Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Humanity 2.0: The human progress accelerator that ‘should’
Humanity 2.0: The human progress accelerator that ‘should’
Apr 1, 2026 9:59 PM

Matthew Sanders and Fr. Ezra Sullivan, O.P. facilitate moral discussion with entrepreneurs and academics.

Matthew Harvey Sanders, a former seminarian turned successful technology munications entrepreneur, has sought to fuse deep theological and moral convictions with his natural talent and contagious pioneering spirit. His brain child: Humanity 2.0, a self-described “human progress accelerator” showcased last May 9 at a forum held inside Vatican walls.

According to Sanders’s web site, Humanity 2.0 is built on Thomas Aquinas’s precepts for human salvation, namely, that we ought to believe, desire and mit to what our Christian mands us to do. The project’s specific mission is to “identify impediments to human progress and work collaboratively across [multiple] sectors to remove them by sourcing and scaling bold and innovative solutions.”

Sanders began his ambitious project over one year ago, but last Friday’s meeting was its international launch. Humanity 2.0 attracted the creativity and moral conscience of business executives, entrepreneurs and academics in order to give them space to pitch solutions to global social health, economic, and moral concerns. Listening and critiquing them were religious leaders, public sector officials, journalists and think tank representatives.

No doubt Sanders worked hardto realize a coup of business, academic, ecclesial and public sector leadership all under one Vatican roof. It was a feat not easily achieved while at the same time balancing harmonious agreement and vigorous disagreement from among the over 150 creative and concerned minds. Nevertheless, Sanders remained positive and expressed his confidence that human beings can unite under the umbrella of effective care and solidarity when left free to do what they “should” and “can” creatively achieve.

“If history has taught us anything, it’s that humans rarely rise to the occasion unless they’re inspired by what ‘should be’ and this is why Humanity 2.0 mitted to articulating mon vision”, Sanders said. “The crux of our strategy is to focus on what we ‘can’ do together, not what we ‘can’t’.”

The entire morning of the forum was dedicated to the “Humanity 2.0 Lab”, a vision for research centers to be set up in cities with mercial, cultural and moral influence, including Rome where the pope is considered to have the greatest ‘soft power’. The Humanity 2.0 Lab would gather and share data on scientific, economic and health-related issues in order to coalesce the brightest minds to cooperate on providing optimal solutions to shared human crises.

The CEO of the Humanity 2.0 Lab, Morad Fareed, presented his plan for centers focusing on maternal health impact. Fareed is the founder Square Roots, “a pany” that focuses on improving pregnancy health “by connecting the dots of existing care models to human needs.” He also co-founded Delos, a global wellness enterprise guided by the mission to serve as the world’s leading catalyst for enhanced health and well-being in the environments where we live, work, sleep and play.

His maternal health labs would work to amalgamate and analyze data and then offer tool-kits of preventative medicine and self-care for carrying babies to full term. Fareed said that optimizing pregnancy is critical to ensuring human flourishing and that if we don’t act, we are limiting the potential of the next generation.

The forum’s afternoon mainly focused on the moral vision and ethical debate surrounding human flourishing and decision making in business. Fr. Ezra Sullivan, OP, a Dominican theologian at the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas, evaluated the various levels of human happiness, while clearly stating that without some basic level of health and well-being, as defined by Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, flourishing is simply not possible.

Sullivan also demonstrated how there may arise confusing and conflicting “metrics of happiness”, as when European Nordic countries are said to be the “most happy” but also have the “highest suicide rates,” a correlation many do not naturally expect. Hence, even while material needs are being met by a supposedly well-organized societies, they are not the only measure of human fulfillment. Most fundamentally, said Sullivan, the needs of our intellectual and spiritual dimensions must also be cared for and respected by the munity.

After Sullivan’s speech, a School of Business Ethics supported by the Pontifical Lateran University as well as professors from Harvard and Wharton business schools was proposed by Fr. Philip Larrey. Larry is the Lateran’s professor of logic, author of Connected World, and chairman of Humanity 2.0.

Larrey said while we live in a corporate world guided by good governance, tightly enforced pliance and superior codes of conduct, we too often breach solid moral infrastructure in place at successful businesses. The problem is not just that the human species is fallen to original sin and thus prone to evil.

“Most business persons I meet are actually very impressive moral persons” yet need better judgement and moral mentoring to sort through dilemmas brought on by the plex transactions” they must discern in market exchange economies, Larrey said.

Larrey said his vision for a School of Business in Rome would provide diplomas and certificates via intensive seminars with executives and entrepreneurs to “raise their level of critical thinking” without producing cookie cutter or Vatican imprimatur solutions to business ethics and by ing much more international case studies in collaboration with the world’s best business schools.

The closing session was dedicated to emerging technology for mon good. Sanders reminded the audience that Humanity “2.0” implies that the human species has moved beyond its primitive “1.0” version, when human society used to be made of rival and ultimately disconnected munities.

“Today’s “2.0” humanity,” Sanders said, is made of munities, essentially “one tribe which should be able to municate and collaborate with the aid of modern technologies and act in coordinated, creative solidarity” for the achievement of goods necessary for human flourishing.

This is exactly what Pope Francis has called for, as noted in an excellent Crux article on the event, when he urged faithful last November 2018 to strive for “free and far-sighted entrepreneurship… and a solidarity approach” for achieving just solutions to humanity’s greatest present-day and future challenges.

(Photo and featured image credit: Humanity 2.0 logo used with permission from Matthew Harvey Sanders. Top photo courtesy of Michael Severance).

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Audio: Dr. Carl Trueman on Christians and Politics
If you weren’t able to make it to Derby Station on Wednesday for our latest Acton On Tap event, have no fear: we’re pleased to present the full recording of the evening’s festivities featuring Dr. Carl Trueman of Westminister Seminary via the audio player below. If you’re unfamiliar with Dr. Trueman or his work, check out Jordan Ballor’s introduction right here. Considering that the PowerBlog’s focus over the past few days has been on how Christians are approaching the debt...
A Response to ‘What Would Jesus Cut?’
Jim Wallis and a number of other Christians involved in politics are trying to gain attention for the question, “What would Jesus cut?” The answer to this question is supposed to be as obvious as it is in other moral contexts. For example, would Jesus lie about the useful life of a refrigerator he was selling for Best Buy? No way. Would he bully a kid into giving away his lunch money? Not a chance. Would you find him taking...
Jesus as Budget Director?
My first reaction to “What Would Jesus Cut?” is that it tends to reduce Christ to a distributor of material goods through government programs. Jesus is not a budget overseer or a dispenser of government largesse. Sojourners founder Jim Wallis has already countered this accusation with his own post saying, “We haven’t been trying to get Jesus to be the head of any mittee, or think that he would ever want that job!” But still, to use Christ as an...
Archbishop Chaput: The American experience and global religious liberty
A brilliant assessment of where we are. (HT: American Orthodox Institute Observer). Subject to the governor of the universe: The American experience and global religious liberty March 1, 2011 – Most Rev. Charles J. Chaput, O.F.M. Cap., Archbishop of Denver, addressed the Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs at Georgetown University. A friend once said – I think shrewdly — that if people want to understand the United States, they need to read two documents. Neither one is...
Chilean Model of Integral Development Visits the Vatican
The President of Chile, Sebastián Piñera, visited Pope Benedict XVI in the Vatican yesterday, and the Vatican’s daily newspaper L’Osservatore Romano carried a front-page article by Piñera on “Economic Development and Integral Development,” a theme of great interest to us at Acton and the subject of our current conference series Poverty, Entrepreneurship and Integral Development. Chile is justly famous for its acceptance of free-market economics through the influence of the “Chicago Boys” who studied under Milton Friedman and others at...
Opposing Views: America’s Debt Crisis and ‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’
Last week’s issuance of “A Call for Intergenerational Justice: A Christian Proposal on the American Debt Crisis” has occasioned a good bit of discussion on the topic, both here at the PowerBlog and around various other blogs and social media sites. It has been interesting to see the reaction that ments about the Call have generated. Many have said that I simply misunderstood or misread the document. I have taken the time to reread the document and do some reassessment...
Call of the Entrepreneur Website Redesigned
Now is a great time to check out Acton’s first documentary, The Call of the Entrepreneur. Call of the Entrepreneur's new design. The website has pletely redesigned to be more user friendly and attractive. You will find links to social media forCall of the Entrepreneur as well as options to share the documentary with your friends at the bottom of the site. We’ve also added the high definition trailer to the site. The only trailer available on the previous website...
Intergenerational Injustice and a Question on Taxation
Jordan Ballor has already done a fine job menting on A Call for Intergenerational Justice, and I’m sure that others will be chiming in on the PowerBlog as well. I’d like to focus on a couple of points that stand out to me from an initial reading of the document. I suppose it says something about a document when you can’t finish reading the title without alarm bells going off. “Intergenerational Justice” is a fine sounding term, but what does...
More Thoughts on ‘A Call for Intergenerational Justice’
I posted some initial thoughts on “A Call for Intergenerational Justice: A Christian Proposal on the American Debt Crisis,” which was released by the Center for Public Justice and Evangelicals for Social Action yesterday. I’ve been engaged in what I think are largely helpful conversations on this document in a number of venues in the meantime. Gideon Strauss challenged me to look at the document again, and reconsider my criticisms, and I have been happy to do so. For instance,...
Taking His Name in Vain: What Would Jesus Cut?
Ray’s post pointed to something that’s been bugging me about Jim Wallis’ “What Would Jesus Cut?” campaign. As with the “What Would Jesus Drive?” campaign (“Transportation is a moral issue.” What isn’t these days?), Wallis’ campaign assumes the moral high ground by appropriating the Holy Name of Jesus Christ to advance his highly politicized, partisan advocacy. Jesus es an advertising slogan. And what is implicit here is that those who oppose Wallis are somehow at odds with the Gospel of...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved