Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 ways to talk about politics peacefully
5 ways to talk about politics peacefully
Jan 13, 2026 12:20 AM

This year, some families have little reason to give thanks, because political arguments have turned the holiday dinner table into a war zone. Friends, even relatives have cut ties with people who don’t share their political perspectives. Too often, flaring tempers quench the spirit of joy and brotherhood that should mark family gatherings.

The right way to respond isn’t to refuse to discuss politics and religion. It’s to talk about politics in a way that is worthy of Christians. These 5 steps can bring peace to our discussions through the holidays and well beyond:

1. Before you speak, listen. The great philosopher Mortimer J. Adler of the University of Chicago told William F. Buckley Jr. on Firing Line that listening to the other side is the necessary foundation of any discussion. That towering intellect undoubtedly knew that he echoed the Apostle James, who said, “Let every man be swift to hear, slow to speak, slow to wrath: For the wrath of man worketh not the righteousness of God” (James 1:19-20). After listening, repeat an accurate summary of the other person’s argument – and make sure you got it right by asking, “Do I understand you to say…?” If necessary, invite clarification. Any argument deserves to be met in its strongest form, not a flimsy straw man.

2. When you finally speak, proceed with humility. Friends on the other side are merely repeating the best conclusion they can make with the facts that they have. We are all made of the same clay, and we need to have the humility to admit that, on issues not addressed by Scripture, we could very well be wrong. Therefore, we should remember that the Apostle Paul wrote, “Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer every man” (Colossians 4:6).

3. Don’t view the other person as an adversary. Unless you are on a debate stage or arguing in front of pany, your relationship with the other person is more valuable than winning an argument. This is especially true of family or old friends. Begin by stating your respect for the person. Mention your shared goal to make the world a better place and touch on any mon ground you have. Instead of trying to land a humiliating knockout punch, see the other person as your partner on a mutual pursuit of the truth. As the Bible says, “As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another” (Proverbs 27:17).

4. Frame your conversation around their values. Spouting off our opinions makes us feel good, but it does nothing to convince other people we’re right. As you speak, try to consider how the other person is processing the discussion and address the other person’s values. For instance, if he says he supports abortion because he believes in woman’s rights, you can respond by saying that abortion hurts women, and that an estimated 200 million girls have been aborted just because of their sex. If the other person says he’s a socialist because people could only support capitalism out of “greed,” you could respond that you support the free market because it produces the greatest amount of wealth and the highest living standards for the poor. When you speak to their values, you begin a dialogue that can lead to conversion.

5. Don’t expect an instant conversion. Our society makes it easy to hermetically seal ourselves off from opposing views. For instance, Pew Research found that 4 of 10 Americans in both parties say they don’t have a single friend who supported the opposing presidential candidate. That means that meeting you may well be the first time the other person has ever encountered your worldview – especially if it is a Christian perspective. Your conversation may only be intended to plant a seed. At the end, reaffirm mon ground, thank the person for agreeing to explore these issues together, and express hope that the conversation will continue. As St. Paul wrote, “If it be possible, as much as it lies within you, live peaceably with all men” (Romans 12:19).

Following these steps does not guarantee that your friends or family will respond in kind. But they might and, in time, they may share your goodwill and respect with other people. One day, you may be remembered as someone who helped“raise up the foundations of many generations; and thou shalt be called, The repairer of the breach” (Isaiah 58:12).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
From Trash to Treasure
Last week I linked to this R&L item, “The Leaky Bucket: Why Conservatives Need to Learn the Art of Story.” And two weeks ago, I discussed the relationship between environmental stewardship and economics. You may recall that the first story featured in Acton’s Call of the Entrepreneur documentary is that of Brad Morgan, a Michigan dairy farmer. Faced with huge costs to dispose of cow refuse, Morgan’s entrepreneurial vision took hold: “His innovative solution to manure disposal, turning it into...
Tony Snow in CT
In the July issue of Christianity Today, White House spokesman Tony Snow offers a moving account of his struggle with colon cancer in “Cancer’s Unexpected Blessings.” Snow, who delivered the keynote speech at the 2001 Acton Annual Dinner, wrote this in response to CT’s question about “the spiritual lessons he has been learning through the ordeal.”: The moment you enter the Valley of the Shadow of Death, things change. You discover that Christianity is not something doughy, passive, pious, and...
Call of the…
Garbling difficult (and sometimes easy) words is mon and often humorous occurrence among children, as any parent can attest. My daughter did so serendipitously the other day, pronouncing Acton’s film production as “The Call of the Entre-manure.” As chance would have it—and as those who have seen the film or its trailer know—one of the documentary’s stories is about a dairy farmer who turned his animals’ waste into a profitable business. I wondered if Brad Morgan might like to take...
Retribution and Forgiveness
Richard John Neuhaus, over at the First Things blog On The Square, posts an excerpt from the ing print edition that excoriates the NAB translation (also noted at Mere Comments). Neuhaus writes of Jesus’ answer in Matt. 18:22 to Peter’s question, “Lord, how many times shall I forgive my brother when he sins against me? Up to seven times?” that “Jesus obviously intended hyperbole, indicating that forgiveness is open-ended. Keep on forgiving as you are forgiven by God, for God’s...
Nothstine in CSM on the ‘ethanol quick fix’
Ray Nothstine’s mentary on the the ethanol boom and its impact on the poor was published today in the Christian Science Monitor as, “The unintended consequences of the ethanol quick fix.” His timely article was also picked up by a slew of other newspapers and Web sites, including the Bakersfield Californian, the Fresno Bee and the Atlantic City Press. ...
Marxist Narrative and the Rule of Law
If you haven’t checked out this piece in the most recent issue of Religion & Liberty, you owe it to yourself to do so: “The Leaky Bucket: Why Conservatives Need to Learn the Art of Story,” by David Michael Phelps. In this essay, Phelps makes the claim, “While conservativism is now a powerful force in the American political landscape, it is still the underdog in a war of connotation. (This is evident in the fact that the phrase passionate conservative’...
Bonaventure, A Defence of the Mendicants
Readings in Social Ethics: Bonaventure, A Defence of the Mendicants (selections), in From Irenaeus to Grotius: A Sourcebook in Christian Political Thought 100-1625, ed. Oliver O’Donovan and Joan Lockwood O’Donovan, pp. 312-19. The references below are to section number. Bonaventure cites a number of authorities in his exposition, including Augustine, Jerome, Bede, Rabanus Maurus, Gregory the Great, and Bernard of Clairvaux.The apostolic way of life is described as consisting in “models of perfection,” and therefore imposing “no obligation on those...
‘Business flight will hurt Arabs’
Acton’s Sam Gregg looks at the plight of Middle Eastern Christians in ‘Business flight will hurt Arabs,’ mentary published today in The Australian. Their plight is also the Middle East’s loss as the continuing out migration of Christians saps the economic vitality and entrepreneurial spirit of the region. Sam asks: So where are these Christian migrants going? The vast majority are migrating mercially oriented, business-friendly countries such as the US and Australia. In 2002, 63 per cent of Arab-Americans identified...
Anthony Bradley vs. John Edwards’ Poverty Tour
I wrote a ments explaining why John Edwards’ recent poverty tour may serve as good rhetoric but, in the end, demonstrates very poor economic thinking. His ideas essentially represent the failed “war on poverty” initiatives that came out of LBJ’s “Great Society” foolishness. It’s a 2007 remix of a few old, tired, played out ideologies. The programs didn’t work in the 70s and 80s and they won’t work if Edwards es president. Edwards wants to raise the minimum wage to...
Pro-Life Socialism?
For some reason, I had never thought about what pro-life socialist policies might look like. But today, Jim Wallis’s Sojourner’s blog covered a Los Angeles Times story about a strategy shift in the Democratic party to support a House bill “designed not only to prevent unwanted pregnancies, but also to encourage women who do conceive to carry to term.” Passed last week in the House with strong bi-partisan support, the bill provides millions of federal dollars to: • Counsel more...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved