According to Founding Father James Madison, “the rights of persons and the rights of property” constituted the “two cardinal objects of government.” And the “most sacred form of property,” according to Madison, was an individual’s conscience since “other property depending in part on positive law, the exercise of that, being a natural and inalienable right . . .”

Both property and conscience (religious freedom) have been considered foundational rights. But what exactly do they have mon? More than we may assume, argues John J. Infranca in a law review article titled “(Communal) Life, (Religious) Liberty, And Property.”

In the abstract of the paper, Infranca states,

Property rights and religious liberty seem to share little mon. Yet surprisingly similar claims have long been made on their behalf, including bold assertions that each of these two rights uniquely limits the power of the state and serves as the foundation for other rights. This Article reframes the conception of property rights and religious liberty as foundational by munitarian aspects of each right. Property and religious freedom are a foundation for other rights, but in a different manner than traditional accounts suggest. It is not the individual exercise of these rights that provides a foundation for other rights, but rather plementary roles these rights play in the formation of munities that, in turn, serve as counterweights to the state.

Read more . . .

(Via: Mirror of Justice)