Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Are educational models heading toward creative destruction?
Are educational models heading toward creative destruction?
Jul 1, 2025 1:54 PM

Some 1.2 billion students around the world experienced school closures and an inevitable move to online learning or homeschooling toward the end of the 2019-2020 school year. Graduations and end-of-year celebrations were canceled due to COVID restrictions on public assemblies. This may have been good way to limit the contagion, but did it bring unintended consequences? Was all the creative destruction of traditional education more harmful than it was helpful?

Now with the coronavirus lingering longer than most people thought it would and the beginning of a new academic year upon us, schools across the United States have had a big decision to make: Should they go back to online learning or return to “brick and mortar” schools? Let’s look at some of the pros and cons of virtual educational models.

Shifting pletely online learning allows three different modes of education: asynchronous learning, synchronous learning, or bination of the two. Asynchronous learning does not include real-time interactions between teachers and students, whereas synchronous learning is conducted live with teachers directly instructing students through video-streaming technology like Zoom, Google Hangouts, Teams, or Skype. Both forms of online learning are valuable for students and teachers, but not all students find online learning easy to follow.

For students who benefit from discussion or question-and-answer sessions, synchronous learning is most beneficial. It is also a building block for students to e more accustomed to the novel atmosphere of distance learning. Asynchronous learning, on the other hand, promotes more independent study because learning takes place on the students’ time and largely at their own pace. Finally, it must be said that both synchronous and asynchronous models are more affordable, economically speaking, pared to traditional, in-person education.

With all of these benefits, pivoting to online learning seems to be a great option for students and teachers. Why not make the virtual classroom a permanent part of the future and destroy centuries-old “school house” models? It may be beneficial to slowing the spread of COVID-19, but when looking at the overall effects of online learning, there may be more negatives than positives.

When asked about the shift, college students seemed to find online learning easier than they imagined, but isolation seemed to weigh heavily on many. The lack of lunch-time laughs, classroom camaraderie, and roommate discussions drastically reduced the quality of life for students. Many found themselves alone for long periods of time with their only human interaction occurring online or through phone and chat sessions. While modern technology has made distance relationships possible, we all crave in-person social interaction, especially in market-based societies built on free association. We are hardwired for relationships, according to our human nature. It is an intrinsic part of our position. It is one thing is to reason and learn but another is to reason and learn while forging relationships with a classroom full of people. The in-person interaction, which we often taken for granted, is what makes critical social virtues like passion, tolerance, and cooperation possible. They, in turn, pay critical dividends in sustaining a voluntary, morally anchored, and exchange-based society.

Schools, therefore, are not just diploma factories but are one of the primary sources for human interaction and the virtues it sustains. Thus, schools should not be deemed breeding grounds for disease but a primer for mitigating social maladies such as selfishness, egoism, and the callous treatment of our neighbor with good citizenship and moral discernment.

To e isolation and other ill-effects of reduced human interaction, American universities have attempted to modate as many students as possible with hybrid online and in-classroom instruction. This may increase the chance for real-time human exchanges and free association. However, it may be short-lived in the event of renewed nationwide lockdowns.

Online learning has put an added strain on the parents of children and adolescents who live at home. Instead of being able to drop their children off at school before heading to work, many parents find themselves struggling to juggle work, COVID-19 concerns, and online learning. For example, the Shire family in Pennsylvania had been sending their daughter to a great public school, between COVID-19 restrictions and both parents working full-time jobs, they were forced to pay a private school for daycare, making it more difficult for them to pay their other bills. Parents who elect to educate their children themselves, on the other hand, must purchase classroom supplies in order to provide their children parable quality to “brick and mortar” schooling.

In contrast, a benefit of online learning for some parents is their ability to e more involved with their children’s education. For many families, parents are now able to interact more with teachers and be kept updated on their children’s progress. They can ask questions and supplement the teacher’s instruction. One survey found that 80% of parents are more involved in the education of their children since the beginning of COVID-19. Having more parents involved in their own children’s education reinforces the belief that children’s learning really does begin at home – especially concerning subjects like virtuous character development, which is often purposefully left out of state school systems.

Coronavirus-related school closures have taught us that while we can creatively alter educational models, the human person cannot be modified. As humans we all deeply desire personal, voluntary social interaction, exchange, and conversation. It is a fundamental way of remedying solitude and, above all, honing our social virtues in market-based cultures. If producing responsible and free citizens of society is the number one goal of education, then pure isolation models will be short-lived. We should not expect any permanent paradigm shift in this direction. Meanwhile, hybrid models might lead us to reduce overall costs, grant more freedom to develop critical independent thought, and syphon off bureaucratic bloat from America’s educational system.

domain.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How Frederick Douglass found hope on the Fourth of July
On July 5, 1852, nearly a decade before the start of the Civil War, Frederick Douglass, a freed slave and statesman-abolitionist, offered a profound speech on seeing the Fourth of July through the eyes of a slave. The speech monly known as “What to a slave is the 4th of July?” — illuminates the drastic disconnect between ourfounding principles and the severe oppression of slavery that somehow managed to endure. While the specific evils in question have thankfully been abolished,...
Do we really need another brand of conservatism?
In his new book, F.H. Buckley offers a vision of a “progressive conservatism” that sure sounds like the traditional Grand Old Party platform. Not that that’s a bad thing. Read More… Sisyphus was the first conservative, Claremont Review of Books editor William Voegeli wryly observes, because the lot of the conservative is one of short-lived, temporary victories. Conservatives certainly have no shortage of examples. The 1996 Defense of Marriage Act didn’t even last 20 years, made obsolete by Obergefell v....
We know what women are. They don’t. Now what?
The Daily Wire’s new documentary offers disturbing realities but only one answer to a question that raises many more. What would a sequel look like? Read More… “Nature always tells us the truth, even if we don’t want to hear it.” So begins the latest cinematic offering from the Daily Wire,What Is a Woman? The documentary is stirring up controversy with its sarcastic cultural analysis and skillful showcasing of extreme social absurdity. Conservative mentator Matt Walsh’s dry style edic narration...
Yes, abortion is about race, but not in the way progressives think
Roe v. Wade has been overturned and bad arguments in defense of unrestricted abortion abound. What everyone needs now is a little history lesson. Read More… As I was watching a film with my son the other day, we began to hear chanting below us. We looked out the window and saw protesters marching in the streets shouting, “Hey Hey! Ho Ho! The white man has got to go!” The protesters were themselves white. The protest was in response to...
Tony Sirico, 1942-2022
Requiescat in pace. Read More… Tony Sirico, the renowned actor and older brother of Acton Institute co-founder and president emeritus, Rev. Robert A. Sirico, passed away on July 8, 2022. He was 79 years old. Watch the livestream of the funeral of Tony Sirico on Wednesday, July 13, at 10:30am ET here: Sirico was best known for his role as “Paulie Walnuts” Gualtieriin HBO’sThe Sopranos, for which he won twoScreen Actors Guild Awards for Outstanding Performance by an Ensemble in...
Does The Godfather believe in America?
Mario Puzo and Francis Ford Coppola’s cinematic masterpiece shines a light on how attempts to subvert American institutions in the name of a higher, personal justice can fail calamitously. In the end, human nature will not be subverted. Read More… This month the Tribeca Film Festival celebrated the 50th anniversary of the premiere of The Godfather, an important movie, a movie we at some point got in the habit of calling iconic, and we might remember it made stars of...
The ground is shifting under Francis Fukuyama’s feet
In his new book, the author of The End of History attempts to explain how liberalism is threatened by illiberal elements on the left and right. But flaws in his analysis almost guarantee that this is not the end of the discussion. Read More… In Liberalism and Its Discontents, Francis Fukuyama aims to defend liberal political ideas and institutions against rising and now entrenched detractors from the postliberal left and the right. As he notes, “liberalism is under severe threat...
Twenty-five years after promising autonomy, China has turned Hong Kong into China
Xi Jinping’s recent victory lap in Hong Kong does not bode well for the future of civil rights and freedoms there, as the “one country, two systems” agreement made with Great Britain in 1997 appears irreparably broken. Read More… On January 1, 1997, Hong Kong, effectively seized by Great Britain in war a century before, reverted to Chinese rule. Only recently liberated from the madness of Mao Zedong’s rule, Beijing promised to preserve Hong Kong’s separate “system” for 50 years....
Supernatural thriller Stranger Things shows the all-too-human evil of communism
Season 4 of the Netflix mega-hit still focuses on the reality of supernatural evil, but has added a dose of natural evil as well. But where’s the supernatural good? Read More… The final installment of the fourth season of Netflix’s Stranger Things was released on July 1. According to Variety, season 4’s first installment “of the Duffer Brothers’ hit sci-fi series was viewed for 287 million hours during the week of May 23–29, landing in the No. 1 position.” The...
An economist’s summer reading list
Between raging inflation and declining markets, consumers have much to worry about. What they shouldn’t worry about is whether there are answers at hand. Some new books provide hope. Read More… If you attended Acton University, you saw the treasure trove of books for sale. Several of those books made it onto both my credit card and my summer reading list. Even if you weren’t able to join us at AU, you can still find most of the books here....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved