Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Advent lifts the veil of judgment and mercy in the divine economy
Advent lifts the veil of judgment and mercy in the divine economy
Jul 5, 2025 11:39 PM

Christians in the marketplace are motivated by more than profit. They seek also to be worthy of the public trust so as to avoid divine judgment.

Read More…

One of the more disturbing aspects of the way the market economy works is the ability of, at least some, participants to avoid responsibility for their decisions and actions. The manner in which this works is through the concepts of corporate personality and limited liability.

The corporation is deemed to have a separate legal personality. Consequently, pany can sue and be sued, enter into contracts, and be recognized as a separate legal person in its own right. There is what is called a “veil of incorporation,” which separates the members, shareholders, or owners of pany from the corporation itself. In essence, there is a cloak of invisibility behind which they hide. Added to this is the idea of limited liability—the concept that the members of a corporation are limited in their liabilities in the case of losses or bankruptcy to the amount invested. If you buy a share for $1, then that is the most you can lose even if pany goes into liquidation owing $1 million. One might think that these characteristics of the corporation enable individuals to avoid the responsibilities and consequences of their actions in the marketplace, sharing in the rewards but only to a very limited extent in the losses.

Nothing could be further from the spiritual and theological themes of Advent.

Advent lifts the veil. There is no hiding. Advent calls us before God. Advent encourages us to take responsibility for our actions. Advent reminds us of our accountability for our behavior. Advents teaches us faithfulness and discipleship.

Judgment is an Advent theme. When the Lord returns, he will sit on the throne of judgment. We will all bow the knee and give account for our lives and actions, regardless of role: business owner, executive or entrepreneur, investor, customer or supplier.

Christian observers have often seen the market as the place where we receive in this world the rewards and punishments that are a foretaste of the judgment e. The problem with too many (though not all) of the structures of corporate ownership is that they enable the rewards but not the punishments. Bankruptcy was seen as a natural punishment in the market for failed, misplaced, or corrupt business practices. Wealth was the reward but, of course, led to significant responsibilities. Bankruptcy was viewed with considerable negativity, for example, by the Quakers, who produced so many great business merchants, and usually led to expulsion from the Quaker meeting.

A particular problem was what came to be seen as the indiscriminate pursuit of wealth, reflecting a long-standing resistance among Christians, not to wealth itself, but to what one might call the arrogance of wealth. The arrival of limited liability (in the U.K. in 1856) may have encouraged this outlook.

Certainly, mainly evangelical preachers, writers, mentators in the 19th century objected to what Humphrey Lyttleton, in his Sins of Trade and Business: A Sermon (1874), referred to as “immoderate eagerness” for speculation and moneymaking and the “ravenous and insatiable, and ever-hurrying greediness in pursuit of it, this intoxication of love of it.”

He was not alone in the theme. The Reverend J.B. Owen, lecturing to the YMCA on Business Without Christianity, in 1855 noted how “fatally is wealth set up as a standard, as though it were the measure of right and wrong, greatness and meanness, virtue and vice.”

Montague Villiers, a noted evangelical preacher, in his 1853 lectures, Gold and Gold-Seekers: Lectures Delivered Before the YMCA, noted that “in the search for gold, the golden rule itself is forgotten.” Humphrey Boardman in The Bible in the Counting House in 1854 criticized luxury and extravagance, noting that the “money which is hurriedly made, is wastefully expended,” adding that the “contest for gain in the arena of business is carried forward as a race for ostentation in social life.”

Sin was sin. Business may indeed have been ordained by God, but its practitioners were not exempted from the judgment of both the invisible hand in the market and, ultimately, the visible hand of judgment.

The arrival of limited liability was problematic, certainly in England. An increase in fraud and unfair trade practices appears to have followed. Many Christians thought that the limitation of liability constituted the defrauding of the creditors of a pany. The right to make profits should surely mean unlimited responsibility for losses as well. For Christians it was a matter of accountability, reputation, honesty. Business failure represented divine judgment and was an essential part of a system in which economic sin would be atoned for through bankruptcy.

The judgment seat, though, is also a mercy seat. Advent is dominated by themes that sit in creative tension with each other: waiting and anticipation, ing and ing, victory and sacrifice, judgment and mercy, even reward and punishment. Personal responsibility, being held to account for one’s actions in this world, presents an opportunity for repentance, forgiveness, and mercy. Most entrepreneurs fail before they succeed.

Reflecting the creative tension set up by Advent, the Christian has understood the market in terms of faithful discipleship in this world in preparation for the next, a “school of discipleship” or a field in which to exercise. This is entirely consistent with the themes of Advent. In other words, we learn in the market and apply our faith, our moral character and moral judgments, to the market. We model and demonstrate Christian behavior and Christian truth. This is seen in the way in which the market deals with the idea petition. There are numerous benefits petition in pricing and resource allocation, but the benefits do not accrue equally. For the Christian, the appropriate response to wealth is the responsibility toward those in need. This reinforces the idea that our time on earth, an idea reflected in the themes of Advent, is a time of probation, testing, and discipleship.

This was all well summarised by James Baldwin Brown in his 1855 lecture on The Young Man’s Entrance Upon Life and Commencement of Business, in which he argued:

I would that you young men would enter into business with the resolution to take the whole of your moral nature into it with you … to make it a school of moral discipline.

We will investigate more fully the ideas of call and calling further in our final Advent piece next week. This theme, however, of bringing the Christian moral character to bear upon the market and the business enterprise lies at the heart of our Advent reflections. One writer, J.B. Owen, whom we mentioned earlier, described business without Christianity as like trying to navigate an unknown sea without any aids of navigation.

The idea of discipleship, though, surely is also intended to lift the heart, raise the vision, to be concerned for the welfare of others. Thomas Gisborne, in his Enquiries into the Duty of Men, in 1795 referred to the Christian businessman as looking beyond “his own emolument and advantage.” He gave the example of a banker who should “exert himself in doing good by benevolent loans,” which would do more good than simple philanthropy. The accepting of small deposits was part of this responsibility.

The quest for unmitigated integrity in trade, however, carries a price for Christians in business. They face scorn and ridicule for standing up for their principles, because this means that their policies and actions must be beyond reproach and a witness to munity at large, and are almost always under scrutiny. Herbert Spencer, in his The Morals of Trade (1874), sums the matter up:

When not only the trader who adulterates or gives short measures, but also the merchant who overtrades, the bank-director who countenances an exaggerated report, and the railway-director who repudiates his e to be regarded as of the same genus as the pickpocket, and are treated with like disdain; then will the morals of trade e what they should be.

Disciplined moral behavior was not restricted to the narrowly legal.

May the Lord bless you in this time of Advent.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Zingers for Zinn
In an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal, David J. Bobb examines the way in which Howard Zinn has been elevated by Hollywood and the academic left to make “the late Marxist historian more influential than ever.” Bobb, the director of the Hillsdale College Kirby Center for Constitutional Studies and Citizenship in Washington, begins with the campus furor that erupted among Zinn supporters when former Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels, now president of Purdue University, criticized Zinn after the historian...
Business Without Religious Liberty: Where Profit Is King
The Obama administration and several courts have effectively said that religious freedomdoesn’t apply to money-makers — at least, not when es to purchasing abortion-inducing drugs for your employees. In a recent piece for USA Today, Mark Rienzi, author of a marvelous paper on the relationship between profit-making and religious liberty, argues that drawing the line on “for-profit” vs. “non-profit” is a mistake for anyone who believes “conscience” belongs in business. Offering a brief summary of the more recent demonstrations of...
Are Cities For Families?
At City Journal, authors Joel Kotkin and Ali Modarres wonder if the modern city can still be a place for families, or if cities are now only for the childless. They point out that, historically, cities were based on family life, right up until the last century or so. Then, the suburbs happened: folks with children wanted more space, better public schools and cheaper housing. What they lost (access to the arts, culture, more extensive food choices) didn’t seem as...
New Book Looks at the Coptic Exodus from Egypt
In The Wall Street Journal, Michael J. Totten reviews Motherland Lost: The Egyptian and Coptic Quest for Modernity (Hoover Institution, 236 pages, $19.95) by Samuel Tadros. Totten says the book offers a scholarly account of the ongoing exodus of Christians from Egypt, where the “most dramatic” decline of Christianity in the Middle East is now occuring. Since the 2011 uprising that toppled Hosni Mubarak, Totten writes, “the rise of Islamists and mob attacks” have driven more than 100,000 Copts out...
Barbarians at the Gates of the DIA
The travails of Detroit’s bankruptcy and the implications for the Detroit Institute of Arts (DIA) continue to garner speculation about the place of art in society and the value of the DIA to the city, both now and in the future. Emergency manager Kevin Orr has “formally engaged Christie’s to appraise a portion of the city-owned multibillion dollar collection at the DIA.” John Fund at NRO has advised that even a limited number of paintings could be sold, keeping the...
What Happens When Congress Exempts Itself from the Laws They Pass?
According to James Madison, when lawmakers exempt themselves from the legislation they pass, “The people will be prepared to tolerate anything but liberty.” Over 1,200 organizations panies have already secured ObamaCare waivers. However, currently making big headlines is a deal worked out by the President and Congress that exempts congressional members and staff from the full effect of the law. In actuality, lawmakers had to go back and secure the hefty subsidies for Congress and staff as that was set...
Work, Wages, and the Art of Executive Stewardship
In light of the latest hubbub over the minimum wage, I recently wrotethat “prices are not play things,” arguing that we do ourselves and our neighbors no favors by trying to subvert and distort market signals according to arbitrary whims. Instead, I argue, we should reach beyond such low-ball thinking, focusing on creation and contribution rather than sitting and settling. Over at Think Christian, Jordan Ballor offers some related thoughts, including a helpful reminder that while prices matter, wages do...
Mass Marketing to Millennials: A Marxist Paradigm?
A recent Boston Globe headline reads: “Marketing to millennials can be a tough sell.” The article relates the differing approaches of Campell’s, Lindt USA, and GE when es to marketing to Millennials, highlighting a general skepticism and indifference toward advertising in the target demographic: For instance, marketing materials for GE’s Artistry series of low-end appliances featuring retro design touches, due out this fall, says it focuses on “the needs of today’s generation of millennials and their desire to uniquely express...
America’s Depressing Beliefs about the First Amendment
What do Americans know about the First Amendment? Since 1997, the First Amendment Center has attempted to find out by taking an annual survey of the “state of the First Amendment.” The results for 2013 are about as depressing as you’d expect: Americans were asked what they believed was the single most important freedom that citizens enjoy. The majority (47%) of people named freedom of speech as the most important freedom, followed by freedom of religion (10%); freedom of choice...
Citizens United, Capuchins, and Corporate Speech
When es to political contributions it seems those who lean left-of-center cannot petition, which – in large part – explains the hue and cry from the left since the U.S. Supreme Court Citizens United ruling. It’s all well and fine when unions, for example, or certain Hollywood hotshots flip a few million to the progressive cause or candidate du jour, but when a corporation wishes to defend the interests of its employees, shareholders munities it’s the basis for handwringing, rending...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved