Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Macron’s speech offers thin gruel on Western ‘values’
Macron’s speech offers thin gruel on Western ‘values’
Dec 17, 2025 9:31 PM

For one fleeting moment in Emmanuel Macron’s speech to Congress, it seemed as though he would connect the transatlantic alliance on the firm basis of mon values.

“The strength of our bonds is the source of our shared ideals,” he told lawmakers. Since 1776, the United States and France “have worked together for the universal ideals of liberty, tolerance, and equal rights.”

The use of the phrase “universal values,” an ersatz substitute for Western values, preceded his assessment of the key challenges confronting the U.S. and France:

“Together with our international allies and partners, we are facing inequalities created by globalization; threats to the planet, mon good; attacks on democracies through the rise of illiberalism; and the destabilization of our munity by new powers and criminal states.”

These purported crises demand collective (and collectivist) action on at least three notable areas, based on these aforementioned “universal values.”

Censoring “Fake News.” Macron couched government action to suppress certain media narratives as democracy’s self-defense mechanism. “To protect our democracies, we have to fight against the ever-growing virus of fake news, which exposes our people to irrational fear and imaginary risks,” Macron told Congress. “Without reason, without truth, there is no real democracy,” he continued. “The corruption of information is an attempt to corrode the very spirit of our democracies.” Macron has proposed giving judges the power to block stories they deem “fake news,” delete links to them, and close their users’ accounts.

Censorship contravenes America’s most fundamental founding ideals. Thomas Jefferson, whom Macron praised during his speech, wrote that he opposed all efforts “to silence by force & not by reason” the plaints or criticisms” of the press – whether the stories in question were “just or unjust.” Jefferson’s day saw more fake news than our own; however, he relished waging ideological battle in the certainty that truth would prevail. “Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost,” he added.

Rejoining the Paris climate agreement. “In order to make our planet great again,” Macron said in a playful twist on President Trump’s signature phrase, “I am sure one day the United States e back and join the Paris [climate] agreement.” While acknowledging concerns that the pact would harm the economy, he insisted, “We must find a smooth transition to a low-carbon economy.”

Europe’s experience should provide a warning against an ambitious, government-driven green energy agenda. Germany’s modest attempts to meet its energy needs with alternative energy sources have subjected whole regions to the threat of blackouts and caused energy costs to skyrocket. UK fuel regulations have forcibly separated some families for days at a time. These manifestly harm the middle class, whom Macron recognized as “the backbone of our democracies.”

Greater economic regulation. “I believe in the power of intelligently regulated market economies,” he said. Reducing the “inequalities created by globalization … requires the opposite of massive deregulation and extreme nationalism.” France offers little evidence that increased regulation creates prosperity, nor that regulation is often intelligent. After all, the recession of yesterday was produced by the regulations of two days ago.

More to the point, economic inequality – which is a misleading measure – has been declining, not increasing, according to the IEA’s Ryan Bourne. While the wealthy have gotten wealthier as globalization proceeds, the poor have gotten richer even faster. Oxfam admits that extreme global poverty has “halved” between 1990 and 2010 – a process that came, not from regulation and redistribution, but investment and private-sector development.

Absent from Macron’s list are such paramount Western values as religious liberty – e.g., allowing schoolchildren to wear a crucifix – respecting life, and allowing people to thrive apart from the continual interference of government in their choice of media consumption or their financial affairs.

As a source of shared Western values, this was thin gruel indeed.

CC BY 4.0.)

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The problem with aid
In a number of previous posts, I have expressed concern over new efforts to increase the amount of government-to-government aid to Africa (see here, here, and here for background). Today brings another bit of news that should give pause to anyone advocating for massive increases in government aid to Africa. From Saturday’s London (UK) Telegraph : The scale of the task facing Tony Blair in his drive to help Africa was laid bare yesterday when it emerged that Nigeria’s past...
Sacred/secular strife in the public square
The battle over public displays of the 10 Commandments indicates to me just how much ground Christians have given up in recent years. Radical secularists have attacked any and all public expressions of Christian faith, most often by means of the “T” word (theocracy) and appeals to the “wall of separation.” What Samuel Gregg calls “doctrinaire secularism” is winning. It has gotten to the point that identifiably or uniquely Christian expressions have been all but expunged from, or at best...
Miracles before our eyes
The case is open. Today marks the first day the canonization of John Paul II is officially underway. (Read BBC’s account.) To those for whom the procedures of the Catholic Church in matters such as these seem alien, I point to the lucid explanation of the Reverend Giuseppe D’Alonzo (the man in charge of verifying the claims of John Paul’s miracles): Asked what he thought about making John Paul II a saint, the Rev D’Alonzo replied that it was not...
How religious right, left can work together
The Detroit News included a statement from me, along with two of their Faith and Policy columnists, reacting to a Washington Post story by Alan Cooperman about cooperation between religious leaders from the political left and right. Here’s my bit: The Washington Post’s article about the prospects for rapprochement between religious conservatives and liberals gets to the heart of the “cold war” that has existed between these groups for so long. The historic intractability of both sides has led to...
No ‘Magic Number’ on foreign aid
USAID Administrator Andrew Natsios set the record straight at a U.N. conference when he told the gathering that the United States has “no intention” mitting to a goal for foreign aid pegged to a percentage of gross domestic product. Some countries are pressing for the U.S. mit to an official development assistance (ODA) goal of 0.7 percent of GDP, a figure that would oblige the United States to spend more than $90 billion annually. The Washington Times reported that Natsios...
Take your ball and go home
“Winning isn’t everything.” Whatever happened to this slice of wisdom? In Columbus, Ohio, a team of baseball players has been ejected from their league for being “too good”! (Read the story here). The parents of the teams being slaughtered by the better plained that losing was seriously detrimental to their kids’ self-esteem. Therefore, the league decided to reward the hard work of the winning team with expulsion. Winning isn’t everything, but apparently, losing is. What this league and the supporting...
Ruling on the Decalogue
I have to admit that I’ve never been able to get that fired up about the controversies surrounding the various public displays of the Decalogue. It no doubt has to do with my view that it is far more important for the law to be written on our hearts rather than on stone (see for example Jeremiah 31:27-40). It’s all (on both sides) struck me as a little to much like public posturing, and for the Christian conservatives who support...
Reagan voted greatest American
Ronald Reagan was voted the Greatest American in history by a slim margin by a Discovery Channel program, barely beating out Abraham Lincoln. Martin Luther King, Jr., George Washington, and Benjamin Franklin rounded out the top 5. Of course, I’m not sure how much credence should be lent to a list whose top 100 included such luminaries as Tom Cruise, Ellen DeGeneres, Brett Favre, Dr. Phil, and Michael Moore. In any case, when Ronald Reagan passed away last year, Acton...
Journal of Markets & Morality, volume 8, issue 1
Journal of Markets & Morality Volume 8 • Number 1 The publication of this issue (vol. 8, no. 1) marks the full implementation of the journal’s two issue moving wall. This means that as an archived issue, volume 7, number 1 is now freely available in its entirety. Subscribers are able to access electronically the full content of the two most current issues. Stephen Grabill’s editorial deals with these trends in scholarly publishing, with an eye on the specific situation...
Sue the competition
AMD is suing Intel, claiming “freedom of choice and the benefits of innovation…are being stolen away in the microprocessor market,” says Hector Ruiz, AMD chairman, president and chief executive. This case raises concerns over at Fast Company Now, as Kevin Ohannessian writes, I worry that this could start a new trend. Is petitor trouncing you? Sue him. Do you feel your product is underperforming due to unfair opposition? Take your rival to court. It does seem at times that America...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2025 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved