Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Approaching climate change at Acton University
Approaching climate change at Acton University
Jul 23, 2026 4:38 PM

Jay Richards lecturing at Acton University

How should we respond virtuously to the issue of climate change? During his lecture at Acton University on June 23, Jay Richards wrestled with this question before a nearly packed room. Richards is an author, assistant research professor in the School of Business and Economics at The Catholic University of America, a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute and executive editor of The Stream. During his talk, Richards outlined four questions that he thinks are valuable when approaching the topic of climate change:

1. Is the Earth warming?

2. Are humans causing (or contributing to) it?

3. Is it bad?

4. Would the advised policies, currently the Paris Climate Deal, make any difference?

Richards went to some depth explaining how the CO2 contributions to global temperature are logarithmic in nature; the more CO2 is added the less of an effect it directly has on temperature. Many climate scientist, therefore, are concerned with feedback loops, not the effects of CO2 itself. Feedback loops can be either positive or negative. A positive feedback loop is when the initial circumstance, in this case high levels of CO2 and higher temperatures, results in a process that multiplies the result, like if the higher temperature caused other processes which increased the temperature further. A negative feedback loop is one in which the initial circumstance results in a process which reverses the initial condition. The models scientist use predict more positive feedback loops, meaning that their models predict the increased temperature resulting in further increases in temperature. However, the feedback loops are not well understood, nor have scientists identified all of the loops that exist. All of the models developed and used by scientists indicate that temperatures should be higher than they have been for the recorded last ten years. Recently temperatures have been within what would be considered a normal range. The only exceptions are El Niño years, during which temperatures are higher than average, which Richard argues are considered mon phenomenon that has occurred for thousands of years. Richards suggests that the feedback loop from the increased temperature, due to CO2, is more likely to be neutral, with equal negative and positive feedback loops counteracting one another. Richards states that while the evidence seems to point towards a neutral feedback loop there is insufficient evidence to prove this.

Borrowing from his book The Privileged Planet, which he co-authored with astronomer Guillermo Gonzalez, Richards reached two main conclusions. The first: “Even if it is a catastrophe we still ought to focus on development,” Richard notes. “Particularly in munities.” Poor people will be the most strongly affected by the predicted results of climate change. They lack the material resources to respond and they lack the ability to escape the potentially negative effects of climate change by traveling. The second conclusion is that the real emphasis ought to be on adaptation. The evidence of consistent temperatures for the last ten years seem to suggest that the models proposed by the majority of climate scientists are based on incorrect assumptions. Nonetheless, Richards offers that by being prepared to adapt, the effects of climate change would be minimized. Focusing solely on limiting CO2 emissions for the sake of limiting CO2 emissions is not progress for Richards; he would rather see efforts to mitigate effects of potential warming. Being prepared to adapt includes continuing to progress technologically as well as fighting poverty, thus avoiding a situation where large numbers of the world’s poor are adversely effected by changing climate patterns.

There may still be insufficient evidence to prove, to the skeptic, that climate change is an impending crisis. However, by systematically evaluating the four questions provided by Richards and carefully analyzing which proposed solutions will actually do the most good in fighting the problems associated with climate change, we can hope to provide a bright future to our posterity.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The Michael Novak book that changed reality
From a 2017 vantage point, it’s easy to forget just how radical this book was, says Samuel Gregg in this week’s Acton Commentary. In penning theSpirit of DemocraticCapitalism, Novak was the first theologian to really make an in-depth moral, cultural, and political caseforthe market economy in a systematic way. Needless to say, Novak’s book generated fierce reactions from the religious left. The opprobrium was probably heightened by the fact that theSpiritconfirmed what had e evident from the mid-’70s onwards: that...
Video: Arthur C. Brooks on how to bring America together
American Enterprise Institute President Arthur C. Brooks joined us here at the Acton Institute on Monday evening as part of the Acton Lecture Series, and as usual he delivered a great and optimistic message, even in the midst of this time of deep divisions in the United States. It’s impossible to avoid the fact that America is more deeply divided politically today than it has been in decades, and the question is whether or not the current state of affairs...
DonorSee: A charity app that challenges ‘Big Aid’
For far too long, Westerners have simply accepted the status quo of foreign aid, building ever-larger systems and programs for global charity even as they’re proven to squander resources and disempower the munities they intend to assist. As films like Poverty, Inc.and thePovertyCureaptly demonstrate, when es to charity, we need a profound shift in our heads, hands, and hearts — “from aid to enterprise, from poverty alleviation to wealth creation, from paternalism to partnerships, from handouts to investments.” Such a...
Understanding the President’s Cabinet: Veterans Affairs Secretary
Note: This is the sixth in a weekly series of explanatory posts on the officials and agencies included in the President’s Cabinet. See the series introductionhere. Department of Education / U.S. Department of Education (Public Domain) Cabinet position:Secretary of Veterans Affairs Department:Department of Veterans Affairs Current Secretary:David J. Shulkin Succession:The Secretary of Veterans Affairs is sixteenth in the presidential line of succession. Department Mission:“The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is responsible for providing vital services to America’s veterans. VA provides...
What public schools should learn from homeschool economics
Embed from Getty Images If our new Education Secretary, Betsy DeVos, is looking for a creative way to fix our public schools, she should look to homeschoolers. As Thomas Purifoy explains, homeschooling offers a model for how our schools can be run more effectively. “Public education is the fount of most problems in the United States, not simply based on content, but also on structure,” says Purifoy. “Simply put: it is economically impossible for American public education to be successful...
Why is customer service better at Starbucks than at the DMV?
Note: This is post #22 in a weekly video series on basic microeconomics. Prices are signals that indicate to suppliers how much is being demanded. So what happens when the government puts a cap on the price that can be charged for a product or service? Two effects are shortages and lower quality. In this video by Marginal Revolution University, economist Alex Tabarrok explains why this happens. (If you find the pace of the videos too slow, I’d mend watching...
Why people prefer government to markets
People do not love markets,” says Pascal Boyer of the International Cognition & Culture Institute, “there is a lot of evidence for that.” Sadly, Boyer is right and I suspect he’s right about the cause too: People do not like markets because people seem not to understand much about market economics. We don’t fully understand this antipathy, Boyer notes, because there hasn’t been much research on folk-economics, a study of “what makes people’s economic modules tick.” But I think Boyer...
Toward a Christian view of economics
Embed from Getty Images Many Christians assume that the Bible has nothing at all to say about economics, says theologian Albert Mohler, but a biblical worldview actually has a great deal to teach us on economic matters. Mohler outlines twelve theses for what a Christian understanding of economics must do. Here are three of them: 1. It must have God’s glory as its greatestaim. For Christians, all economic theory begins with an aim to glorify God (1 Cor. 10:31). We...
What does Lent tell us about markets and morality?
Embed from Getty Images The Christian season of Lent starts next Wednesday. Lent is a season of forty days, not counting Sundays, which begins on Ash Wednesday and ends on Holy Saturday. The period represents the forty days represents the time Jesus spent in the wilderness, enduring the temptation of Satan and preparing to begin his ministry. Lent is a time, says Margarita Mooney, when Christians engage in particular practices to remind ourselves of our nature as persons and our...
Temporary jobs have long-term effects on European youth
Ask any economist what the greatest force undermining prosperity is, and hewill answer with one word: uncertainty. But since economics is just human action, uncertainty hurts every aspect of peoples’ lives, upending their plans and delaying – or destroying – their dreams. In Europe, a growing number of young people are unable to engage in the rites of passage that marked the entrance of previous generations into adulthood – a subject Marco Respinti explores on the Religion & Liberty Transatlantic...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved