Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
5 Facts about food stamp programs
5 Facts about food stamp programs
Sep 9, 2026 11:41 PM

Last week the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) proposed a measure it claims will close a loophole that allows states to make participants receiving minimal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) benefits automatically eligible to participate in USDA’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Acting Deputy Under Secretary Brandon Lipps said the proposed rule would result in saving an average of $2.5 billion per year.

Here are five facts you should know about food stamp programs like SNAP.

1. The first federal Food Stamp Program (FSP) began in 1930 and ended in 1943. The program allowed people on relief to buy orange stamps equal to their normal food expenditures. For every $1 worth of orange stamps purchased, 50 cents worth of blue stamps were received. Orange stamps could be used to buy any food while Blue stamps could only be used to buy food determined by the USDA to be surplus. Another pilot program ran from 1961 until 1964, when Congress passed the Food Stamp Act. The program grew from half a million participants in 1965 to a record high of 22.4 million people in 1981. (A new record high of 47.6 million people was reached in 2013.)

2. The FPS underwent numerous revisions throughout the 1970s and 1980s. One significant change was the Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT), a program first introduced in 1984, which provided benefits on a debit card rather than on paper stamps. EBT helped to reduce food stamp fraud by creating an electronic record of each food stamp transaction, making it easier to identify violations. The rate of food stamp fraud—primarily the exchange of food stamps for cash—dropped from nearly 4 percent in the 1990’s down to around 1 percent after EBT was fully implemented.

3. In efforts to counter the stigma attached to the term “food stamps,” Congress changed the name of the program in 2008 to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program or SNAP, and changed the name of the Food Stamp Act of 1977 to the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008. States were given flexibility to name the program on their own (at the time, 10 states already changed the names of their programs) but were encouraged to change the name to SNAP or another alternate name.

4. SNAP is the largest federal nutrition assistance program, in both participation and spending. Such programs are funded under the “Nutrition” section of the omnibus legislation passed every five years known as the farm bill (the latest bill was the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018). According to the Congressional Budget Office’s (CBO’s) projected costs at the time of the 2018 law’s enactment, the Nutrition title makes up approximately 76 percent of farm bill spending, and SNAP is the vast majority of the Nutrition spending. Approximately 95 percent of SNAP spending is for the benefits themselves, which are 100 percent federally funded., while administrative costs of eligibility determination are shared between the states and the federal government. As of 2018, the program cost $64.9 million for 40.3 million participants.

5. SNAP is designed primarily to increase the food purchasing power of eligible e households to help them buy a nutritionally adequate low-cost diet as determined by USDA guidelines. SNAP benefits are available for households that meet federal financial eligibility tests for limited monthly e (at or below 130% of the federal poverty level) and liquid assets ($2,000 per household). These rules, however, can be bypassed through the use of “categorical eligibility” for SNAP. Categorical eligibility provides states with the ability to modify federal financial eligibility rules. As of February 2018, 42 states utilized broad-based categorical eligibility, although several do so with an added limit on liquid assets. To be eligible for SNAP, a household must also fulfill requirements related to work effort and must meet citizenship and legal permanent residence tests.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Radio Free Acton: Greg Forster on the legacy of Whittaker Chambers, Econ Quiz on income inequality, Upstream on Ursula K. Le Guin
On this episode of Radio Free Acton, Paul Bonicelli, director of programs and education at Acton, and Trey Dimsdale, director of program outreach at Acton, speak with Greg Forster, director of the Oikonomia Network and visiting assistant professor of faith and culture at Trinity International University, on the legacy and modern relevance of Whittaker Chambers and his landmark book,Witness. Then, Dave Hebert, professor of economics at Aquinas college, joins us on the Econ Quiz segment to talkabout e inequality. Finally,...
Oxfam’s ‘little gods’ exploit the poor
In a tragic irony, Oxfam has demonstrated the injustice of a certain kind of inequality. The international charity, which is known for its annual report on e inequality, is mired in scandal involving sexual coercion by its employees, possible pedophilia, and lying to a government agency in order to maintain taxpayer funding. While responding to the 2010 Haitian earthquake, relief workers engaged prostitutes in living quarters furnished by Oxfam, paid for with charitable donations (and tax dollars). Some have alleged...
How entrepreneurship transforms a village
As we were walking down the street of a small village within Barahona in the Dominican Republic, we met a woman living in a humble home with her family. She had constructed a metal box out of scraps found discarded near her village, Algodon. On top of the box, she had a fire burning, and inside there was a large pan of yucca bread baking. It smelled delicious. This is precisely the type of person that the Acton Institute Poverty...
Around the Old World-Sea
Later today we’re having a book launch discussion about the latest volume in the Abraham Kuyper Collected Works in Public Theology, On Islam. This book is a selection from a travel narrative Kuyper published after he voyaged around the Mediterranean Sea in 1905-1906. For those who are unable to join us in Grand Rapids, the event will be available via a live stream and will also be archived for viewing later. For those interested in learning more about Kuyper’s trip,...
Video: Book Discussion on Kuyper and Islam
We’ve got video available of last week’s book launch discussion about Abraham Kuyper’s travels around the Mediterranean Sea. A portion of his travel record has been published as On Islam as part of the Abraham Kuyper Collected Works in Public Theology. James Bratt and Doug Howard, both of Calvin College and who edited the volume, were joined by the translator Jan van Vliet of Dordt College for a discussion which I moderated. Here’s the panel discussion: And the audience Q&A:...
Rev. Sirico: What I learned from Michael Novak
Today is the first anniversary of the death of Michael Novak. The theologian, scholar, and writer was one of the most influential Catholic thinkers of his generation, and an indefatigable champion of free enterprise, democracy, and liberty. During his life Novak was a prolific writer. In addition to being the author or editor of more than 50 books, he wrote a syndicated column that was nominated for a Pulitzer. He was also a teacher (he taught at Harvard, Stanford, SUNY...
Removing the scales: Peter Boettke on the public purpose of economics
Whenever a new economic policy is proposed or introduced, we are immediately confronted by a wave of pundits and pontificators, each offering their own spin on its real-world implications. Far too often, however, such analysis gives way to a flurry of passions: emotional, ideological, and otherwise. Which begs the question: What is the public purpose of the economist? According to economist Peter Boettke, it has to do with the illumination of truth, not only about market processes, but political processes,...
Riding the net neutrality see-saw
This week, I was one of menters consulted in Nicholas Wolfram Smith’s article “FCC Repeal of Net Neutrality Leads to Lively Fight” for the National Catholic Register. I think Smith did a fine job conveying my primary concern: But according to Dylan Pahman, a researcher and managing editor of Acton Institute’s Journal of Markets & Morality, one of the problems with the 2015 net neutrality regulations was that it gave the government far too much regulatory power over ISPs. At...
The Oxfam scandal is about more than sex
Oxfam released its internal report on the Haiti scandal Monday, exposing that the controversy enveloping the agency was deeper and more expansive than previously known. In addition to the details already made public, the report states that allegations of fraud, negligence, sexual harassment, nepotism, and accessing pornography on an puter led to four firings and three resignations. The figure at the center of the controversy, Haitian country director Roland van Hauwermeiren, was allowed to make a “phased and dignified exit,”...
Can capitalism be saved from conservatives?
“The diversity of American conservatism would astound those pundits, politicians, and critics who believe conservatism is a rigid ideology aimed at privileging the wealthy (and the white),” says Gregory L. Schneider in this week’s Acton Commentary. Peter Kolozi’s new bookConservatives Against Capitalism: From the Industrial Revolution to Globalizationshowcases a conservatism fortable with free-market capitalism — which adherents see as revolutionary and disruptive of tradition — and traces its origins from the antebellum South, to the election of Donald Trump, profiling...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved