Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
What did Emmanuel Macron offer the yellow vest protesters?
What did Emmanuel Macron offer the yellow vest protesters?
Jan 25, 2026 4:22 PM

After yellow vest protests raged in the streets of Paris for 23 consecutive weeks, French President Emmanuel Macron has responded with a package of tax cuts and decentralizing political reforms. Macron unveiled the proposals at the Elysée presidential palace in the first domestic press conference of since he took office.

The gilet jaunesprotests were named for the fluorescent yellow vests French motorists must wear when stopped at roadside; The New Republic likened the vests to “the armor of light” mentioned in Romans 13:12. Protests broke out last November over a proposed carbon tax hike and a government levy on diesel. Some protesters held signs that read,“Death to taxes” as they clogged traffic intersections.

Initially, Macron vowed he would“not change course, because the policy direction is right and necessary.”Though Macron relented and scrapped the carbon tax hike and increased the minimum wage by €100 ($113) a month, the protests morphed into a populist uprising against the self-described “Jupiterian” president. On Thursday a shriven president admitted his public persona is “always giving out orders, being hard, sometimes unfair,” before offering a package intended to assuage the movement well ahead of his possible 2022 re-election bid.

Here is what you need to know about his press conference:

Macron admitted the yellow vest protesters had ‘just’ concerns.

Macron has readily tied the movement to violence perpetrated by some of its fringe elements – a tactic he repeated on Thursday. However, he said Thursday that “I respect the yellow vests who came out into the streets at the beginning of this crisis.” Macron added that the protests reflected the nation’s “profound sense of fiscal, social, and provincial injustice,” and he did not want “the actions of some people eclipse the just demands that were … broadly supported.”

Macron offered $5.6 billion in tax cuts to the middle class.

Macron promised bination of tax cuts totaling €5 billion (approximately $5.57 billion U.S.). The plan will “cut taxes for a maximum number of citizens and especially those who are working, the middle-class,” Macron said. Prime Minister Édouard Philippe added that a “great national debate” – which has garnered two million ments and conducted munity meetings since January – “clearly shows us in which direction we need to go: we need to lower taxes and lower them faster.” Macron said the middle-class tax reductions would be offset by unspecified spending cuts, plugging corporate tax “loopholes,” and increased productivity.

A tax cut is overdue. Taxes consume a higher percentage of GDP in France than any other developed country, at 46 percent. There is room for spending cuts, since budget outlays take up 32 percent of French GDP – again, more than anywhere else in the OECD.

He defended his decision to abolish the wealth tax.

Macron stood by his decision to convert the nation’s wealth tax, the ISF, into a graduated national tax on real estate in 2017. “It was a reform tostimulate production, not a present for the rich,” he said. The wealth tax on those with €1.3 millionin assets, which socialist President François Mitterand introduced in 1982, imposed a net loss of €2.5 billion in 2017,accordingto Kedge Business School Professor Eric Pichet. Macron also placed a flat tax of 30 percent on capital gains – prompting Thomas Piketty to criticize the move publicly.

Macron, a former investment banker before ing Finance Minister under his socialist predecessor François Hollande, understands the importance of investment capital and productivity for the sluggish French economy. (Hollande, by contrast, said, “My real adversary … is the world of finance.”)

But Macron said Thursday he would evaluate the policy next year. “It will be re-evaluated in 2020. If it’s not efficient, we’ll amend it,” he said.

Macron promised to increase productivity…without changing the work week or early retirement age.

“We must work more. I’ve said it before,” Macron said during his address. “France works much less than its neighbors.” However, he said he would not touch France’s 35-hour work week, nor its retirement age of 62. The Financial Times hasspeculated this will cause him to scale back national holidays.

Macron promised to decentralize power from elite Paris to the countryside.

The president also said he would devolve power from the capital to more remote cities and villages, which have seen a steady drain of jobs and resources. Chief among these reforms will be scaling back the policy of dirigisme, essentially a highly centralized form of government intervention in the economy, radiating outward – and downward – from Paris. If implemented, this reform would be a rare and e example of subsidiarity.

Macron also vowed to “guarantee the access for all to health services and guarantee that no school or hospital will be closed without the mayor’s approval.”

President Macron will close the nation’s Ivy League school for government bureaucrats, the ENA.

Macron promised to close France’s elite finishing school for politicians, the École Nationale d’Administration (ENA), which has e a symbol of the perpetuation of cronyism. Macron signaled last week that he wanted to offer “chances to all of our young people on the basis of merit and not their social or family origins.” A full 70 percent of ENA students have parents in the cadres, or prestigious executive positions. “This is not a meritocratic system anymore,” Macron said Thursday. “We don’t need job-for-life protection.”

The nation’s free market advocates supported the reform, with caveats. “Yes, the removal of the ENA is a good measure, provided that the new administrative elites are trained and recruited differently,” wrote Agnès Verdier-Molinié, director of the think tank Fondation iFRAP, in Le Figaro. “France struggles to reform itself, because big [institutions] and unions almost always block” needed reforms.

Macron promised greater use of the civilian referendum and structural reform for Parliament.

President Macron wants to designate approximately one-fifth of Parliament seats to be elected by proportional representation, instead of a winner-take-all system like that of the United States. He said this will give greater representation to minority parties.

He also promised a greater role for citizens to call a referendum. But with an apparent eye on Brexit, he added, “I don’t believe in permanent referendums, because referendums don’t allow for difficult decisions at the time when they must be made.”

Macron promised to crack down on ‘political Islam.’

Macron singled out “political Islam” as the origin of “clannishness that has crept into some neighborhoods.” In those areas, some clerics, “in the name of religion, are pursuing a political project that wants to secede from our republic.”

Macron also proposed greater control of European borders.

Macron called on European nations to do a better job stopping illegal migration into the EU. “On the European level, we decided to mon borders,” he said. “It’s not working anymore.”

“To be ing, you need to have a house. So, we need borders,” he said. “We need borders to be respected. We need rules.”

Macron said that nations that refuse to enforce the EU’s border – and nations such as Hungary and Poland, which refuse to acceptthe quota of Middle Eastern migrants apportioned by Brussels – should be expelled from the Schengen area. “This is the basis upon which Schengen should be overhauled, even if it means having fewer states within Schengen,” he said.

How have the French people responded?

A poll found that 63 percent of the French public found themselves unconvinced by the conference, and only seven percent said Macron’s plans were “very convincing.” Les Républicains leader Laurent Wauquiez said the initiatives amounted to “marginal adjustments.” Socialist Party leader Oliver Faurecalled Macron’s “response small.” And Fondation iFRAP called his proposals a “poor harvest.”

Macron did not promise to run for re-election in 2022.

Macron, 41, is one of the most ambitious leaders in Europe. But after being swept into power in an historic election (over the massively unpopular National Front), his poll numbers have remained mired in the 20s or 30s, and both of his most recent predecessors have served only one term. He did not directly answer whether he will seek a second term, although there is little doubt about his intentions.

Macron misidentified the essence of French character.

“We are above all children of the Enlightenment. And it is from these debates, these deliberations, this capacity to contradict one another … that good solutions can emerge for the country,” Macron said in his address. “The art of being French is being rooted and universal, attached to history and origins but embracing the future.”

There seems to be something missing from his description of a nation once known as “the eldest daughter of the Catholic Church.”

Ironically, Macron had to postpone his speech one week, because the Notre Dame Cathedral fire broke out the morning that he was scheduled to give it. Apparently, even its smoldering ruins cannot draw Macron’s attention to the importance of faith to his country and to Europe as a whole.

French speakers can watch the press conference here.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Acton Commentary: From Crisis to Creative Entrepreneurial Liberation
A new study from the Kauffman Foundation shows how Americans are increasingly turning to entrepreneurship to pull themselves out of an economic crisis. “When individuals are truly free to exercise their talents and trade the production of their labor, without oppression from tyrants or the entanglements of unnecessary government ‘oversight,’ the net effect is mutually beneficial for society as a whole,” writes Anthony Bradley in this week’s Acton Commentary. Read mentary at the Acton website and share your response in...
Review: Joker One
It is appropriate that Donovan Campbell offers an inscription about love from 1 Corinthians 13:13 at the beginning of his book, Joker One: A Marine Platoon’s Story of Courage, Leadership, and Brotherhood. That’s because he has written what is essentially a love story. While there are of course many soldier accounts from Afghanistan and Iraq, some that even tell more gripping stories or offer more humor, there may not be one that is more reflective on what it means to...
PBR: Politics and Populism
Last week Arthur C. Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute, made the case for “ethical” populism. Speaking of the Tea Party phenomenon, he writes, the tea parties are not based on the cold wonkery of budget data. They are based on an “ethical populism.” The protesters are homeowners who didn’t walk away from their mortgages, small business owners who don’t want corporate welfare and bankers who kept their heads during the frenzy and don’t need bailouts. They were the...
Global Giving and Local Needs
This month’s Christianity Today features a cover package devoted to the challenge faced by non-profit ministries amidst the recent economic downturn. The lengthy analysis defies any easy or simplistic summary of the state of Christian charity. There are examples of ministries that are scaling back as well as those who are enjoying donations at increased levels. Compassion International and InterVarsity Christian Fellowship are cited as those bucking the conventional logic that giving to charities decreases during a recession. “So far,...
Acton Commentary: Entrepreneurship isn’t enough
Economists and business schools have, in recent decades, rightfully praised entrepreneurs for their ability to create wealth and transform entire industries. But there’s more to it than that, says Sam Gregg in mentary. “If taxes are high, property-rights unprotected, and corruption the norm, then the environment embodies major deterrents to wealth-generating entrepreneurship,” he writes. “Why would people risk being entrepreneurial when they can’t assume their ideas won’t be stolen or their profits arbitrarily confiscated?” Read mentary at the Acton Website...
Using ‘Human Rights’ to Squelch Free Speech
In the June issue of Reason Magazine, Ezra Levant details his long and unnecessary struggle with Canadian human rights watchdogs over charges that he insulted a Muslim extremist, who claimed to be a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad. This sorry episode also cost Levant, the former publisher of Canada’s Western Standard magazine, about $100,000. Read “The Internet Saved My Life: How I beat Canada’s ‘human rights’ censors.” (HT: RealClearPolitics). Levant sums it up this way: The investigation vividly illustrated...
Acton Commentary: End Times for Christian America?
Once again, sociologists and journalists are predicting the demise of Christianity as a major influence in the public life of America. Hunter Baker pokes holes in that theory, and observes that these persistent predictions ing from “those anxious for it to occur.” Read mentary at the Acton Website ment on it here. ...
What do our holidays mean to us?
[Editor’s Note: We e Ken Larson, a businessman and writer in southern California, to the PowerBlog. A graduate of California State University at Northridge with a major in English, his eclectic career includes editing the first reloading manual for Sierra Bullets and authoring a novel about a family’s school choice decisions titled ReEnchantment, which is available on his Web site. For 10 years Ken was the only Protestant on The Consultative School Board for the Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange...
Gregg on the Moral Environment of Entrepreneurship
In today’s Detroit News, Acton Research Director Samuel Gregg talks about the sort of “moral, legal and political environment” that must exist if entrepreneurs are to flourish. He applies these precepts to the very serious economic problems in Michigan, where Acton is located: … in the midst of this enthusiasm about entrepreneurship, we risk forgetting that entrepreneurship’s capacity to create wealth is heavily determined by the environments in which we live. In many business schools, it’s possible to study entrepreneurship...
PBR: Only as Good as the People
What’s wrong with populism? Nothing, necessarily. But, to hazard a tautology, populism is only as good as the people. I think this territory was covered pretty well by Alexis de Tocqueville, whose view was in turn covered pretty well by Sam Gregg in mentary of a couple weeks ago: “The American Republic,” Tocqueville wrote, “will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public’s money.” As Sam notes, Tocqueville cited the importance of religion...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved