Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Book Review: ‘Sex and the Unreal City’ by Anthony Esolen
Book Review: ‘Sex and the Unreal City’ by Anthony Esolen
Jun 29, 2025 12:03 AM

Sex and the Unreal City. Anthony Esolen

Ignatius Press. 2020. 209 pages.

What is the primary problem in society? An embrace of unreality, answers Anthony Esolen in his latest book, Sex and the Unreal City. In Esolen’s view, our culture has moved beyond promoting immorality to fully adopting unrealities as foundational “truths.” Esolen uses cutting wit to highlight how society is built upon false premises and promotes departure from reality. He says that someone ignoring the nature of reality is like “saying they could alter the nature of melanoma by calling it a beauty mark.” This unreality is not just disturbing because it is incorrect, but because it is soul-sapping and physically destructive. Esolen’s work should be viewed not as a specific policy proposal, but as satire meant to sting us awake and point us to what is real. As a part of the long and storied gadfly tradition, Sex and the Unreal City lampoons society and its contradictions while offering a solution that affirms both our souls and bodies. Along the way, the reader is treated to key insights into the nature of evil and the nature of reality.

The book is a collection of five essays organized around what Esolen terms the Unreal City. He highlights the different parts of the city, which are fundamentally untenable. The essays explore unreality in the spheres of education, the body, materialism, and religion. The fifth essay presents a solution to the collective delusion of the Unreal City. Since the purpose of satire is to offend our sensibilities in order to wake us up from some lie which we accept unthinkingly, the book is a strange fit for our offense-sensitive times. Yet, if Esolen’s core argument is true, satire is precisely what society needs in order to wake up from a state of unreality.

In his discussion of the nature of evil, Esolen falls within the groups of theologians who have affirmed that evil exists only as a denial of the truth. The fourth-century theologian Athanasius described the nature of evil with an analogy of a charioteer racing towards the finish line. The horseman ought to go towards the finish line, but he instead mistakes speed for the goal and runs pell-mell off the course: “So the soul too, fueled by disordered appetites turning from the way towards God, and driving the members of the body beyond what is proper … has swerved from the goal of truth.” Evil is anything that is a negation of the truth, the horseman traveling in any direction except the finish line.

Esolen contextualizes this insight and clarifies how our social ethic rejects the truth and swerves into ruin just like the charioteer. When we disregard categories of good and evil, we are forced into a state of unreality:

When one believes that good and evil are not objective realities to be discovered by the practical reason and to be honored in custom and law, and when, moreover, one dispenses with God’s revelation, which does not override reason but clarifies matters for us, giving our reason a boost, then nothing remains but to believe that “good” and “evil” are subjective and relative to the evaluator and his society.

What is the panacea to the Unreal City? In his final essay, Esolen reflects on the incarnation, which is the final counterpoint to any denial of reality. Jesus entered the world, became human, lived a perfect life, and conquered death. In the resurrection of the flesh, Jesus affirmed and redeemed our physical reality. Furthermore, he offers spiritual promise that allows us to enter into what is true, good, and noble. The Unreal City is an institution attempting to escape the implications of the incarnation, but it will ultimately fail. Esolen affirms the Apostle’s Creed as an anchor to the truth. A tenet is “literally what you grab hold of as a rock climber.” These tenets act as a guide, fulfilling the allied spheres of faith and reason.

Because this book is a collection of essays, the arc of Esolen’s argument is sometimes lost. He easily yields to tangents of loosely related literary references and the various elements of society which he critiques. He cannot help lampooning things that he doesn’t like, and there are many things which he does not like. This is the most credulous age, he argues, an age where people unthinkingly accept all sorts of newfangled moral inventions. He attacks many of these inventions without necessarily having the space plete his arguments. Yet, at the same time, one of the core strengths in the book is Esolen’s ability to connect and synthesize seemingly disparate topics.

Although he satirizes culture, Esolen doesn’t leave us with merely a critique. He advocates a return to the truth within a culture which is fundamentally alienated, soul and body, from the truths of human nature, the created order, and God. Although Esolen bitingly rejects our current culture, his analysis is ultimately hopeful. For, through the incarnation, the Unreal City has already been conquered once. The world “gleams with the possibility of glory,” and Jesus calls us to turn to him and e real.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Christian Market?
Joe Carter discusses “What the Market Economy Needs to Be Moral” today over at First Things: On the Square. He rightly points to the twin errors of collectivism and atomistic individualism, each of which have been soundly criticized in Catholic Social Teaching, for instance. I do wonder, though, given that Joe acknowledges the role of free individuals (not to be abstracted from their social relationships and responsibilities, of course) whether we need a “third way” as he proposes, or simply...
Mere Comments: The Neo-Anabaptist Temptation
Today at Mere Comments I highlight what I’m calling the “Neo-Anabaptist temptation.” Check it out. ...
Of Miracles and Means
Last week I linked to Joe Carter’s On the Square piece, “What the Market Economy Needs to be Moral,” challenging his view that we need a “third way.” He has since clarified his position, and noted that what he wants is not really an alternative to the market economy but an alternative grounding, view of, and justification for the market economy. This is a position with which I wholeheartedly concur. Today I want to highlight something else from Carter’s helpful...
Almshouses in Europe from the Late Middle Ages to the Present
An interesting call for papers from H-Net, “Almshouses in Europe from the late Middle Ages to the Present – Comparisons and Peculiarities”: Within the field of poor relief and welfare, research interests have recently shifted towards the history of private charity and charitable foundations. Among these institutions, which contributed to the early modern and modern mixed economy of welfare, the almshouse played an important role as a particular form of social housing. Almshouses originated in the Middle Ages and many...
German Freedom and the Danger of Socialism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I remember German reunification and reflect on its relevance for the present. Twenty years ago this Sunday, East and West Germany reunited, capping one of the most extraordinary transformations in modern history. Communism in the Soviet Union and its eastern European satellites had collapsed; the oppressed nations of Europe rejoined the “free world.” My generation was the last to straddle the two worlds, pre- and post-Soviet Union. When I was in elementary and high school,...
The Main Battle
In the “Wealth Inequality Mirage” on RealClearMarkets, Diana Furchtgott-Roth looks at the campaign waged by “levelers” who exaggerate and distort statistics about e inequality to advance their political ends. The gap, she says, is the “main battle” in the Nov. 2 election. “Republicans want to keep current tax rates to encourage businesses to expand and hire workers,” she writes. “Democrats want to raise taxes for the top two brackets, and point to rising e inequality as justification.” This is a...
Review: Whittaker Chambers
Whittaker Chambers began Witness, the classic account of his time in the American Communist underground, with the declaration: “In 1937, I began, like Lazarus, the impossible return.” The line was most of all a deep recognition of the power of God to redeem what was once dead. Witness was a landmark account of the evils of Communism but most importantly a description of the bankruptcy of freedom outside of the sacred. “For Chambers, God was always the prime mover in...
Samuel Gregg: Europe’s Broken Economies
Acton’s Research Director in the American Spectator: Europe’s Broken Economies By Samuel Gregg During September this year, much of Europe descended into mild chaos. Millions of Spaniards and French went on strike (following, of course, their return from six weeks vacation) against austerity measures introduced by their governments. Across the continent, there are deepening concerns about possible sovereign-debt defaults, stubbornly-high unemployment, Ireland’s renewed banking woes, and the resurgence of right-wing populist parties (often peddling left-wing economic ideas). Indeed, the palpable...
A Federal Tax Receipt
There’s an old saying to the effect: “Show me a man’s checkbook and I’ll show you what’s important to him.” It may not be quite the same as a checkbook, but NPR’s Planet Money passes along what a receipt from the federal government might look like for an average taxpayer (HT): As Third Way, who put together the taxpayer receipt, argues: An electorate unschooled in basic budget facts is a major obstacle to controlling the nation’s deficit, not to mention...
Global Warming Consensus Alert: KILL ‘EM ALL
I’ll admit – it’s been a long time since I’ve posted a Global Warming Consensus Alert because, frankly, any “consensus” that existed was blown apart by the release of the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit e-mails, which revealed a whole bunch of underhanded activity on the part of scientists promoting the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis. What’s the point anymore? The unshakeable climate “consensus” has been shown to be the fraud that it always was, and the catastrophic climate...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved