Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Book Review: ‘A Mother’s Ordeal – One Woman’s Fight Against China’s One-Child Policy’
Book Review: ‘A Mother’s Ordeal – One Woman’s Fight Against China’s One-Child Policy’
Jun 25, 2025 2:30 PM

Steven W. Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, has written a book that is brutally truthful and brutally hard to read. It should be: it’s about the most brutal of government policies, China’s one-child policy.

Written in the first person, Mosher writes as “Chi An,” a young woman he first met in 1980. While he has changed certain facts and names in order to protect the woman he gives voice to, the story of her life in China is intimately true.

Chi An’s life begins in 1949 or so – because she was a girl, there was no celebration of her birth, and her mother did not bother to note the exact date. She grew up with two brothers, enjoying a loving childhood with a father who doted on her. Her professor-father shielded his family from the most difficult issues of the time: the gradual disintegration of liberty under the rising Communist regime. With her father’s untimely death, the family struggles to survive, nearly starving to death in the early 1960s, due to harsh government control of food distribution.

Chi An decided to go into nursing, and at the age of 16, performed her first abortion. It would be the first of countless abortions she would perform.

Chi An married and she and her husband happily ed a son early in their marriage. At this time, the Maoist regime still allowed more than one child, but this allowance quickly ended. Unfortunately for Chi An and her husband, her second pregnancy had to be aborted or, as the government put it, “remedial actions were taken.” That phrase was one Chi An would repeat over and over to other women facing “unauthorized” pregnancies.

While Chi An mourned the loss of her pregnancy, her husband was granted permission to study in the United States. Chi An and their son stayed behind, and Chi An became the nurse for a Chinese pany. While her job was ostensibly to maintain the health of the female workers, it really consisted of talking women into abortions and then performing those abortions. pany had a birth quota; anything above that required “remedial measures.” If that meant locking a woman in a closet until plied, so be it. If that meant dragging a woman from her home for pliance,” so be it. Abortions were performed at every stage of pregnancy, and babies were often killed after birth as well. There were quotas, remedial measures and death…but passion.

Chi An eventually earned the privilege of joining her husband in the United States on a visa. Shortly after arriving here, she became pregnant. The reach of the Chinese government knew no boundaries: she was ordered by pany to abort the baby. Her family in China was threatened; she and her husband were threatened. The pressure to abort was relentless, but Chi An refused, desperately seeking a way to keep her baby.

When she and her husband sought asylum, it was refused. The couple met Steve Mosher through a friend, and their attorney worked with him to fight for the couple to remain in the States and continue the pregnancy. Asylum was eventually granted, and Chi An and her husband continue to live in the U.S., along with their son and daughter.

This book is hard to read; it’s callous and brutal and disgusting. The horror of Chi An’s es to life in the chapter entitled “The Little-Boy-Who-Wouldn’t-Die.” A young girl, at full term, was forced to abort her baby. One doctor, then another, plunged formaldehyde into the baby’s brain in the birth canal, but still the baby was born, struggling for breath. The doctors left the baby, mother and Chi An alone in the clinic room. Chi An recounts:

I frantically set to work caring for the exhausted mother, lifting her legs down from the stirrups, sponging her off with cool water, arranging pads to catch the steady flow of blood, finding a pillow for her head. But there was nothing I could do for the baby. I could only keep my eyes averted from its contorted little face. And, as best as I could, I shut out the sounds of its cries and whimpers, which only now began to weaken.

The little boy took half an hour to die.

As difficult as this book is to read, it is important to do so. While the Chinese government has lifted some restrictions, forced abortions monplace. Chi An’s story, while gripping, is only one in millions of stories – stories of children never born, born but not allowed to live. Chi An’s life stands as witness to a place where liberty does not exist, and a journey to a place where liberty is discovered.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Rev. Sirico on defending the free market
Why should we care about human dignity, creativity and flourishing? Why value human creativity? Why even believe that human beings possess dignity and rights? As Rev. Robert Sirico writes in the Washington Times, the free market system assumes, rather than defends, the value of all these things—something easy to miss because most of us share these sentiments. The religious foundation with which I was imbued as a child, and to which I returned after a spell in the wilderness of...
Bob Dylan wins Nobel Prize in Literature
When Bob Dylan wrote, “The Times They Are A Changin’,” I doubt he had the Swedish Academy in mind. Nevertheless, by awarding him the 2016 Nobel Prize in Literature the Academy has made a bold statement for a change in the way songwriting is viewed as literature. Many people have plained that there were many more worthy potential recipients. But let’s face the facts: Bob Dylan won, and they lost. He likely didn’t even know he peting. (Reportedly, he was...
Entitlement and the Christian vision of work
Whether directly connected with our passions or not, God calls us first and foremost to do the next thing well, to his glory, with all of our might, says John Stonestreet. Short of this awareness, we risk “Christianizing” a sense of entitlement. Christians are guilty of inculcating false expectations to their young as well. For at least a couple of generations, Christian colleges and other educational institutions, with the noble intention municating the biblical concept of “calling” being more than...
Does the government do too much or too little?
“There are many things government can’t do—many good purposes it must renounce,” said Lord Acton. “It must leave them to the enterprise of others. It cannot feed the people. It cannot enrich the people. It cannot teach the people. It cannot convert the people.” Unfortunately for us, too few of our fellow Americans would agree with Lord Acton on that point. Many people think the government can feed, enrich, and teach us—and even convert us to the “right” (i.e., politically...
Principles for a Christian understanding of economics
Many Christians assume that the Bible has nothing at all to say about economics, says Albert Mohler. But a biblical worldview actually has a great deal to teach us about economic matters. Mohler notesthat while the Christian worldview does not demand or promote a particular economic system, there are several principles that should guide our thinking: 6. A Christian economic understanding rewards initiative, industry and investment. Initiative, industry and investment are three crucial words for the Christian’s economic and theological...
Sed contra: Taxation is theft
Over at the Libertarian Christian Institute, Jamin Hübner engages my reflection on taxation and Sam Gregg’s book, For God and Profit, with his sed contra: “But what if the ‘taxation is theft’ creed is consistent with both Christian and libertarian ideas, and that all things considered, taxation really is theft? And what if we’re simply misreading or misappropriating the New Testament? This wouldn’t be fortable or popular conclusion to draw, but it might be the case nevertheless.” Hübner accuses me...
Video: Rev. Sirico On The Podesta Emails
Rev. Robert A. Sirico, President of the Acton Institute, joined host Neil Cavuto on Fox News Channel’s The Cost of Freedomthis morning to discuss the ments about conservative Catholics and Evangelicals by Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta and other campaign staffers in a recently released batch of hacked emails from Wikileaks. You can watch the interview below. ...
7 Figures: How young Americans view socialism, communism, and capitalism
The Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation recently released its annual report on U.S. attitudes towards socialism. Here are seven figures you should know from the survey: 1. The percentage of millenials who are unfamiliar with: Mao Zedong (42 percent), Che Guevara (40 percent), Vladimir Lenin (33 percent), Karl Marx (32 percent), Vladimir Putin (18 percent), Joseph Stalin (18 percent). 2. Among those familiar, at least a quarter have favorable impressions of Guevara (37 percent), Marx (34 percent), and Lenin (25...
Video: Paul Bonicelli on Evangelicals and the 2016 Election
Acton Institute Director of Programs and Education Paul Bonicelli joined host Juliet Dragoson WZZM 13 News in Grand Rapids, Michigan yesterday to discuss the choice facing evangelical voters in the ing 2016 presidential election. You can watch the interview below. ...
Trump is the lewd American male
The implosion of Donald Trump’s campaign is a reminder that at the end of the day, character matters more than professional success or mitments. At the beginning of the second presidential debate Donald apologized again for the ments recorded during a private discussion with Billy Bush in 2005 in which he boasted of romantically pursuing married women and groping others. In his apology, he referred to that discussion as regular “locker room talk.” In other words, Trump believes he is...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved