Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Arvo Pärt on the economy of wonder
Arvo Pärt on the economy of wonder
Jul 1, 2025 11:37 AM

Our society has grown increasingly transactional in its ways of thinking, whether about family, business, education, or politics. Everything we spend, steward, or invest — our money, time, and relationships — must somehow secure an immediate personal return or reward, lest it be cast aside as “wasteful.”

As an overarching philosophy of life, such an approach fails not due only due to its narrow individualism, but also to its cramped obsession with scarcity, standing in stark contrast with the lavish abundance and gratuitous generosity of the Gospel. Economic man is, indeed, a myth, and yet so many of our social signals and inputs continue to pretend otherwise, distorting the goods of productivity and efficiency into idols unto ourselves.

In For the Life of the World, Makoto Fujimuru shares this same concern, noting the importance of using our freedom not only to protect and provide for ourselves and our families, but for creation, cultivation, and generosity according to a higher perspective. “God somehow demands of us so much more than this transactional nature,” he says. “It is really about the gift that we’ve been given, and the only response we can give back is with extravagance, with gratuitous beauty.”

I was reminded this when I listened to a recent talk by Arvo Pärt, the famous poser. Much like Fujimura, Pärt points to art as a key example of how something so seemingly wasteful – or so utterly non-transactional — can still produce tremendous beauty and value.

The work of poser is not ultimately about the music itself, Pärtexplains, but about the worship, the soul formation, and the spiritual reconciliation that the creative process invites, both for ourselves and for others. “The most sensitive musical instrument is the human soul,” he says. “The next is the human voice. One must purify the soul until it begins to sound.”

As poser, leveraging his gifts oftenfeels like a waste — slow and tedious, useless and unappreciated, faltering and frustrating — but in the end, it is indeed fruitful, serving God and neighbor in turn. How often do we feel the same in our daily jobs or parenting or policymaking?

poser is a musical instrument, and at the same time, a performer on that instrument. The instrument has to be in order to produce song. One must start with that, not with the music. Through the music, poser can check whether his instrument is tuned and to what key it is tuned.

God knits man in his mother’s womb, slowly and wisely. Art should be born in a similar way. To be like a beggar when es to writing music. Whatever, however, and whenever God gives. We shouldn’t grieve because of writing little and poorly, but because we pray little and poorly and lukewarmly and live in the wrong way. The criterion must be everywhere and only, humility. Music is my friend, passionate, forgiving. It’s forter. The handkerchief for drying my tears of sadness. The source of my tears of joy. My liberation and flight. But also a painful thorn in my flesh and soul. That which makes me sober and teaches humility.

Such a lesson doesn’t just apply to poser or painter or novelist. We are all artists, co-creators who are working to get our “instruments” in order and wield humility as we prayerfully collaborate across varying cultural spheres. As we work and serve, create and innovate, surely God wants us to locate certain efficiencies and mutual value. But he also longs for us to relish in the mystery of his divine plan, and that requires an economic imagination that reaches beyond mere, temporal utility.

Only when we have the humility, patience, and imagination for such beauty will we be able to stay faithful and true to the work it requires – messy, frustrating, and seemingly wasteful though it may be. As we offer up our various gifts across the economic order, we can move forward and make our contributions not out of mere transactional cravings or fears about earthbound scarcity, but in a spirit of wonder, abundance, and divine generosity.

“We need to tell this story,” Fujimura says. “Not the story of pragmatism. Not the story of utility. But this story of extravagance, of gratuitous beauty, is the Gospel. That is the story e to die for.”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Immigration Policy and the Future of Free Market
I have been quite concerned for some time about the shrill debate over illegal immigration and its potential fallout for free trade. I have argued, at Acton events and elsewhere, that no long-term solution to the flow of illegal immigration from Mexico is possible, without significant economic growth in Mexico. U.S. per capita GDP is 6.5 times greater than the Mexican per capita GDP. The public service infrastructure in the US is far superior to that in Mexico. Taken together,...
The State Which Would Provide Everything
is the title of an insightful article by Fr. James Schall over at the Ignatius site. An analysis of the political contribution of Deus Caritas Est, Benedict XVI’s first encyclical, ments: The Second half of the encyclical is a brilliant treatise on the nature and limits of the State and what lies beyond it. "We do not need a state which regulates and controls everything," Benedict writes, "but a State which, in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity, generously acknowledges...
Good News for the Moralists
Here’s some good news for those who prefer bat cultural evil through the edification and cultivation of moral sensibilities: In “Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,” Alvin E. Roth finds that “distaste for certain kinds of transactions is a real constraint, every bit as real as the constraints imposed by technology or by the requirements of incentives and efficiency.” He also finds that “while repugnance can change over time, change can be quite slow.” This presumably applies to the decrease...
The Parenting Class
Along the same lines as my earlier post, The Weekly Standard argues that putting the needs of parents first, can form a more stable foundation for an alliance between fiscal and social conservatives. Both fiscal and social conservatives should put themselves in the shoes of the parenting class and focus on petition and choice while also encouraging the growth and strength of the two-parent family. In health care, for instance, conservatives have consistently failed to approach things from that point...
Fast Company’s Social Capitalists
Fast Company has announced the results of its 2007 search for socially panies, conducted along with Monitor Group. View the winners and their grades in slideshow form here. The winners range from the generally praiseworthy, such as ACCION International, to the rather more questionable, like Ceres, whose claim to fame on the list is that “after joining Ceres, Dell agreed to support legislation to require electronics recycling,” to the downright stultifying, such as TransFair USA, the certifying body for the...
Natural Law and Christian Social Thought
Two new and intriguing books from Cambridge University Press have crossed my editorial desk recently. Anticipate reviews to appear in the Journal of Markets & Morality sometime next year; but in the meantime I wanted to give them each a plug. Both draw on the philosophical tradition of the natural law to address contemporary debates in social/political thought. The argument of Christopher Wolfe’s Natural Law Liberalism is summed up in a blurb by Notre Dame law professor Gerard Bradley: “No...
Generous Conservatives
Desperate Philanthropist? In a recent column in the National Post, David Frum looks at an “astonishing” new book on charitable giving due out this month from Syracuse University professor Arthur C. Brooks. In “Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth of Compassionate Conservatism,” Brooks contends that conservatives are really “more generous, more honest and more public-spirited” than liberals. Frum starts his column with a quote from Desperate Housewives actress Eva Longoria, who asserts: “Everyone on Wisteria Lane has the money of...
Wait – You Mean Taxpayers DON’T Have to Pay for Stadiums?
Refreshing news from Major League Baseball: In the interest of full disclosure, I have to say, I have loved the Oakland Athletics for a long time now. I love how they are the anti-Yankees, consistently fielding winning teams despite having one of the lower payrolls in the game, and losing superstar after superstar to richer teams. I love their plucky spirit and their annual belief-defying August winning streaks. I love Billy Beane’s flair for the dramatic. I love that they...
A Thanksgiving Prayer
Almighty God, Father of all mercies, we thine unworthy servants do give thee most humble and hearty thanks for all thy goodness and loving-kindness to us and to all men. We bless thee for our creation, preservation, and all the blessings of this life; but above all for thine inestimable love in the redemption of the world by our Lord Jesus Christ; for the means of grace, and for the hope of glory. And, we beseech thee, give us that...
Bonhoeffer on Church and State, Part 3
The following is the text of a paper presented on November 15, 2006 at the Evangelical Theological Society 58th Annual Meeting in Washington, DC, which was themed, “Christians in the Public Square.” Part 3 of 3 follows below (series index). War and Peace I will conclude with a brief word about Bonhoeffer and pacifism, given the ongoing claims about Bonhoeffer’s mitment to the practice of nonviolence.[i] First, it should be noted, with Clifford J. Green, that it is invalid to...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved