Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Negotiating with a Domestic Extremist
Negotiating with a Domestic Extremist
Sep 15, 2026 6:43 AM

A new book wants to be a slam-dunk take-down of feminism and hook-up culture. But whatever its good intentions, an overly rosy picture of its “trad” opposite does young women—and men—no favors.

Read More…

Domestic Extremist: A Practical Guide to Winning the Culture War by Peachy Keenan—a pseudonym used by a seriously Catholic humorist deep in the bowels of blue California—is a heated polemic about how feminism has failed women and how they can take back their lives and femininity from a twisted culture. Its tone ranges from relentless rant to poor-taste humor to outrage. Yet I was pleasantly surprised by its serious takes on a variety of ethical issues and their impact on women—from abortion and birth control to egg-freezing, egg donation, and of course, hook-up culture.

We classical liberals struggle to grasp the reality of “network effects”—ways in which our decisions can change the landscape of choice even for those individuals who do not want to make similar decisions. Birth control is like this: while it’s certainly up to you whether to use it, the fact that so many women do has radically shifted the strategic landscape around mating.

Excuse me for the game-theoretic language, but this is an unavoidable fact of our lives now. If most women are not concerned about sex leading to babies, they are far more willing to have sex outside of marriage without the promise of marriage, even should a baby ensue. While I tip my hat to the few men who believe in the virtue of chastity, the cold, hard truth is that the traditional stigma against out-of-wedlock birth kept the majority of men in line in important ways, ways that have now for the most part disappeared.

In the olden days (before 1961 and the Pill), it was pretty tough for a man to find a woman to sleep with him who wouldn’t extract a promise of marriage in advance in case of pregnancy. Nowadays, not so much. This means that a man can have plenty of sex without getting married. But women who save themselves for marriage are up against a world indifferent to the institution, and a majority of men who aren’t interested in it at all. This, in turn, wears down the motivation for, say, a Christian woman to stick to her principles for fear of being alone forever.

Of course, the whole thing is a terrible trick—there have never been more single people in the history of the world, and reports of loneliness have never been higher. But we’re trapped in our own hell of strategic logic, with women of faith facing a depressing set of demographics. There simply are not enough good men to go around.

And this is where Keenan’s hot takes fall short, I’m afraid. While I appreciate her pointing out the advantages of young marriage and young motherhood, the sad fact is that many, many faithful women simply will not find a suitable partner, no matter how hard they try. The book may rescue a few young women from the stupid assumption that marriage and childbearing will be just as easy (or even possible) at 35 as it would have been at 25, and I’m grateful for that. But it’s got precious little to say to those who would have been happy to marry young but now need to forge some kind of life in spite of losing the dream of husband and children.

I’ll be honest and say that giving young women advice has its place, but we’re in much greater need of good advice that can break through to young men. They are just as shattered by the aimlessness and uselessness of the selfish lives they’ve been encouraged to pursue, and if more of them don’t find some way of turning things around, all the feminine modesty and chastity in the world won’t produce a bunch of beautiful families. Part of my disagreement with Keenan here is that she grew up in an irreligious background and drifted into liberalism in college, while I grew up in a deeply religious household and never really strayed from the values I’d been given. That just means that while Peachy wants her college friends to settle down and procreate before it’s too late, I can’t count the number of beautiful, godly women I know who cry themselves to sleep at night longing for marriage and children. To borrow from one of Keenan’s chapter titles, these women have no problem “cultivating a marriage mindset.” They have a problem finding someone to marry.

Despite its sober subject matter, the book is supposed to be funny, yet I didn’t exactly find it to be particularly hilarious (OK, I chuckled here and there). Keenan’s attempts at humor were as likely to induce an “oof” as a laugh. I think of myself as someone with a good sense of humor, and I’m not overly moralistic about it, but even I was a bit shocked by some of her vulgar nonchalance. She refers to the current suicide epidemic as young people “flinging themselves off buildings left and right” and asserts sarcastically that remembering that your favorite porn actors are probably being trafficked is “a real boner-killer.” I don’t mind a bit of dark humor, but something doesn’t sit right with me about the new vulgarity on the right. Am I really supposed to listen to you wax eloquent about traditional values while you gleefully ignore what we used to call mon decency”? Chesterton’s humor was clever, not crude. Conservatives ought to be smarter than that, but oddly they seem to have embraced the old liberal canard that it’s always best to just say es to mind, as a sign of “authenticity.” That’s the danger of slipping into a reactionary mindset. In our decided defiance of the left, we ironically e them, sometimes without even realizing it.

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about moral imagination and the role of Christians in generating genuinely creative solutions to our moral and social ills. I think this is one reason I didn’t enjoy the book as much as I’d hoped. To be fair, Keenan does spend the latter part of the book on alternatives, but it’s a 321-page work, and the entire first half is one plaint against feminism. Each social perspective has its pitfalls, and while conservatives are good at being grateful for the past, they’re bad at pushing into the future. Their natural disposition is one of lament, which can be exhausting. After 168 pages of finger-wagging sarcasm, I found myself, frankly, bored.

I often joke with my students that I’m a “radical first-wave feminist,” which means that I’m pro-marriage (with equal rights to custody of children), pro-life, and pro–women’s voting and property rights. I’ve always been a working mom who was painfully aware of my dependence on the homemakers who had time to go on field trips, run the school fundraisers, and host the spring-break hangouts. But I did choose a profession—and a certain path within that profession—that would protect my family life and give me the flexibility I needed to be a mom.

I’m also a lifelong Christian who followed all of Peachy Keenan’s advice about finding domestic bliss. And while I resonated with many of her snarkily stated, tough-love, anti-feminist (whether second, third, or fourth wave) perspectives, I can’t help but grieve for those of us who followed all the “rules” yet didn’t end up with our promised e. After 10 years of marriage, I underwent an unwanted divorce from the father of my children. So much for “till death us do part” when your partner refuses to do his.

A strange sort of prosperity gospel can sneak its way into the understandable praise for the traditional family: if you do these certain things, you’ll get a great husband and a great life. But life is far plicated for that, and human beings are dysfunctional and unpredictable. Speaking up for many of us church girls who fell for this false gospel, I’ll say, yes, do all the things, and yes, it will improve your chances, but also, life is still difficult and I can’t promise you any particular e, except that Jesus is faithful.

It’s undoubtedly annoying to read a critique of a book for not being a different book than it is, but given the near-ubiquitous critiques of “purity ing out on everything from #WeirdChristianTwitter to Netflix, I expected Keenan to demonstrate some reflection on these matters. The trad-wife trend might be cute for college-educated converts like Keenan who know how to balance adherence to tradition with legitimate autonomy. It stops being cute altogether when you’re 16 and raising your smallest siblings, homeschooled with a curriculum that praises benevolent slave-holders, and soon-to-be married off to the veritable stranger that your father mends.

Does this sound extreme? It is! But it’s all too real in movements like the IBLP, recently exposed by Netflix’s Shiny, Happy People documentary. If you can stand it, listen to Sheila Gregoire’s interview with Alyssa Wakefield, who describes her years of sexual slavery in a marriage set up by her father. While it’s funny to name a book Domestic Extremist, it’s important to explicitly hedge on just how extreme you want to be. Keenan herself is no more extreme than any culturally cosmopolitan but theologically serious Catholic, and yet somehow misses the chance to caution against the extremes to which “traditional domesticity” takes some women.

In the end, I may simply be tiring of the futile culture wars. Build something beautiful or stop talking. And if we’re not policing our own side, plaining to me when the really weird ones go off the deep end and undermine all the credibility in our movement. Kudos to Peachy for finding God and building a family. I hope her book does encourage some young women not to be taken in by the ridiculous lies of the feminist left. But rosy pictures of the perfect traditional life won’t provide meaning and purpose to those left behind by a culture in free fall. The only thing that can do that is God Himself, and the love and service He calls us into, whether our dreams of domestic e true or not.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
PBR: The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) is poised to be signed into law after weeks of wrangling. Since we know that “budgets are moral documents,” then spending and stimulus bills must be as well. So this week’s PowerBlog Ramblings question is: “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Ramble on… Ramblings: Do We Need a New New Deal?Something for NothingDangerous Deficit SpendingGovernmental Accountability and Transparency? ...
An Economic Recovery for the Religious Left
Mark Tooley calls out “emerging church maestro” Brian Mclaren in a piece today in The American Spectator titled “A Real ‘Economic’ Recovery.” I was introduced to Brian McLaren in seminary when new students were required to read his books in introductory classes. Unfortunately, I was one of only a handful not impressed. He also lectured in person to a class I took, but honestly I don’t remember much about the lecture, except conservatives were generally denounced and “big oil” was...
PBR: Dangerous Deficit Spending
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” One of the gravest moral issues related to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is the matter of dangerous deficit spending. Anybody plugged into our nation’s financial crisis is likely aware of the unsustainable spending path of not just the federal government, but individual states as well. Because many states have balanced budget amendments, they are not entitled to run deficits, so...
PBR: Do We Need a New New Deal?
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” Perhaps the most effective historical trope in pushing through the massive stimulus package on Capitol Hill has been the notion that if only the New Deal of the 1930s hadn’t had to wait more than three years for the election of FDR, the Great Depression might have been avoided. But have you ever wondered why the Great Depression persisted for so long?...
PBR: Something for Nothing
In response to the question, “What are the moral lessons of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)?” The ARRA makes clear that we have not learned one great moral lesson: You can’t have something for nothing. Or, among economists, there’s no such thing as a free lunch. I’m not even sure that anybody is seriously arguing that most of the items contained in this bill constitute “stimulus.” Congress can genuinely stimulate the economy in two ways: decreasing taxes and...
PBR: A Mainline Bailout
In response to the question, “What is the future of the faith-based initiative?” Under the Obama administration, the faith-based initiative will increasingly e a means to bailout flagging mainline and liberal denominations and ministries, who will have no problem modating their religious practices to secular standards. And in this we will see even clearer manifestation of the theocratic hopes of the religious left. ...
More on Historical Hoosier Eugenics
A little more than a year ago, I wrote a really nice piece on this topic— on the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the nation’s first eugenics law (in Indiana). Now, more historical context from Jesse Walker at Reason… In 1888, a social reformer named Oscar McCulloch delivered a speech in Buffalo titled “The Tribe of Ishmael: A Study in Social Degradation.” Indianapolis, McCulloch declared, had been infected by a “pauper ganglion,” a depraved clan that survived “by stealing,...
An Alternative Stimulus
Washington is all atwitter about the “Stimulus,” which is currently being pushed through Congress (without being read by most members). Acton’s own Michelle Muccio e up with a plan of her own, and did a bit of independent research to see if her proposal would find any support: ...
Divorcing Marriage
A staggering piece by Stephen Baskerville in Touchstone… I’ve written at length that marriage has been damaged much moreso by divorce than by calls for (or movements toward) “same-sex” marriage. Baskerville expands on that and discusses the initial “grand experiment” on marriage– the policies behind the move toward easier divorce. G. K. Chesterton once observed that the family serves as the principal check on government power, and he suggested that someday the family and the state would confront one another....
Acton Commentary: The Abracadabra Stimulus Plan
In this week’s Acton Commentary, Anthony Bradley exposes the “legislative incantations” designed to artificially create consumer demand (where none exists) via the stimulus bill. “Real needs must be permitted to create real demand, and thus truly sustainable jobs,” he writes. Read mentary at the Acton Institute website and share your feedback here. ...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved