Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Brazil needs a right-wing intellectual movement
Brazil needs a right-wing intellectual movement
May 14, 2026 10:10 AM

That Brazil experienced a surprising political movement and elected a right-wing government after decades of a democratic socialist regime, many people already know. However, a political movement is not enough to change the future of a nation. The reality is that Brazil is missing the most important element needed to root out an ideology of tyranny: an intellectual movement. The lack of a right-wing intellectual movement can cause dangerous consequences in Brazil.

In the book The Intellectuals and Socialism, Friedrich Hayek explains the power of intellectuals in shaping public opinion. He argues that an intellectual movement is not interested in approaching issues practically in the current moment, but rather approaching issues theoretically, appealing to philosophy and imagination. As a result, while a political movement can influence public discourse momentarily, the intellectual movement has a lasting effect and successfully persuades public opinion. The same argument is made by Auguste Comte, the French philosopher known as the founder of the discipline of sociology. In explaining how the creation of theories has a lasting impact on culture, Comte once remarked that “the dead govern the living.” Intellectuals may die but their ideas continue changing minds.

To illustrate the power of ideas in driving social and political movements, Hayek uses socialism as an example:

Socialism has never and nowhere been at first a working-class movement. It is a construction of theorists, deriving from certain tendencies of abstract thought with which for a long time only the intellectuals were familiar; and it required long efforts by the intellectuals before the working classes could be persuaded to adopt it as their program.

The same can be said of the French Revolution, which was first sparked by a small group of intellectuals that eventually gave rise to a practical movement and many other movements that followed. By no means was the shift from a socialist to a capitalist government in Brazil revolutionary, since politicians were elected democratically. Ideological changes in Brazil gained traction in the political arena but there is no intellectual movement to sustain the changes. While the current government in Brazil is capitalist, the left still controls the intellectual vehicles within society.

The leftist intellectual movement in Brazil is not contemporary and, as in many other Latin American countries, started over a century ago. In this long and planned process, the left successfully dominated crucial public opinion channels in the country, such as the media, NGOs, public bodies and universities. The most visible example of this phenomenon is the Sao Paulo Forum, an annual conference held by socialist intellectuals, political parties and organizations with the mission of discussing left-wing and progressive ideals, promoting the domination of socialism in Latin America and the Caribbean. The conference was created in 1990 and held the first meeting in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Since its creation, the Sao Paulo Forum — accused by some of being involved with the FARCs (narco-terrorist Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) — silently influenced the media and effected governments throughout Latin America and Caribbean. Today, the Sao Paulo Forum is not as influential as it used to be at the beginning of the century, however the conference is still alive, bringing together left-wing ideologues to regain power in the continent.

As Hayek discusses in The Intellectuals and Socialism, socialists drive much of the intellectual debates and therefore dominate public opinion. Hayek urgently calls for a classical liberal intellectual movement to gain public opinion and succeed in the long term:

We need intellectual leaders who are willing to work for an ideal, however small may be the prospects of its early realization. They must be men who are willing to stick to principles and to fight for their full realization, however remote. The promises they must leave to the politicians.

The Intellectuals and Socialism was published in 1965, however it still serves to explain the current moment in Brazil. Polls have showed that recently elected President Jair Bolsonaro has lost significant support since his election, and only 33% of the population considers his government to be “good”, indicating one of the worst approval rates in recent history. Certainly, this is the consequence of a nonexistent conservative intellectual movement.

Indeed, Brazil needs more people devoted to conservative ideals as the philosopher Olavo de Carvalho, one of the few individuals mitted to defending conservatism, has pointed out. Carvalho has prominently opposed the Sao Paulo Forum since its inauguration and his ideas have had a great influence on President Bolsonaro, who gave his first speech as president while holding one of Carvalho’s books. However, Carvalho is outnumbered in the intellectual arena by socialists and the media is very hostile towards him, often labeling him as “insane” — as Terrence McCoy does in his erroneous article in the Washington Post. As a result, Carvalho has acquired a negative reputation among many Brazilians and has been unable to create a solid movement.

Perhaps, more conservative intellectuals will emerge when conservative think tanks are founded in Brazil, institutions fundamental in debating theories in the intellectual arena. While the United States currently boasts 1871 think tanks, Brazil has only 103, behind countries with a significantly smaller population such as Japan, Italy and Argentina. It is not for nothing that Carvalho states in many of his books that there is a “hate” for intellectualism in Brazil

There is no question that the election of a right-wing government is important. The conservative politicians elected play a crucial role in the process of an ideological transition desired by many Brazilians, since they are the ones who implement the changes. However, as Hayek shows, politics is not enough. Without a strong and persistent intellectual movement I am afraid the current political movement in Brazil will not last for long.

Featured Image: Home page photo published under Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic:

Olavo de Carvalho, Jair Bolsonaro and other Brazilian authorities in Washington D.C, 2019.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Religion, recidivism, and reform
The Detroit News ran mentary from the end of last year on the role of religion and prisoner reform today, “Don’t prevent religion from helping to reform prisoners.” The version that ran today omits the references to Jeremy Bentham, which you can get from the original and this related blog post. In related news, Prison Fellowship president Mark Earley reports today that the “Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has set February 13, 2007, for oral arguments in the appeal of...
Negotiating entitlements
Last night the President spoke of “the challenge of entitlements” and said that “Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid mitments of conscience — and so it is our duty to keep them permanently sound.” “With enough good sense and good will, you and I can fix Medicare and Medicaid — and save Social Security,” he averred. The ability of the federal government to negotiate drug prices has been an aspect of the recent debate over Medicare that was brought to...
The long, slow march of freedom
With respect to the extension of political, economic, and religious freedom, East Asia contains some of the more challenging spots on the globe. mented in the past on Korea and China. It seems safe now to place in the column “making progress” a nation that had been one of the most totalitarian, Vietnam. Concerning the sphere of religious freedom, Zenit offers this interview (Daily Dispatch 01-25) with French Archbishop Bernard-Nicolas Aubertin of Tours. Aubertin characterizes the situation of the Catholic...
Rangel at the helm
mittee, arguably, has more power or attracts more lobbyists than the Committee on Ways and Means,” writes the NYT’s Robin Toner. “Representative Charles B. Rangel, Democrat of New York, joined mittee in 1975, and now, at the age of 76, has finally arrived at the very top.” “[Jesus] said the rich are going straight to hell.” Jared Bernstein, a liberal economist, said: “When the Ways and Means Committee has worked well, they’ve identified social needs and advocated for the funds...
The global warming trough
Kim Strasell in OpinionJournal today: CEOs are quick learners, and even those who would get smacked by a carbon cap are now devising ways to make warming work to their political advantage. The “most creative” prize goes to steel giant Nucor. Steven Rowlan, pany’s environmental director, doesn’t want carbon caps in the U.S.–oh, no. The smarter answer, he explains, would be for the U.S. to impose trade restrictions on foreign firms that aren’t environmentally clean. Global warming as foil for...
Child labor is too expensive
Child labor is too expensive, at least for the Grand Rapids Press. As part of “cost-cutting measures,” The Press will no longer be delivered by paperboys and papergirls under the age of 18. According to , “In a change to the way they deliver their papers to their carriers, The Press announced they will drop off their papers to depots around the city instead of at neighborhood corners. The carrier will have to go to that depot to get their...
Even Big Bird knows better
You may have seen this story a few weeks back toward the end of last year: “Some faith groups say bottled water immoral,” by Rebecca U. Cho of the Religion News Service. The core of the story revolves around this assertion made by the National Council of Churches Eco-Justice Program and a number of other mainline projects: Drinking bottled water is a sin. Cassandra Carmichael, director of eco-justice programs for the National Council of Churches, bases this claim on the...
Porn drives tech? Maybe not…
They say that technology drives culture (HT: Zondervan>To The Point). But what drives technology? Many believe that pornography is the driving force behind adoption of particular technologies. Thus, says Slate television critic Troy Patterson, “Watching YouTube is far closer to consuming Internet pornography than staring at the television. … But then, all media culture has an increasingly pornographic feel, doesn’t it?” Let’s look at some actual cases where this claim has been made (HT: Slashdot). In a recent TG Daily...
Faith-based weather broadcasting
Via Drudge, the Weather Channel “Climate Expert” is taking serious flack (check ments) for her call to pull the credentials of any media meteorologist who doesn’t endorse the theory of human-caused global warming. The cover provided by her boss doesn’t garner any more favorable feedback. I think people want more science from scientists and less dogma. I know I do. UPDATE: On the other hand, this seems a little over the top. If forecasters can’t reliably tell us what will...
Jewish theology and economic theory
Pick up the new monograph, Judaism, Markets, and Capitalism: Separating Myth from Reality, from the all-new Acton Bookshoppe today! How does one account for the widespread distaste among Jews for a free market political agenda? Why is it that Jews, who earn per capita almost twice as much as non-Jews in America, “fervently support relatively collectivist social policies”? Corinne and Robert Sauer, co-founders of the Jerusalem Institute for Market Studies, contend that “it is not at all true that Judaism...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved