Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 Facts about midterm elections
5 Facts about midterm elections
Oct 18, 2026 9:25 AM

Tomorrow is Election Day, when citizens of the United States go to the polls to elect a variety of public officials. This year is a midterm election (in contrast to both a Presidential election and “off-year” election years). Here are five facts you should know about midterm elections:

1. Midterm elections are the national elections in the U.S. that occur at the two-year midpoint of a president’s four-year term. Because members of the U.S. House of Representatives are elected for two-year terms and U.S. Senators for six-year terms, the all 435 House seats and one-third of Senate seats are decided at the midterm. Additionally, in 2018, the election will decide 36 state governorships and three U.S. territory governorships.

2. The party of the incumbent president tends to lose seats in Congress during midterm elections. Over the past century there have been 25 midterm elections. Of those, the incumbent president’s party has lost an average of 29 seats in the House and four seats in the Senate. The president’s party gained seats in both houses only two times: Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934 and George W. Bush in 2002.

3. Warren Harding lost the most House seats (77 in 1922), and Franklin D. Roosevelt gained the most (9 in 1934). FDR also gained the most Senate seats (also 9 in 1934) while his former vice-president, Harry Truman, lost the most (10 in 1946). Only two presidents—Ronald Reagan in 1982 and Bill Clinton in 1998—neither gained nor lost seats in the Senate. (Every president has either gained or lost in the House.)

4. Since the 1840s, voter turn out for the midterm elections has dropped relative to the years for a presidential election. For example, according to Pew Research, 57.1 percent of the voting-age population cast ballots in 2008—the highest level in four decades. Two years later only 36.9 percent voted in the midterm election. But some researchers believe focusing on the voting-age population distorts the picture because so many people living in the country are ineligible to vote. For instance, roughly 20.5 million U.S. residents aged 18 and over (8.5 percent) of the voting-age population, were non-citizens, while another 3.2 million couldn’t vote because they were in prison or had been convicted of a felony. By subtracting those people, and adding in the 4.7 million American citizens living overseas but still eligible to vote, the population in 2012 that was eligible to vote was an estimated 222.3 million. Based on that adjusted base, turnout in recent elections was rather higher: 61.6 percent in 2008, 39.9 percent in 2010 and 58.2 percent in 2012.

5. In the early decades after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, midterm elections typically drew more voters than presidential contests. At the time, most states only gave voting rights to property owners. Additionally, the federal government’s main power center was Congress rather than the presidency. As Pew notes, those conditions changed in the 1820s during theSecond Party System, when “most states repealed property qualifications, interest in politics soared as politicians increasingly appealed to ordinary people, and the parties directed much of their energy on capturing the White House after the disputed 1824 election (which John Quincy Adams won even though Andrew Jackson received the most votes).”

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Dalrymple: British aid to India only fuels corruption
You have to hand it to Theodore Dalrymple: he doesn’t mince words. In an August 2012 piece in The Telegraph, Dalrymple let it be known that British plans to continue international aid to India are a, well…bad idea: …our continued aid to India is nevertheless a manifestation of the national administrative, mental and ethical torpor, as well as petence and corruption, that is leading us inexorably to economic and social disaster. It is high time we stopped such aid, and...
Recessions and Recoveries
StanfordeconomistsRuss RobertsandJohn Taylor offer a helpful discussion potential GDP, recessions, and recoveries. parison of previous recession/recovery cycles to the most recent one helps to illuminate just how unusual (read: terrible) our current recovery has been. (Via: Cafe Hayek) ...
Food Stamps Use At All-Time High
Sign of the times of the day: Food-stamp use reached a record 46.7 million people in June, the government said, as Democrats prepare to nominate President Barack Obama for a second term with the economy as a chief issue in the campaign. [. . .] Food-stamp spending, which more than doubled in four years to a record $75.7 billion in the fiscal year ended Sept. 30, 2011, is the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s biggest annual expense. Republicans in Congress have...
Human Work as the Center of Catholic Social Teaching
Margarita A. Mooney considers how personalism has influenced the development of Catholic social doctrine: When people think of Catholic social teaching the first thing es to their mind may be the call to charity or solidarity with the poor, as exemplified by Mother Teresa of Calcutta. However, Gregg contends that for Wojytla/John Paul II, a proper understanding of human work is central to all Catholic social teaching. So what does John Paul II’s Laborem Exercens say about human work? I...
ResearchLinks – 09.07.12
Book Note: “Walzer, ‘In God’s Shadow: Politics in the Hebrew Bible'” Michael Walzer, In God’s Shadow: Politics in the Hebrew Bible. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012. In this eagerly awaited book, political theorist Michael Walzer reports his findings after decades of thinking about the politics of the Hebrew Bible. Attentive to nuance while engagingly straightforward, Walzer examines the laws, the histories, the prophecies, and the wisdom of the ancient biblical writers and discusses their views on such central political...
A Chair Fit for a King
Gideon Strauss, my friend and sometime debate-partner, is the executive director of the Max De Pree Center for Leadership at Fuller Theological Seminary, and this week marks the launch of the center’s Fieldnotes magazine, which aims to “provide examples and stories and practical wisdom from men and women who are intensely involved in the day-to-day work of managing businesses, non-profits, churches, and other organizations.” In his introduction to Fieldnotes, Strauss invokes the powerful image of sitting in a chair as...
The Greatest Weapon Against Child Poverty
To truly understand what a conservative believes, you must know what it is they want to conserve. Like many other Christians who identify as conservatives, my own answer to that question would be the same as that of Russell Kirk: The institution most essential to conserve is the family. Wherever you look—whether in the streets or the social science research—you’ll find confirmation that the breakdown of the family is correlated with societal ills such as children living in poverty. We...
Hippocrates and the Budget Deficit
Should we use spending cuts or tax increases to reduce the government’s budget deficit? New research suggests it depends on how much we like recessions: This paper studies whether fiscal corrections cause large output losses. We find that it matters crucially how the fiscal correction occurs. Adjustments based upon spending cuts are much less costly in terms of output losses than tax-based ones. Spending-based adjustments have been associated with mild and short-lived recessions, in many cases with no recession at...
Big Government’s Belongings?
Last night, there was a moment at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte that may have alarmed some. The line from a video produced by the host city of Charlotte, declared, “government is the only thing we all belong to.” While some have simply used the line as a reference point for partisan purposes, it needs to be widely discussed. I have to admit I found the words profoundly disturbing. Not because I blame Democrats as a whole but rather...
In God We Trust?
Video: At the Democratic National Convention, delegates opposed to adding language on God, Israel’s capital to platform shout, “No!” in floor vote. On Powerline, John Hinderaker quotes from a recent Rasmussen Reports poll to show that “Democrats, bluntly put, have e the party of those who don’t go to church.” Among those who rarely or never attend church or other religious services, Obama leads by 22 percentage points. Among those who attend services weekly, Romney leads by 24. The candidates...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved