with a clothier, which set the stage for him to e an expert tailor. In fact, Jennings was so remarkably skilled that people from all over the New York City area e to him for alterations or custom-tailored items. The demand for his services was so great that, in his early 20s, he was able to open his own store on Church Street, which soon grew into one of the largest clothing stores in New York City during that era.

In the course of operating his business, Jennings became increasingly aware that many of his customers had few options for cleaning their clothes without damaging them. Conventional cleaning methods of the time would normally ruin the fabric, leaving owners with the unattractive options of wearing dirty clothes or disposing of the clothes after a few washes. After experimenting with different solutions and cleaning agents, Jennings found the bination to effectively treat and clean clothes without destroying the fabric. Jennings called this new method “dry-scouring.”

In 1820, Jennings applied for a patent. His application created substantial controversy, because a 1793 U.S. patent law prohibited slaves from receiving patents for their own inventions and thus no patent had ever been awarded to a black person. Since Jennings was born as a free man, however, the patent courts had no legal reason to prevent Jennings from receiving his patent, making him the first black to acquire one (March 3, 1821, U.S. patent 3306x).

Jennings’ contributions to society, however, do not end there. He used his earnings not only to improve his business but also to promote good social causes. For example, he spent much of his profit to purchase his family from slavery and to support the abolitionist movement. In 1831, Jennings became assistant secretary to the First Annual Convention of the People of Color in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and he spent many years fighting for the liberation of blacks. Jennings was neither coerced nor pressured by the rhetoric of “corporate social responsibility” nor “paying his fair share”; he simply did what was good for his customers and right for society because he was free to do so.

Do we not want new stories like this in the United States and around the world? Do we not want people to be free to use their creativity to meet marketplace needs in munities and freely use their wealth creation to contribute to civil society as they see fit? Ironically, if Jennings were alive today he would have had a much more difficult time succeeding because of the obstacles to innovation and philanthropy erected by ever-increasing federal regulations and ever-expanding government bureaucracy. As such, many burgeoning entrepreneurs are currently barred from capitalizing on opportunities to address market needs and to solve real problems in society because politicians believe they know how to meet the needs of society better than the rest of us.

Jennings is a wonderful example of what happens when political and economic liberty meet in virtue. Now if we could only get our politicians and regulators to get out of the way of the yet-to- be-discovered innovators like Jennings, we could all enjoy the benefits.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
When it comes to work-life balance, women know better than government
A series of governments across the West have crafted policies designed to help women achieve their goals. However, they failed to ask women what those goals might be. Economic interventions designed to nudge women into careers they don’t want, or to enter the workforce full-time even if they prefer to work in the home, uniquely disempower the women they are intended to help. Juan A. Soto, executive director of the Barcelona-based think tankFundación Arete, tackles the issue in a new...
What would life be like without free enterprise?
The Fund for American Studies has a superb It’s a Wonderful Life-style video about life without capitalism. The video not only shows what life would be like if we banned free enterprise (i.e., a lot like Soviet Russia) but also makes the point that when you lose economic freedom you lose other freedoms too. As the angel says, “When you take away the carrot, all you’re left with is the stick. My favorite part of the video: Anti-capitalist activist: “I...
No size or space in subsidiarity
When thinking and talking about principle of subsidiarity I’ve tended to resort to using metaphors of size and space (i.e.,nothing should be done by a higher orlargerorganization which can be done as well by a smalleror lower organization). But philosopher Brandon Watson explains why that is not really what subsidiarity is all about: The subsidiarity principle is often paired with the principle of solidarity, and there is a real connection between the two. Solidarity is the active sense of responsibility...
Do we have rights we can’t give away?
If inalienable rights are, as many people seem to believe, rights which the government cannot take away, does it follow that government can then take away rights that are alienable? As James Rogers explains, it is no less wrong for the government to take away an “alienable” right than it is for the government to take away an “inalienable” right. The difference between the two isn’t that one can be taken away while the other cannot but that an inalienable...
Do unions raise wages?
Note: This is post #59 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Do unions raise wages for workers as a whole? If not, can unions raise the wages of some workers? The answer, says economist Alex Tabarrok, is . . . it depends. Unions have the ability to restrict the supply of labor to a job, which can increase wages for some workers. However, unions can also lower wages. For example, work stoppages and strikes supported by unions can...
Video: Globalization, Justice, and the Economy: The Jesuit Contribution
In the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth centuries, Catholic theologians, many of whom were members of the Society of Jesus, studied the intersection of morality and merce. Jesuits includingJuan de Mariana, Luis de Molina, and Leonardus Lessius explored the ethics of money, economics, and trade.In his famousHistory of Economic Analysis, the distinguished economist and historian of economic ideas, Joseph Schumpeter, described many of these Jesuits’ insights as anticipating similar ideas expressed by Adam Smith two centuries later. The Jesuits contributed greatly...
Christian freedom isn’t about choice
As supporters of economic freedom, we frequently find ourselves in vigorous defense of personal choice, whether in business, trade, consumer goods, education, or otherwise. But while the elevation of economic choice is based on plenty of principle, not to mention historical and empirical analysis, we ought to be careful that our views about freedom aren’t confused or conflated in the process. Given our cultural appetite for turning choice into an idol above all else, it’s a risk we’d do well...
Rome conference on Jesuits, globalization reaps record attendance
On November 29 the Acton Institute filled the Pontifical Gregorian University’s aula magna to maximum capacity with at least 380 participants, a record attendance during Acton’s 17 years of academic programming in Rome. The international mix of students, professors, diplomats, journalists and lay professionals representing all continents came in droves for the afternoon conferenceGlobalization, Justice, and the Economy: The Jesuit Contribution which was co-sponsored by Acton and the Gregorian’s Faculty of History and Cultural Heritage of the Church. The discussion,...
What you need to know about the world’s youngest ruler
Sebastian Kurz made history when Austrian voters elected him the world’s youngest leader on October 15 at the age of 31. His ascent has been met with jubilation or trepidation across the transatlantic space. Some European media say paint him as dangerously far-Right. For instance, the satirical Titanic magazine in neighboring Germany, has repeatedly called Kurz “Baby Hitler” and depicted his assassination. On the other hand, the Catholic Herald of London dubbed Kurz “Europe’s Christian Chancellor.” Where does the young...
Brexit: Leaving EUtopia
History’s worst tyrannies began as attempts to create utopia. This longing to inaugurate the heavenly kingdom on earth – to “immanentize the eschaton,” in William F. Buckley Jr.’s memorable phrase – empowers politicians who promise peace and prosperity in exchange for power. The Brexit vote shattered one such imitation kingdom, according to Stephen F. Copp in an insightful and scholarly new essay for the Religion & Liberty Transatlantic website. “Brexit has profound implications for those who care about religion and...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved