Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Time to go, Gov. Sanford
Time to go, Gov. Sanford
Dec 11, 2025 1:11 PM

A reader makes a request:

My purpose for writing is simply to request the Acton Institute make a public statement on its website to repudiate Mr. Sanford’s actions, in large measure because he was prominently featured in Volume 18, Number 3 of Religion & Liberty journal. Of course your organization is not expected to guarantee moral behavior of its featured contributors simply because none of us knows what is really in the hearts and minds of our neighbor. Governor Sanford previously demonstrated he was a man of character and integrity, but even the most upright man is in danger of falling. My request is for the Institute to denounce Mr. Sanford’s actions in the same public manner it praised his approach to politics last summer, in order to assure its viewers that it is plicit with his actions.

If not exactly a denunciation, here’s an explanation for why we interviewed Gov. Mark Sanford. We opened the pages of R&L to the governor because of his record as a fiscal conservative and his willingness to talk about the way faith guided his public life. Here’s a sample of the interview:

R&L The religious views of candidates and their support among various faith traditions played a big role in the 2008 presidential race. Is this a good thing?

Sanford It is. But I don’t know if it was more window dressing than not. Obama had Rick Warren speak at the inauguration, and then got some guy of another persuasion to give the benediction. I don’t think you want it as an accoutrement. I think that you want it to show up in policy. In other words, conversation is certainly an important starting point. It can’t be the ending point.

Somewhere, that “deeds, not words” philosophy fell by the wayside. Yes, Gov. Sanford fell and fell hard. But he was lying to many people about his public life and private conduct. And we got taken in, too.

Now, we watch the sad spectacle of a politician clinging to power after he has obliterated any moral claim to continuing in office. He is refusing to go, and pares himself to Biblical figures.

About an hour after Mrs. Sanford talked of her pain and feelings of betrayal, her husband brushed aside any suggestion he might immediately resign, citing the Bible and the story of King David, who continued to lead after sleeping with another man’s wife, Bathsheba, having the husband slain, then marrying the widow.

“What I find interesting is the story of David, and the way in which he fell mightily — fell in very, very significant ways – but then picked up the pieces and built from there,” Mr. Sanford told members of his Cabinet in a session called so he could apologize to them in person and tell them the business of government must continue.

As a friend said about Sanford’s David and Bathsheba analogy: Doesn’t he realize it belongs to someone else to offer that kind of assessment?

Actually, the most enlightened, faith-inspired interpretation of this sad es from Jenny Sanford, the governor’s wife, who has shown admirable forthrightness in dealing with her husband’s very public meltdown:

I believe enduring love is primarily mitment and an act of will, and for a marriage to be successful, mitment must be reciprocal. I believe Mark has earned a chance to resurrect our marriage.

Psalm 127 states that sons are a gift from the Lord and children a reward from him. I will continue to pour my energy into raising our sons to be honorable young men. I remain willing to forgive pletely for his indiscretions and to e him back, in time, if he continues to work toward reconciliation with a true spirit of humility and repentance.

Campaign staffers who have worked with Jenny Sanford describe her as “an Old Testament woman with a 170 IQ.”

The Argentine woman Gov. Sanford was reported to be involved with spoke up recently. “It is not for me to judge anyone,” she said. “I leave it all in the hands of God.” Yes, indeed.

While we’re at it, allow me to add this, from Matthew 10:26: For there is nothing covered that will not be revealed, and hidden that will not be known.

Political calculations are now taking over. Some, like Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) want Sanford to stay, so long as he can reconcile his marriage. Others, like Minn. Gov. Tim Pawlenty, had a more severe assessment.

“Clearly, there’s been damage,” Mr. Pawlenty said on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “Any time you have leading figures who are engaged in behavior that is sad and troubling and hypocritical, other people are going to look at that and say, ‘Hmm, they don’t walk the walk.’ And so the words and the actions don’t ring true.”

In a Washington Times column appropriately titled “Corrupt Conservatives,” Jeffrey T. Kuhner observes that Sanford’s “act of pure folly” has squandered much of the good he did as an elected official:

His extramarital affair gave his enemies the political rope they needed to hang him finally. Whether or not Mr. Sanford resigns is irrelevant. He is spent as a national political force. His erratic and bizarre behavior – the weird claims that he was hiking on an undisclosed path along the Appalachian Trail; his rambling, confused news conference announcing his infidelity; and the steamy e-mails that have been published on the correspondence between him and his Argentine mistress – have doomed his chances as a Republican presidential contender in 2012. He has e a laughingstock.

Yet conservatives, too, are in his sinking ship.

Mr. Sanford is only one in a long line of Republican politicians who, while sounding like preachers and priests, have behaved like perverts and pimps. Sen. John Ensign of Nevada recently admitted to an extramarital affair with a former female staff member. Former Sen. Larry Craig of Idaho was brought down by a gay-sex sting operation in a Minneapolis airport. Sen. David Vitter of Louisiana was identified as a client of a Washington escort service (and faces a re-election challenge from – I’m not making this up – a former porn star who claims she is running to spotlight his hypocrisy). And, of course, there was former Florida Rep. Mark Foley, who was forced to resign after revelations of improper e-mails with teenage male House pages.

Kuhner, the president of the Edmund Burke Institute, a Washington-based think tank, says that “the American right is permeated with sanctimonious hypocrites who talk like traditionalists but live like libertines. At its core, conservatism is not simply a set of beliefs; it is a way of life – one that is anchored in the natural moral order centered on faith, family and freedom. This is the conservative holy trinity. And it is now being defamed by its own high priests.”

Although the Governor is, for now, refusing to go, we hope he reconsiders. He should resign, pack up and return to private life. That’s the least he should do for the people of South Carolina who once trusted him to be the man he said he was. Maybe, in time, he can start to put his life back together. That’s the best “ending point” he could possibly hope for now.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How a Cuban Ball Player Escaped Communism for the Majors (and Much More)
Three years ago, Dalier Hinojosa was making the equivalent of $5 to $20 per month playing baseball in the state-run Cuban league. Having nowdefectedfrom the country, escaping first to Haiti and now to America, Hinojosa will make $514,000 this season, playing for the Phillies. In a profile at , we learn more about the trials of his journey, which involved a high-risk, 12-hour escape at sea, joined by his wife and a smuggler in a small motorboat: You never think...
The Pope’s Limited Influence on Foreign Affairs
Pope Francis has made support for migrants and refugees a priority of his pontificate, and has encouraged nations to adopt an open-door immigration policy. But few countries, especially in Europe, appear interested in adopting his approach, underscoring just how limited an influence thepope has on foreign policy. A recent article in the Wall Street Journal highlighting the pope’s inability to stronglyaffect geopolitical affairs quotes Kishore Jayabalan, director of Acton Institute’s Rome office and a former Vatican policy analyst: Starting with...
Minimum Wage Advocates: ‘Sure a $15 Wage Will Increase Unemployment. So What?’
In almost every long-term clash over a cultural or political policy, es a point that I’d call the fort-level concession.” If the agenda of one side has been won — or has at least moved sufficiently toward achieving victory — the winning side often fortable making concessions about claims that they may have previously denied. Initially, they will firmly state, “The claims of our opponents are overblown; the detrimental effect they predict will never happen.” Once they’ve won the public...
Finding meaning and beauty as a fast food worker
“This is not what I thought I’d be doing at twenty-seven.” So says Stephen Williams, who, while enjoying and appreciating much of his daily work at his local Chick-fil-A, continues to feel the various pressures of status, mobility, and vocational aspiration. “I love pany, and I am grateful for the environment here and for the paycheck,” he writes in a series of stirring reflections. “But it’s humbling to tell many of my plished, high-flying friends that I am not currently...
Why We Should Oppose Both Skynet and Minimum Wage Increases
I oppose implementing Skynet and increasing minimum wage laws for the same reason: to forestall the robots. It’s probably inevitable that a T-1000 will return from the future to terminate John Connor. But there is still something we can do to prevent (at least for a time) a TIOS from eliminating the cashier at your local McDonalds. In Europe, McDonalds has ordered 7,000 TIOSs (Touch Interface Ordering Systems) to take food orders and payment. In America, Panera Bread will replace...
Hard Times for Free Trade
“Since the end of the World War II, American politicians of the left and right agreed that it was in the country’s and indeed the world’s interest to promote the lowering of trade barriers,” says Kishore Jayabalan in this week’s Acton Commentary. But are American populists now presaging a turn against economic globalization? It may not be surprising that avowed socialist Bernie Sanders is opposed to free trade, but who could have imagined that the wife of “new Democrat” President...
The God-Flies’ Big Conn
It’s been a while since your writer began reporting on religious shareholder activism in this space. The term “religious” is used here to describe the vocations of the priests, nuns, clergy and other religious involved in shareholder activism – rather than serving as an accurate descriptor for essentially progressive political and social activities. These shareholder activists pursue agendas having little to do with the true nature of the faiths they no doubt believe, but too often relegate beneath their pursuit...
Just because something’s popular doesn’t make it prudent
Along with “democratic socialism,” “protectionism,” and “Berning,” the word “populism” has e part of 2016 America’s vernacular thanks to the circus that is the presidential election. Like it sounds, “populism” deals with popularity, in this case among American voters. In a new op/ed for the Detroit News, Samuel Gregg explains why populism will absolutely not make America great again. This isn’t the first time populism has appeared in American or world history. “It often manifests itself,” Gregg argues, “whenever enough...
Right and Wrong as a Clue to the Meaning of the Universe
During World War II, when Britain was fighting against the evils of Nazism, the director of religious programming at the BBC, asked C.S. Lewis to give some talks about faith. The Oxford professor reluctantly agreed, and on August 6, 1941, at 7:45 in the evening he gave his first broadcast. This first broadcast on right and wrong would go on to e the most read radio series in British broadcasting history, and was used as the first chapter of Mere...
A Simple Tool for Measuring Economic Well-Being
Is the average American better off today economically than they were 4 years ago? What about 40 years ago? How would you go about answering those questions? In this video economist Alex Tabarrok explains the difference between nominal and real GDP and shows us a simple tool that can help us determine if our economic well-being as a nation is increasing or decreasing. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved