Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Trump threatens to raise taxes on Americans to punish Mexico
Trump threatens to raise taxes on Americans to punish Mexico
Mar 17, 2026 10:13 AM

President Trump announced yesterday that beginning in early June he will increase taxes paid by Americans until “such time as illegal ing through Mexico, and into our Country, STOP.” If Mexico does not stop the inflow then Trump says he will increase the tax paid by Americans to 10 percent on July 1, 2019, 15 percent on August 1, 2019, to 20 percent on September 1, 2019, and to 25 percent on October 1, 2019. Americans will be required to pay the new tax until Mexico “substantially stops the illegal inflow of ing through its territory.”

Why is the president raising taxes on Americans in order to put pressure on Mexico? The short answer is because President Trump is economically illiterate. I don’t mean that as an insult; I mean it literally. The president simply doesn’t understand who pays tariffs, and has shown an unwillingness to learn the most basic truth about this form of taxation. Compounding the problem is that no one in his administration appears to have the courage or ability to prevent the president from harming the American economy.

The president also doesn’t seem to understand that the power of taxation is supposed to rest with the Congress. But his ignorance on that point can be blamed on Congress.

In 1977 Congress passed the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, whichpermits tariffs to be levied by the executive in the event of a national emergency originating from a foreign source. Trump said he was invoking the powers in the lawand would use his “sole discretion” to determine whether Mexico had taken sufficient action. This was not, of course, how the law was intended to be used. As Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said yesterday, “Trade policy and border security are separate issues. This is a misuse of presidential tariff authority and counter to congressional intent.”

Congress could quickly clarify their intent of the law, but they won’t. Aside from Grassley, most of the Republicans in Congress—especially in the Senate—are too craven to challenge the president on this issue. They would rather see America e poorer than stand up to Trump.

A prime example of how corrupt they’ve e is South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham. Two years ago, Graham wrote on Twitter, “Border security yes, tariffs no. Mexico is 3rd largest trading partner. Any tariff we can levy they can levy. Huge barrier to econ growth.” But that was when Graham was still a conservative. Yesterday he showed he has fully converted into a progressive-populists and now supports tariffs on Mexico. “I support President Trump’s decision to impose tariffs on Mexico until they up their game to help us with our border disaster,” Graham wrote on Twitter.

Unfortunately, Graham won’t be the only one to side with the forces of progressivism. Currently, there are almost no Republican members of Congress that are willing to fight for economic liberty. Even the so-called Freedom Caucus, a group that previously tried to get Trump to avoid tariffs, has shown no willingness to rein in our economically liberal president. One of their founding members, Mick Mulvaney, is now serving as Trump’s acting chief of staff and is helping to roll out the new taxes. In the past we’d expect someone like Mulvaney to resign his position rather than betray his principles. But there are few Republicans in Congress or the executive branch who have any principles they won’t betray, much less any who mitted to liberty. As the GOP has repeatedly shown over the past two years, their only concern is to hold on to power and appease the progressive-minded populist-nationalists within the party.

It would be easy to simply throw up our hands in disgust at our new liberal establishment. But their es at too high a cost, both here and abroad. Domestically, Trump’s policies of increased taxes threaten to harm the poor and speed our economy toward a recession. Internationally, Trump’s lack of integrity has made foreign powers hesitant to negotiate with him. Why should they trust a man who cannot be trusted to keep his word? How can any country (including America) expect a pletely lacking in honor to honor his trade deals?

I don’t believe this is representative of who we are as a nation. There are still many Christians in American who support conservative policies because they lead to human flourishing. In the past, that has often lead us to support Republican leaders who also claim to share our principles. But if the GOP is unwilling or unable to do what is right, why should we continue to support them? If they won’t stand against this imposition of unjust taxes on Americans, why should we stand with them?

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Radio Free Acton: Jordan Ballor on Why Abraham Kuyper Matters
On this edition of Radio Free Acton, we speak with Jordan Ballor, a general editor of the Abraham Kuyper Collected Works in Public Theology, a major series of new translations of Abraham Kuyper’s key works. We discuss the genesis and scope of the project, and examine what Kuyper has to say to modern Christians and why his contributions remain relevant a century after their initial publication. You can listen to the podcast via the audio player below. ...
The soul of the polis
In this week’s Acton Commentary, “Piety and Politics: The Church’s Social Responsibility,” I take up the Kuyperian distinction between the church conceived as organism and as institute and point out some ways in which such ideas can help us navigate the dangerous waters of social and political engagement. When the Letter to Diognetus describes the diffuse influence of Christians in the world, it uses the living imagery of the soul: What the soul is in the body, that Christians are...
Why is Russia restricting religious freedom?
Two months ago Russian president Vladimir Putin signed into law a number of “anti-terrorism” measures that limit missionary and evangelistic efforts and restrict the religious freedoms on non-Orthodox groups. As Christianity Today notes, to share their faith, citizens must now secure a government permit through a registered religious organization, and they cannot evangelize anywhere besides churches and other religious sites. The restrictions even apply to activity in private residences and online. Why is Russian taking implementing such constraints on believers?...
Pope Francis calls climate change a sin
Pope Francis recently referred to climate change as a sin in a message he gave on the world day of prayer. Research fellow at the Acton Institute, Dylan Pahman, had a lot to say about this in a new article at The Stream. mented on Francis’ message as well as analyzing the effects on the poor of some of the policy prescriptions that Francis has praised. He says: What seems to be lost on these hierarchs is what to do...
The rhythm of vocation: A challenge to ‘work-life balance’
“If all of our working and all of our resting serves the same vocation of love, why do we so often feel out of balance?” In a recent talkfor theOikonomia Network, author and church historian Dr. Chris Armstrong offers a fascinating exploration of thequestion, challenging mon Christian responses on “work-life balance” andoffering a holistic framework forvocation, service, and spiritual devotion. Recounting a situation where hehimself wasfaced with frustrations about work and family life, Armstrong recalls the advice he received from...
‘He needs us’: The missing ingredient in Western missions
More and more, Western churches are opening their eyesto the risks and temptations inherent in so-called “short-term missions,” whether manifested inour basic vocabulary, paternalistic attitudes, or reactionary service. As films like Poverty, Inc. and the PovertyCure seriesdemonstrate, ourcultural priorities and preferred solutions often distract us from the true identities and creative capacities of our neighbors. Paired with apassion to “do good,” and standing atop an abundance of resources, it’s easy toforget and neglect the importance of real relationship, holistic service,...
How much economic value does religion provide America?
How much value does religion add to the U.S. economy? According to a new study the effect of religion exceeds the revenue of the ten largest panies—including Apple, Google, Amazon, and bined. The study, recently published in the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion, provides three estimates of the value of faith to U.S. society. The first and most conservative estimate takes into account only the revenues of faith-based organizations falling into several sectors (education, healthcare, local congregational activities, charities,...
7 Figures: Income and poverty in the U.S.
Yesterday the U.S. Census Bureau released itslatest report on e and poverty in the United States. Here are seven figures from the report you should know about: 1. Real median household e increased 5.2 percent between 2014 and 2015—from $53,700 to $56,500. (This is the first annual increase in median household e since 2007.) 2. In 2015 the median e of a married-couple household was $84,626. For a female head of household (no husband present) the median e was $37,797....
The high cost of air pollution: trillions of dollars and millions of premature deaths
Air pollution is now the world’s fourth-leading fatal health risk, causing one in ten deaths in 2013. According to a new study by the World Bank, the premature deaths due to air pollution costs the global economy about $225 billion in lost labor e, or about $5.11 trillion in welfare losses worldwide. That is about the size of the gross domestic product of India, Canada, and bined, notes the report While we tend to think of air pollution as occurring...
The most surprising fact about American poverty
Every year, the U.S. es out with its report on es and poverty. And every year the same finding repeatedly surprises me. As economist David Henderson says, the report “always shows that there is mobility between e categories, even in the short run, and that poverty is temporary for most people in America who experience it. Virtually all reporters ignore it.” First, the bad news. The report reveals that during the 4-year period from 2009 to 2012, more than one...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved