Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Brazil needs a right-wing intellectual movement
Brazil needs a right-wing intellectual movement
Jul 3, 2026 6:16 AM

That Brazil experienced a surprising political movement and elected a right-wing government after decades of a democratic socialist regime, many people already know. However, a political movement is not enough to change the future of a nation. The reality is that Brazil is missing the most important element needed to root out an ideology of tyranny: an intellectual movement. The lack of a right-wing intellectual movement can cause dangerous consequences in Brazil.

In the book The Intellectuals and Socialism, Friedrich Hayek explains the power of intellectuals in shaping public opinion. He argues that an intellectual movement is not interested in approaching issues practically in the current moment, but rather approaching issues theoretically, appealing to philosophy and imagination. As a result, while a political movement can influence public discourse momentarily, the intellectual movement has a lasting effect and successfully persuades public opinion. The same argument is made by Auguste Comte, the French philosopher known as the founder of the discipline of sociology. In explaining how the creation of theories has a lasting impact on culture, Comte once remarked that “the dead govern the living.” Intellectuals may die but their ideas continue changing minds.

To illustrate the power of ideas in driving social and political movements, Hayek uses socialism as an example:

Socialism has never and nowhere been at first a working-class movement. It is a construction of theorists, deriving from certain tendencies of abstract thought with which for a long time only the intellectuals were familiar; and it required long efforts by the intellectuals before the working classes could be persuaded to adopt it as their program.

The same can be said of the French Revolution, which was first sparked by a small group of intellectuals that eventually gave rise to a practical movement and many other movements that followed. By no means was the shift from a socialist to a capitalist government in Brazil revolutionary, since politicians were elected democratically. Ideological changes in Brazil gained traction in the political arena but there is no intellectual movement to sustain the changes. While the current government in Brazil is capitalist, the left still controls the intellectual vehicles within society.

The leftist intellectual movement in Brazil is not contemporary and, as in many other Latin American countries, started over a century ago. In this long and planned process, the left successfully dominated crucial public opinion channels in the country, such as the media, NGOs, public bodies and universities. The most visible example of this phenomenon is the Sao Paulo Forum, an annual conference held by socialist intellectuals, political parties and organizations with the mission of discussing left-wing and progressive ideals, promoting the domination of socialism in Latin America and the Caribbean. The conference was created in 1990 and held the first meeting in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Since its creation, the Sao Paulo Forum — accused by some of being involved with the FARCs (narco-terrorist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) — silently influenced the media and effected governments throughout Latin America and Caribbean. Today, the Sao Paulo Forum is not as influential as it used to be at the beginning of the century, however the conference is still alive, bringing together left-wing ideologues to regain power in the continent.

As Hayek discusses in The Intellectuals and Socialism, socialists drive much of the intellectual debates and therefore dominate public opinion. Hayek urgently calls for a classical liberal intellectual movement to gain public opinion and succeed in the long term:

We need intellectual leaders who are willing to work for an ideal, however small may be the prospects of its early realization. They must be men who are willing to stick to principles and to fight for their full realization, however remote. The promises they must leave to the politicians.

The Intellectuals and Socialism was published in 1965, however it still serves to explain the current moment in Brazil. Polls have showed that recently elected President Jair Bolsonaro has lost significant support since his election, and only 33% of the population considers his government to be “good”, indicating one of the worst approval rates in recent history. Certainly, this is the consequence of a nonexistent conservative intellectual movement.

Indeed, Brazil needs more people devoted to conservative ideals as the philosopher Olavo de Carvalho, one of the few individuals mitted to defending conservatism, has pointed out. Carvalho has prominently opposed the Sao Paulo Forum since its inauguration and his ideas have had a great influence on President Bolsonaro, who gave his first speech as president while holding one of Carvalho’s books. However, Carvalho is outnumbered in the intellectual arena by socialists and the media is very hostile towards him, often labeling him as “insane” — as Terrence McCoy does in his erroneous article in the Washington Post. As a result, Carvalho has acquired a negative reputation among many Brazilians and has been unable to create a solid movement.

Perhaps, more conservative intellectuals will emerge when conservative think tanks are founded in Brazil, institutions fundamental in debating theories in the intellectual arena. While the United States currently boasts 1871 think tanks, Brazil has only 103, behind countries with a significantly smaller population such as Japan, Italy and Argentina. It is not for nothing that Carvalho states in many of his books that there is a “hate” for intellectualism in Brazil

There is no question that the election of a right-wing government is important. The conservative politicians elected play a crucial role in the process of an ideological transition desired by many Brazilians, since they are the ones who implement the changes. However, as Hayek shows, politics is not enough. Without a strong and persistent intellectual movement I am afraid the current political movement in Brazil will not last for long.

Featured Image: Home page photo published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic:

Olavo de Carvalho, Jair Bolsonaro and other Brazilian authorities in Washington D.C, 2019.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The persistent advantage of private virtue
Several years ago, in a discussion on Charles Murray’s bookComing Apart, Ross Douthat included a brilliant observation about what he dubs the “persistent advantage of private virtue“: Finally, Murray makes a very convincing case . . . for the power of so-called “traditional values” to foster human flourishing even in economic landscapes that aren’t as favorable to less-educated workers as was, say, the aftermath of the Treaty of Detroit. Even acknowledging all the challenges (globalization, the decline of manufacturing, mass...
Against canned food drives: When gift-giving is wasteful
During a season such as Christmas, when hyper-consumerism and hyper-generosity often converge in strange and mysterious ways, how much of our gift-giving is inefficient or wasteful? It’s a question that economists continue to ponder, but to which many a gift-giver is prone to shrug. In one sense, isn’t the whole pointto mirror the most extravagant gift of all? Why be concerned about “wasteful” giving? But if the starting points of our generosity e decidedly apathetic or misaligned with actual human...
Why we need the profit system
There is a paradox when es to profits, says economist Arnold Kling: while the profits that accrue to any given individual may be unjust, the profit system itself is necessary in order to have a modern, progressive society. There is no simple way for us to enjoy the benefits of the system while ing all of the instances of injustice. Yet despite the injustice, says Kling, the profit system is the most effective, humane way to organize economic activity. The...
Why increasing job safety lowers workers wages
Note: This is post #58 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Here’s a surprising fact: Firms have an incentive to increase job safety, because then they can lower wages. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok explores this claim in much greater depth and answers the questions: Why do riskier jobs often pay more? Why has job safety increased over the years? How does a firm’s profit motive play a role? (If you find the...
Appreciating the importance of vocational education
If there is one thing young people believe in collectively, it is their individuality. “No two people are alike,” the refrain goes. But in the age of Common Core, educational systems too often treat all students alike, glossing over their unique skills and abilities. A top-down, cookie-cutter curriculum and the decline of vocational education have left too many children, on both sides of the Atlantic, without an ability to exercise their gifts. Erik Lidström, who has written extensively on educational...
Christian freedom isn’t about choice
As supporters of economic freedom, we frequently find ourselves in vigorous defense of personal choice, whether in business, trade, consumer goods, education, or otherwise. But while the elevation of economic choice is based on plenty of principle, not to mention historical and empirical analysis, we ought to be careful that our views about freedom aren’t confused or conflated in the process. Given our cultural appetite for turning choice into an idol above all else, it’s a risk we’d do well...
When it comes to work-life balance, women know better than government
A series of governments across the West have crafted policies designed to help women achieve their goals. However, they failed to ask women what those goals might be. Economic interventions designed to nudge women into careers they don’t want, or to enter the workforce full-time even if they prefer to work in the home, uniquely disempower the women they are intended to help. Juan A. Soto, executive director of the Barcelona-based think tankFundación Arete, tackles the issue in a new...
What would life be like without free enterprise?
The Fund for American Studies has a superb It’s a Wonderful Life-style video about life without capitalism. The video not only shows what life would be like if we banned free enterprise (i.e., a lot like Soviet Russia) but also makes the point that when you lose economic freedom you lose other freedoms too. As the angel says, “When you take away the carrot, all you’re left with is the stick. My favorite part of the video: Anti-capitalist activist: “I...
No size or space in subsidiarity
When thinking and talking about principle of subsidiarity I’ve tended to resort to using metaphors of size and space (i.e.,nothing should be done by a higher orlargerorganization which can be done as well by a smalleror lower organization). But philosopher Brandon Watson explains why that is not really what subsidiarity is all about: The subsidiarity principle is often paired with the principle of solidarity, and there is a real connection between the two. Solidarity is the active sense of responsibility...
6 Quotes: C.S. Lewis on government, economics, and freedom
The beloved novelist and Christian thinker C. S. Lewis was born on Nov. 29, 1898, in Belfast, Ireland. In honor of his 119th birthday, here are six quotes from Lewis on government, economics, and freedom: On democratic government: “I am a democrat because I believe in the Fall of Man. I think most people are democrats for the opposite reason. A great deal of democratic enthusiasm descends from the ideas of people like Rousseau, who believed in democracy because they...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved