Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 ways to talk about politics peacefully
5 ways to talk about politics peacefully
Jun 29, 2025 12:08 AM

This year, some families have little reason to give thanks, because political arguments have turned the holiday dinner table into a war zone. Friends, even relatives have cut ties with people who don’t share their political perspectives. Too often, flaring tempers quench the spirit of joy and brotherhood that should mark family gatherings.

The right way to respond isn’t to refuse to discuss politics and religion. It’s to talk about politics in a way that is worthy of Christians. These 5 steps can bring peace to our discussions through the holidays and well beyond:

1. Before you speak, listen. The great philosopher Mortimer J. Adler of the University of Chicago told William F. Buckley Jr. on Firing Line that listening to the other side is the necessary foundation of any discussion. That towering intellect undoubtedly knew that he echoed the Apostle James, who said, “Let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God” (James 1:19-20). After listening, repeat an accurate summary of the other person’s argument – and make sure you got it right by asking, “Do I understand you to say…?” If necessary, invite clarification. Any argument deserves to be met in its strongest form, not a flimsy straw man.

2. When you finally speak, proceed with humility. Friends on the other side are merely repeating the best conclusion they can make with the facts that they have. We are all made of the same clay, and we need to have the humility to admit that, on issues not addressed by Scripture, we could very well be wrong. Therefore, we should remember that the Apostle Paul wrote, “Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man” (Colossians 4:6).

3. Don’t view the other person as an adversary. Unless you are on a debate stage or arguing in front of pany, your relationship with the other person is more valuable than winning an argument. This is especially true of family or old friends. Begin by stating your respect for the person. Mention your shared goal to make the world a better place and touch on any mon ground you have. Instead of trying to land a humiliating knockout punch, see the other person as your partner on a mutual pursuit of the truth. As the Bible says, “As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another” (Proverbs 27:17).

4. Frame your conversation around their values. Spouting off our opinions makes us feel good, but it does nothing to convince other people we’re right. As you speak, try to consider how the other person is processing the discussion and address the other person’s values. For instance, if he says he supports abortion because he believes in woman’s rights, you can respond by saying that abortion hurts women, and that an estimated 200 million girls have been aborted just because of their sex. If the other person says he’s a socialist because people could only support capitalism out of “greed,” you could respond that you support the free market because it produces the greatest amount of wealth and the highest living standards for the poor. When you speak to their values, you begin a dialogue that can lead to conversion.

5. Don’t expect an instant conversion. Our society makes it easy to hermetically seal ourselves off from opposing views. For instance, Pew Research found that 4 of 10 Americans in both parties say they don’t have a single friend who supported the opposing presidential candidate. That means that meeting you may well be the first time the other person has ever encountered your worldview – especially if it is a Christian perspective. Your conversation may only be intended to plant a seed. At the end, reaffirm mon ground, thank the person for agreeing to explore these issues together, and express hope that the conversation will continue. As St. Paul wrote, “If it be possible, as much as it lies within you, live peaceably with all men” (Romans 12:19).

Following these steps does not guarantee that your friends or family will respond in kind. But they might and, in time, they may share your goodwill and respect with other people. One day, you may be remembered as someone who helped“raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach” (Isaiah 58:12).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
A Federal Tax Receipt
There’s an old saying to the effect: “Show me a man’s checkbook and I’ll show you what’s important to him.” It may not be quite the same as a checkbook, but NPR’s Planet Money passes along what a receipt from the federal government might look like for an average taxpayer (HT): As Third Way, who put together the taxpayer receipt, argues: An electorate unschooled in basic budget facts is a major obstacle to controlling the nation’s deficit, not to mention...
Samuel Gregg: Europe’s Broken Economies
Acton’s Research Director in the American Spectator: Europe’s Broken Economies By Samuel Gregg During September this year, much of Europe descended into mild chaos. Millions of Spaniards and French went on strike (following, of course, their return from six weeks vacation) against austerity measures introduced by their governments. Across the continent, there are deepening concerns about possible sovereign-debt defaults, stubbornly-high unemployment, Ireland’s renewed banking woes, and the resurgence of right-wing populist parties (often peddling left-wing economic ideas). Indeed, the palpable...
German Freedom and the Danger of Socialism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, I remember German reunification and reflect on its relevance for the present. Twenty years ago this Sunday, East and West Germany reunited, capping one of the most extraordinary transformations in modern history. Communism in the Soviet Union and its eastern European satellites had collapsed; the oppressed nations of Europe rejoined the “free world.” My generation was the last to straddle the two worlds, pre- and post-Soviet Union. When I was in elementary and high school,...
Global Warming Consensus Alert: KILL ‘EM ALL
I’ll admit – it’s been a long time since I’ve posted a Global Warming Consensus Alert because, frankly, any “consensus” that existed was blown apart by the release of the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit e-mails, which revealed a whole bunch of underhanded activity on the part of scientists promoting the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis. What’s the point anymore? The unshakeable climate “consensus” has been shown to be the fraud that it always was, and the catastrophic climate...
Mere Comments: The Neo-Anabaptist Temptation
Today at Mere Comments I highlight what I’m calling the “Neo-Anabaptist temptation.” Check it out. ...
The Main Battle
In the “Wealth Inequality Mirage” on RealClearMarkets, Diana Furchtgott-Roth looks at the campaign waged by “levelers” who exaggerate and distort statistics about e inequality to advance their political ends. The gap, she says, is the “main battle” in the Nov. 2 election. “Republicans want to keep current tax rates to encourage businesses to expand and hire workers,” she writes. “Democrats want to raise taxes for the top two brackets, and point to rising e inequality as justification.” This is a...
Almshouses in Europe from the Late Middle Ages to the Present
An interesting call for papers from H-Net, “Almshouses in Europe from the late Middle Ages to the Present – Comparisons and Peculiarities”: Within the field of poor relief and welfare, research interests have recently shifted towards the history of private charity and charitable foundations. Among these institutions, which contributed to the early modern and modern mixed economy of welfare, the almshouse played an important role as a particular form of social housing. Almshouses originated in the Middle Ages and many...
The Christian Market?
Joe Carter discusses “What the Market Economy Needs to Be Moral” today over at First Things: On the Square. He rightly points to the twin errors of collectivism and atomistic individualism, each of which have been soundly criticized in Catholic Social Teaching, for instance. I do wonder, though, given that Joe acknowledges the role of free individuals (not to be abstracted from their social relationships and responsibilities, of course) whether we need a “third way” as he proposes, or simply...
Of Miracles and Means
Last week I linked to Joe Carter’s On the Square piece, “What the Market Economy Needs to be Moral,” challenging his view that we need a “third way.” He has since clarified his position, and noted that what he wants is not really an alternative to the market economy but an alternative grounding, view of, and justification for the market economy. This is a position with which I wholeheartedly concur. Today I want to highlight something else from Carter’s helpful...
Review: Whittaker Chambers
Whittaker Chambers began Witness, the classic account of his time in the American Communist underground, with the declaration: “In 1937, I began, like Lazarus, the impossible return.” The line was most of all a deep recognition of the power of God to redeem what was once dead. Witness was a landmark account of the evils of Communism but most importantly a description of the bankruptcy of freedom outside of the sacred. “For Chambers, God was always the prime mover in...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved