Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
This billionaire from Hong Kong is standing up to China’s oppression behind bars
This billionaire from Hong Kong is standing up to China’s oppression behind bars
May 13, 2026 2:55 PM

Jimmy Lai remains strongly rooted: first in his fervent Catholic faith, and second in his unshakable support of freedom.

Read More…

Hong Kong was once a beacon of opportunity, of democracy. It was a political refuge, a blip in a territory controlled munist China.

Seemingly overnight, 7.5 million Hong Kongers have had their freedoms stripped from them by an oppressive Chinese regime intentsilencing any voice of dissent — and that doesn’t mean revoking the odd Twitter account. It means imprisonment and death.

In spite of this risk, Hong Kong’s most prominent billionaire, Lai Chee-ying, better known as Jimmy Lai, has given up a life fort to e a dissident.

“All I have, this place gave me,” Lai said of his beloved Hong Kong.

Lai sought the light of Hong Kong as a young man, munist China as a 12-year-old refugee with nothing. After gettingoff the boat Lai immediately went to a textile factory, where he worked and slept.

He was poor. He was free. He was happy.

For the first time in his life, Lai knew he had a future. He capitalized on the abundance of opportunities Hong Kong presented him, and by age 59, Lai was a billionaire. He accrued his wealth by building a wildly successful clothing and media businesses.

But as the threat of Chinese control over all aspects of life in Hong Kong grew more and more dire, Lai knew that his was not the legacy he needed to preserve — it was Hong Kong he needed to fight for.

“If I go on making money, it doesn’t mean anything to me. If I go into the media business … I can deliver choice. And choice is freedom,” Lai said.

He’s been arrested three times. Apple Daily, the newspaper that Lai built from the ground up and that became the leading pro-democracy voice in Hong Kong, has been shuttered for violating far-reaching Chinese Communist Party rules that allow the CCP to silence dissent.

Lai could have kept his billions and spent his retirement enjoying the fruits of his labor. As a citizen of the United Kingdom, he could have fled Hong Kong altogether. Instead, he chose to fight.

And it’s a fight that matters, not just for the 7.5 million Hong Kongers whose freedoms have been stripped from them, but also for the world.

The specter of munism has failed to capture the attention of average Americans, perhaps because of that country’s distance from their everyday lives, or perhaps, ironically, because its goods are so pervasive that e to see China as an inevitable part of their lives. But anyone who cares about human rights cannot ignore the CCP’s absolute disregard for the value of human life.

The People’s Republic of mits genocideagainst the Uighurs, an ethnic minority of Muslims that has been forced into slave labor and re-education camps.

The CCP has squelched any semblance of freedom of speech among its own people, frequently rounding up dissenters and anyone deemed problematic, jailing or killing them.

Lai fled this terror when he hopped in the bottom of a boat heading for an unknown place decades back. But now that terror is back and worse than ever.

Lai has participated in many protests against the CCP and always had one requirement: He wanted to stand in the front, where officials could see him.

Today, Lai fights for his freedom from behind bars. On Dec. 13, he was sentenced to 13 months in prison over his participation in a banned vigil for the victims of the Tiananmen Square massacre. This is on top of the 14-month sentence he received on May 28 for helping to organize an unauthorized pro-democracy rally, and in addition to the six months he had already served.

He is still awaiting a third trial for alleged violations of the CCP’s national security laws, which are so broad as to allow the government to use them in any way it sees fit to silence dissent.

Nevertheless, Lai remains strongly rooted: first in his fervent Catholic faith, and second in his unshakable support of freedom.

The Chinese government wants him silenced, but Jimmy Lai’s fight in Hong Kong is far from done.

“Even if they kill me, I will fight to the last day,” Lai said.

This article originally appeared in The Detroit News on Dec. 30, 2021

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
How about making it a permanent internship?
Every morning I make a point checking out for unintentionally hilarious news about the workings of the EU bureaucracy. Yesterday there was this article about an internship program with a twist. Instead of ing to Brussels, this one is designed for 350 EU senior officials to spend time with small- and medium-sized businesses in member states. “We don’t need an ivory tower mented Mr Verheugen, suggesting that by acquiring such a “hands-on experience” in SMEs, mission’s administrators will understand their...
Cyber Communication
Ever since the popularization of the Internet, a debate has raged—within and without Christian circles—about the effect of the medium on human development and relationships. A serious and plausible charge against the Web came from those who thought its mode of munication would alter the form of human interaction for the worse. (See, for example, Quentin Schultze’s Habits of the High-Tech Heart, reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality by Megan Maloney.) As is usually the case with new...
Government and the Decline of Urban Catholicism
Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett wrote an outstanding piece for USA Today. He argues convincingly that the large-scale and widespread withdrawal of Catholic institutions from many of the nation’s cities has ramifications that extend beyond the interests of Catholics alone. He notes, too, that government has a role to play in facilitating the flourishing of religious institutions such as Catholic churches and hospitals—mainly by honoring a properly understood separation of church and state: Is there anything the government and...
Nipsey Russell on Social Security
Nipsey Russell (1918-2005) I was flipping stations tonight and passed the Game Show Network, which was showing reruns of Match Game ’74. Nipsey Russell, the so-called “Poet Laureate of Television,” began the show with this poem for prosperity: To slow down this recession, and make this economy thrive, give us our social security now, we’ll go to work when we’re sixty-five. ...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wednesday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 12, 2006 – Yesterday I outlined in brief a biblical case for the legitimate and even divine institution of civil government. Having established that the State is a valid social institution, the next step in what is broadly called social ethics is to outline the scope of the State’s authority and its relations to other social institutions. A valuable place to start might be in defining what the role of the State ought to be, rather than...
Charity vs. Philanthropy
Philanthropy, for all its good intentions, does not necessarily imply a personal connection with the needy person. It can and often does, but it doesn’t have to. Philanthropy is the more institutional, “big-picture” cousin of charity, which is the personal and direct connection to those in need. Andrew Carnegie building hundreds of libraries with the wealth he made in the steel industry, and being celebrated for it to this day, is philanthropy. Your Aunt Evelyn volunteering at the local church-operated...
World Cups of Philosophy and Theology
For those of you who are going through World Cup withdrawal after the defeat of the French by the Azzurri have a fort. I give you the World Cups of Philosophy and Theology. ‘Nobby’ Hegel leads the Germans onto the pitch. The first is a two-part video of the Monty Python skit featuring German philosophers against the Greeks (text here). The German side touts Leibniz in goal with strikers Nietzsche and Heidegger. The Greeks have Plato in net, with Aristotle...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wrap-up Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 13, 2006 – Over the course of the week I have offered my reflections that have arisen within the context of the Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar offered by the Institute for Humane Studies (previous editons: Weekend, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday). The presentations by the faculty have been in great part engaging, intellectually rigorous, and valuable. I’ll conclude with an observation about the necessity for any intellectual endeavor to pursue scholarship in a rigorous and serious way. This...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 5
In Part 4, we saw that post-Enlightenment philosophical currents such as Humean empiricism, utilitarianism, and legal positivism are the real culprits in the demise of natural law and not theological criticism from within Reformation theology, as many today take for granted. If this is so, why is contemporary Protestant theology so critical of natural law? The mon reason why contemporary Protestants reject natural law is because they think it does not take sin seriously enough. And the second, which we...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 4
In Part 3, we examined why many contemporary Protestants have something of a bad conscience when es to natural law. But, of course, the blame for this cannot be laid fully upon Karl Barth. Even a hint of a fuller explanation has to address intellectual currents that begin to gather momentum in the so-called Enlightenment. One popular explanation within the academic mainstream for the demise of the natural-law tradition in modern Protestant theology attributes it to a form of implosion....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved