Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
‘They want to punish the Church’: Italian priest fined for procession to fight coronavirus
‘They want to punish the Church’: Italian priest fined for procession to fight coronavirus
May 13, 2026 2:58 PM

The following translation is an exclusive interview that appeared in the weekend edition of the northern Italian daily La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana, which has fiercely defended Italy’s religious freedom throughout the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. Correspondent Andrea Zambrano interviewed a Roman Catholic parish priest, Rev. Domenico Cirigliano, who was slapped with a €400 fine by local police for processing with a “miraculous” crucifix. Rev. Cirigliano said he was performing essential “work” by blessing the town of Rocca Imperiale in order to save it from the outbreak of the coronavirus.

“The mayor ordered me to observe a 14-day quarantine,” he said after the incident. “But I won’t pay the fine. They want to punish the Church.”

Zambrano writes in his introduction:

The story is unbelievable, but it is nothing more than the natural continuation of the arbitrary limitations that having arisen during the COVID-19 emergency, from a literal application of government decrees which have severely limited [Italy’s] freedom of worship … In Rocca Imperiale, in the province of Cosenza, we have just witnessed the worst of this.

Zambrano notes, “It was precisely in 1691 when the crucifix” that Rev. Cirigliano carried “shed blood. And because of this miraculous wood, the crucifix is processed each March 30 through the main streets of the town.”

Below is the full interview between Zambrano and FRev Cirigilano who leads off by saying, “There is no way I’ll pay that fine.”

Zambrano: Fr. Domenico, what do you mean you won’t pay it?

Cirigliano: I won’t pay for it. Period. I didn’t even sign the police report for this reason.

Zambrano: Why?

Cirigliano: Because it is only a way to punish the Church.

Zambrano: Did you inform your bishop?

Cirigliano: Yes, I did.

Zambrano: So, what did he say?

Cirigliano: That he will call the mayor.

Zambrano: What for?

Cirigliano: Because the mayor notified me of a report prohibiting me from leaving home for 14 days.

Zambrano: Let’s review what happened step by step.

Cirigliano: OK.

Zambrano: So, it all started on March 30 …

Cirigliano: Exactly. Not being able to conduct the annual procession–which we had done without interruption for three straight centuries–I told our parishioners to know that I would pass through the main streets … blessing [them] with the crucifix.

Zambrano: And what did parishioners say?

Cirigliano: The young parishioners helped me spread the word on Whatsapp, and a lot of excitement was created. People were happy. They opened the windows and doors of their homes to watch.

Zambrano: And then what happened?

Cirigliano: At noon on March 30, a boy from the parish telephoned me to report that a “policeman” (an officer whom he called policeman “V”) “said not to go on with the procession.”

Zambrano: Who was officer “V”?

Cirigliano: A local officer. However, I explained that it was not a [public] procession. I was alone. There was only one parishioner with me, [following] at a distance with his mask on. The purposed [of the procession] was to protect our town from the coronavirus. I don’t care [what they say otherwise].

Zambrano: What happened?

Cirigliano: Well, around 5 p.m., I went outside [to process], and I was met by two carabinieri officers, who asked me for my papers.

Zambrano: What did you say?

Cirigliano: I said that my hands were occupied, because I was holding the crucifix. I couldn’t just lay it on the ground. “Take them yourself,” I said. And they rummaged through my pockets.

Zambrano: Then what happened?

Cirigliano: So, I carried on with the procession. People greeted the crucifix from afar. Some people got emotional, others blew kisses and prayed. I was tired, but the experience was moving. All went well, except on my way back …

Zambrano: What happened?

Cirigliano: The carabinieri police officers were still standing in front of my church. They were waiting for me to return my ID card and notify me of the charges they filed.

Zambrano: For 400 euros?

Cirigliano: Yeah, but I won’t pay it. I didn’t even sign their report, which they left on the church table.

Zambrano: What did the report say?

Cirigliano: I will read it to you. “Your movement was not for reasons of work, necessity, or health within the territory of the city of Rocca Imperiale. At 5:25 p.m. today [March 30th] in Rocca Imperiale you were found on Via XX Settembre [right next to the church]. You are charged with violating [quarantine] on public streets for the purposes of holding a demonstration/religious event in a public place. You carried out a procession while holding up a crucifix, and another person took part in it. The procession … continued until 17.55 [5:55 p.m.], throughout all the streets of the historic center of Rocca Imperiale.”

Zambrano: How can this be a violation? Isn’t your sacred ministry considered your work, as defined by the Ministry of the Interior? Don’t you think that this report appears illegitimate?

Cirigliano: What do you want me to say?

Zambrano: And what about other processions [in Italy] then? Isn’t it true … that many priests have gone out into the streets to process with the Blessed Sacrament? In the town of Bibione, a parish priest loaded up a statue of the Madonna [and processed] with the both the mayor’s and local police’s approval. Why wasn’t he apprehended and fined? ….

Cirigliano: Look, I don’t know. Here, everyone interprets the law as he or she wishes. ….

Zambrano: You already said you won’t pay the fine, but will you do something to restore your right to worship?

Cirigliano: For now, let’s accept this as a trial sent by our Lord. Then, let’s see what the bishop will be able to do. Even so, I am very bitter. I processed with the crucifix to bless the whole city, to bless all the inhabitants of Rocca Imperiale, including the carabinieri police and the mayor. It is the crucifix that must protect us. Instead, they make it seem that this was a personal matter. … I do not find this to be fair or respectful of a minister of God.

images courtesy of La Nuova Bussola Quotidiana.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wrap-up Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 13, 2006 – Over the course of the week I have offered my reflections that have arisen within the context of the Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar offered by the Institute for Humane Studies (previous editons: Weekend, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday). The presentations by the faculty have been in great part engaging, intellectually rigorous, and valuable. I’ll conclude with an observation about the necessity for any intellectual endeavor to pursue scholarship in a rigorous and serious way. This...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 5
In Part 4, we saw that post-Enlightenment philosophical currents such as Humean empiricism, utilitarianism, and legal positivism are the real culprits in the demise of natural law and not theological criticism from within Reformation theology, as many today take for granted. If this is so, why is contemporary Protestant theology so critical of natural law? The mon reason why contemporary Protestants reject natural law is because they think it does not take sin seriously enough. And the second, which we...
Government and the Decline of Urban Catholicism
Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett wrote an outstanding piece for USA Today. He argues convincingly that the large-scale and widespread withdrawal of Catholic institutions from many of the nation’s cities has ramifications that extend beyond the interests of Catholics alone. He notes, too, that government has a role to play in facilitating the flourishing of religious institutions such as Catholic churches and hospitals—mainly by honoring a properly understood separation of church and state: Is there anything the government and...
Charity vs. Philanthropy
Philanthropy, for all its good intentions, does not necessarily imply a personal connection with the needy person. It can and often does, but it doesn’t have to. Philanthropy is the more institutional, “big-picture” cousin of charity, which is the personal and direct connection to those in need. Andrew Carnegie building hundreds of libraries with the wealth he made in the steel industry, and being celebrated for it to this day, is philanthropy. Your Aunt Evelyn volunteering at the local church-operated...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 4
In Part 3, we examined why many contemporary Protestants have something of a bad conscience when es to natural law. But, of course, the blame for this cannot be laid fully upon Karl Barth. Even a hint of a fuller explanation has to address intellectual currents that begin to gather momentum in the so-called Enlightenment. One popular explanation within the academic mainstream for the demise of the natural-law tradition in modern Protestant theology attributes it to a form of implosion....
Cyber Communication
Ever since the popularization of the Internet, a debate has raged—within and without Christian circles—about the effect of the medium on human development and relationships. A serious and plausible charge against the Web came from those who thought its mode of munication would alter the form of human interaction for the worse. (See, for example, Quentin Schultze’s Habits of the High-Tech Heart, reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality by Megan Maloney.) As is usually the case with new...
World Cups of Philosophy and Theology
For those of you who are going through World Cup withdrawal after the defeat of the French by the Azzurri have a fort. I give you the World Cups of Philosophy and Theology. ‘Nobby’ Hegel leads the Germans onto the pitch. The first is a two-part video of the Monty Python skit featuring German philosophers against the Greeks (text here). The German side touts Leibniz in goal with strikers Nietzsche and Heidegger. The Greeks have Plato in net, with Aristotle...
How about making it a permanent internship?
Every morning I make a point checking out for unintentionally hilarious news about the workings of the EU bureaucracy. Yesterday there was this article about an internship program with a twist. Instead of ing to Brussels, this one is designed for 350 EU senior officials to spend time with small- and medium-sized businesses in member states. “We don’t need an ivory tower mented Mr Verheugen, suggesting that by acquiring such a “hands-on experience” in SMEs, mission’s administrators will understand their...
Nipsey Russell on Social Security
Nipsey Russell (1918-2005) I was flipping stations tonight and passed the Game Show Network, which was showing reruns of Match Game ’74. Nipsey Russell, the so-called “Poet Laureate of Television,” began the show with this poem for prosperity: To slow down this recession, and make this economy thrive, give us our social security now, we’ll go to work when we’re sixty-five. ...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wednesday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 12, 2006 – Yesterday I outlined in brief a biblical case for the legitimate and even divine institution of civil government. Having established that the State is a valid social institution, the next step in what is broadly called social ethics is to outline the scope of the State’s authority and its relations to other social institutions. A valuable place to start might be in defining what the role of the State ought to be, rather than...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved