Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
3 Modern Economic Lessons from an Ancient Tax on Windows
3 Modern Economic Lessons from an Ancient Tax on Windows
Jul 1, 2025 10:28 AM

King William III of England needed money, so in 1696 he decided to implement a new property tax. To make sure the tax was progressive (i.e., affected the rich more than the poor), the parliament devised a seemingly clever idea: they’d use the number of windows as an index for the value of a house.

The assumption was that larger homes, presumably owned by the wealthy, would have more windows than the houses of the poor. All a tax assessor needed to do to calculate the tax was walk around a building and count the windows. Ingenious, no?

In its initial form, the tax consisted of a flat rate of 2 shillings upon each house and an additional charge of 4 shillings on houses with between 10 and 20 windows, or 8 shillings on houses with more than 20 windows.

You can probably imagine what happened next.

As economistTim Hartford explains, a “fundamental error is the idea that architecture doesn’t respond to tax incentives.”

When William Pitt tripled the tax in 1797, thousands of windows were bricked or boarded up almost overnight. Later, the president of the society of carpenters in London told Parliament that almost every homeowner on Compton Street had approached him to reduce the number of windows. A new apartment building in Edinburgh was designed with an entire second floor filled with windowless bedrooms.

When [Charles] plained that the poor were being denied light and air, he wasn’t speaking figuratively. Poor people did not have to pay the tax out of their own pockets but their landlords did, and the poor dwelt in stuffy darkness as a result.

The effect of cutting off the light and air was that the health of the people living in homes with few or no windows deteriorated considerably. As Thomas Guthrie wrote in 1867:

In order to reduce the window tax, every window that even poverty could dispense with was built up, and all sources of ventilation were thus removed. The smell in the house was overpowering and offensive to an unbearable extent. There is no evidence that the fever was imported into this house, but it was propagated from it to other parts of town, and 52 of the inhabitants were killed.

plaints about the tax—Charles Dickens claimed that, “Neither air nor light have been free since the imposition of the window tax.”—it endured for 150 years.

So what can we learn from a tax that was repealed in 1851? The primary lesson is that people respond to incentives—and often in ways we wouldn’t have predicted.

A tax collector in 1700 might have considered it irrational to board up a window to save a few shillings. But that’s exactly what happened—often because the person paying the tax wasn’t always affected by the effect of avoiding it. Many landlords couldn’t simply pass on the tax to their renters; the people were simply too poor. Instead, they found it was cheaper to simply shut up the windows and avoid the tax altogether. The ill effects on the tenants was merely a unintended consequence.

And this leads to the second lesson: When the government increases the economic burden of the wealthy, it almost always affects the poor. We’ve seen this time and time again throughout economic history, from minimum wage laws to “luxury taxes.” Whenever the rich have to pay more they’ll eventually pass along the cost to those who can’t afford it.

The third lesson is the most unfortunate: Governments are loath to repeal bad economic policies even when it’s obvious that it hurts its poorest citizens. Preventing the bad policy before it’s implemented is sometimes the only way to keep it from affecting the poor for generations.

So the next time someone asks why you’re so opposed to increasing the minimum wage or taxes on yachts, tell them “Because of King William’s window tax.”

“Window”byAngel Xavier Vierais licensed underCC BY-ND 2.0

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Gaia’s Vengeance: The Caustic Cliché of Environmentalism
In this week’s Acton Commentary, Ryan H. Murphy asks, “Why don’t we bat an eye when extremists hope a pagan god will smite SUV owners?” TV Tropes, a Wikipedia-style website, catalogs many clichés of fiction, including this, which the site calls “Gaia’s Vengeance.” Some variation on this theme can be found in major Hollywood movies like The Happening, The Day After Tomorrow, and Avatar. To take a specific example, Kid Icarus: Uprising, a 2012 Nintendo 3DS video game that has...
Poet Christian Wiman: Getting Glimpses Of God
Former editor of Poetry magazine Christian Wiman struggles, like many of us, to make sense of suffering and faith. His struggle is poetic: God goes belonging to every riven thing. He’s made the things that bring him near, made the mind that makes him go. A part of what man knows, apart from what man knows, God goes belonging to every riven thing he’s made. In the following interview with Religion & Ethics Newsweekly, Wiman discusses his faith journey, his...
The Interior Freedom To Embrace What Is Coherent, Good, True, Beautiful
Archbishop William E. Lori of Baltimore is one of the Chairmen of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Committee for Religious Liberty. He recently celebrated what is known as a “Red Mass”, an annual event throughout the church for lawyers, judges, legislators and others in the legal profession, at St. Benedict Catholic Church in Richmond, Va. In his homily, he addressed issues of religious liberty pertinent to Americans today. First, he stressed the link between sound society and morality:...
The Good News About Global Poverty
Have you heard the good news about global poverty? The number of people living in abject poverty — defined as living on less than $1.25 per day — has been halved since 1990. Steve Davies of LearnLiberty explains how that happened and how in the near future we may be able to eradicate extreme poverty. ...
The Real Lesson of Prohibition
In 1919 Congress passed the Volstead Act enforcing the Eighteenth Amendment, prohibiting, for almost all purposes, the production, sale, and distribution of alcoholic beverages. There are two erroneous things everybody has learned from Prohibition, says Anthony Esolen: “First, it is wrong to try to legislate morality. Second, you cannot do it, for Prohibition failed.” The real lessons of Prohibition, though, go unheeded: That amendment inserted into the Constitution a law that neither protected fundamental rights nor adjusted the mechanics of...
Religious Activists Petition SEC for Greater Corporate ‘Disclosure’
“Byrdes of on kynde and color flok and flye allwayes together,” wrote William Turner in 1545. If he were with us today, the author might construct an interesting Venn diagram representing the activist birds scheduled to testify tomorrow before the Securities and Exchange Commission. But, rather than briefly overlapping sets of circles, the SEC witnesses for greater corporate prise one giant bubble of activists seeking to circumvent the U.S. Supreme Court Citizens United ruling, including Laura Berry, executive director, the...
Babysitting Via The Village Idiot
I live in a fairly small town. It’s probably a lot like the places many of you live: a handful of churches, a grocery store, a pharmacy, a hardware store, small businesses and restaurants plus the schools, public and private. Just by doing a Google search, I came up with nine day cares for children in our area. Yet, Nancy Pelosi thinks this isn’t enough. She wants universal childcare, just like Obama is giving us universal healthcare (and we all...
There is Still No Tea Party Movement
There was something wrong with Zhang’s dog. The Chinese man had bought the Pomeranian on a business trip, but after he brought it home he found the animal to be wild and difficult to train. The dog would bite his master, make strange noises, and had a tail that mysteriously continued to grow. And the smell. Even after giving the mutt a daily bath Zhang couldn’t bear the strong stink. When he could take it no longer, Zhang sought help...
Diversity Is The Basis of Society
In a recent review ofChristena Cleveland’sDisunity in Christ:Uncovering the Hidden Forces that Keep Us Apart,Paul Louis Metzger wonders, “What leads people to associate with those who are similar, while distancing themselves from diverse others? What causes us to categorize other groups in distorted ways?” I remember reading H. Richard Niebuhr’sThe Social Sources of Denominationalism early in my seminary career, and Niebuhr’s analysis made a very strong impression on my admittedly impressionable sensibilities. It was clear to me then, and still...
Get Your Hands Dirty: ‘Engaging Heavy Reading’
Today at Ethika Politika, John Medendorp, former editor of Calvin Seminary’sStromata, reviews Jordan Ballor’s Get Your Hands Dirty for my channel Via Vitae. He writes, Although Ballor’s book is very accessible, the reading is by no means “light.” I would call it “engaging heavy reading.” While the concepts are clear and the analogies riveting, Ballor has a way of putting so much into a sentence that it can take some time to work through his ideas. I found myself time...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved