Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Group behind annual Hong Kong pro-democracy commemoration under investigation
Group behind annual Hong Kong pro-democracy commemoration under investigation
May 13, 2026 2:53 PM

China’s National Security Law was implemented in June 2020, and bans what the CCP deems as secession, subversion, or terrorism. More than 100 activists have been arrested, countless others have fled, civil and/or political groups have disbanded, and businesses have been forced to shut down because of this policy.

Read More…

The Chinese Communist Party, or CCP, tightened its grip on public dissent Aug. 25 when party leadership announced its investigation into a leading pro-democracy group in Hong Kong.

The Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China is a notable supporter of democracy and is the organizer of the annual rally memorates protesters who died during the Tiananmen Square Massacre.

The Tiananmen Square Massacre occurred on June 4, 1989, when Chinese troops fired at student protestors who were attempting to block the Chinese military’s advance into Tiananmen Square, resulting in an estimated death toll of several thousand. Every year since the 1990s, groups have gathered on June 4 to remember those who were killed. Longtime Acton friend and pro-democracy activist, Jimmy Lai, was alongside those student protesters when the massacre occurred. He was also a regular attendee of the June 4 rallies.

Hong Kong authorities sent a letter to the alliance requesting information due by Sept. 7 on its membership, finances, and activities, according to Reuters. Reuters also reported that several other like-minded associations and individuals were sent similar letters.

Police did not ment on the investigations.

In the letters, Hong Kong police called the alliance “an agent of foreign forces.” The group was also notified that should they fail to submit the information requested of them by the deadline, members could face HK$100,000 in fines and six months in jail.

The es after increasing pressure on the alliance to adhere to strict regulations set under the CCP’s National Security Law, or NSL. This past July, the alliance said it had laid off its staff members to ensure their safety and that half of mittee members had voluntarily stepped down.

Leaders of the alliance, Albert Ho and Lee Cheuk-yan, have already been jailed over their roles in anti-government protests in 2019, along with Jimmy Lai.

Almost two weeks ago, the Civil Human Rights Front, or CHRF, the group that organizes a different rally on July 1 that marks the day Hong Kong’s handover from British to Chinese rule, disbanded amid increasing pressure under the NSL.

It was on this “Handover Day” in 1997, when Hong Kong was reunified with the People’s Republic of China – the state adopted a “one country, two systems” policy to ensure Hong Kong remained economically autonomous and to protect citizens’ freedoms of speech and assembly.

Today, Hong Kong’s enforcement of strict regulations of the Beijing-imposed NSL on its citizens, in which they arrest or censor any hint of dissent, proves that Hong Kong is moving further and further away from “two systems.”

China’s NSL was implemented in June 2020, and bans what the CCP deems as secession, subversion, or terrorism. More than 100 activists have been arrested, countless others have fled, civil and/or political groups have disbanded, and businesses have been forced to shut down because of this policy.

But Hong Kong and the reigning CCP continue to reject any claims of the NSL restricting citizen’s freedoms.

On the day after the NSL was passed, Chief Executive of Hong Kong Carrie Lam lauded it, saying “the legislation will not undermine ‘one country, two systems’ and Hong Kong’s high degree of autonomy” at a press conference.

The June 4 rally was banned this year, with police citing its violation of coronavirus policy. Thousands of police were deployed to prevent people from gathering.

The CCP’s censorship of any public display in memorialization allows the destruction of the memory of the massacre itself more attainable. The unrelenting restrictions imposed under the NSL means the CCP will stop at nothing to eliminate any opposing speech, assembly, or thought against their regime.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wrap-up Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 13, 2006 – Over the course of the week I have offered my reflections that have arisen within the context of the Advanced Studies in Freedom seminar offered by the Institute for Humane Studies (previous editons: Weekend, Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday). The presentations by the faculty have been in great part engaging, intellectually rigorous, and valuable. I’ll conclude with an observation about the necessity for any intellectual endeavor to pursue scholarship in a rigorous and serious way. This...
World Cups of Philosophy and Theology
For those of you who are going through World Cup withdrawal after the defeat of the French by the Azzurri have a fort. I give you the World Cups of Philosophy and Theology. ‘Nobby’ Hegel leads the Germans onto the pitch. The first is a two-part video of the Monty Python skit featuring German philosophers against the Greeks (text here). The German side touts Leibniz in goal with strikers Nietzsche and Heidegger. The Greeks have Plato in net, with Aristotle...
Nipsey Russell on Social Security
Nipsey Russell (1918-2005) I was flipping stations tonight and passed the Game Show Network, which was showing reruns of Match Game ’74. Nipsey Russell, the so-called “Poet Laureate of Television,” began the show with this poem for prosperity: To slow down this recession, and make this economy thrive, give us our social security now, we’ll go to work when we’re sixty-five. ...
How about making it a permanent internship?
Every morning I make a point checking out for unintentionally hilarious news about the workings of the EU bureaucracy. Yesterday there was this article about an internship program with a twist. Instead of ing to Brussels, this one is designed for 350 EU senior officials to spend time with small- and medium-sized businesses in member states. “We don’t need an ivory tower mented Mr Verheugen, suggesting that by acquiring such a “hands-on experience” in SMEs, mission’s administrators will understand their...
Cyber Communication
Ever since the popularization of the Internet, a debate has raged—within and without Christian circles—about the effect of the medium on human development and relationships. A serious and plausible charge against the Web came from those who thought its mode of munication would alter the form of human interaction for the worse. (See, for example, Quentin Schultze’s Habits of the High-Tech Heart, reviewed in the Journal of Markets & Morality by Megan Maloney.) As is usually the case with new...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 5
In Part 4, we saw that post-Enlightenment philosophical currents such as Humean empiricism, utilitarianism, and legal positivism are the real culprits in the demise of natural law and not theological criticism from within Reformation theology, as many today take for granted. If this is so, why is contemporary Protestant theology so critical of natural law? The mon reason why contemporary Protestants reject natural law is because they think it does not take sin seriously enough. And the second, which we...
Government and the Decline of Urban Catholicism
Notre Dame law professor Richard Garnett wrote an outstanding piece for USA Today. He argues convincingly that the large-scale and widespread withdrawal of Catholic institutions from many of the nation’s cities has ramifications that extend beyond the interests of Catholics alone. He notes, too, that government has a role to play in facilitating the flourishing of religious institutions such as Catholic churches and hospitals—mainly by honoring a properly understood separation of church and state: Is there anything the government and...
Charity vs. Philanthropy
Philanthropy, for all its good intentions, does not necessarily imply a personal connection with the needy person. It can and often does, but it doesn’t have to. Philanthropy is the more institutional, “big-picture” cousin of charity, which is the personal and direct connection to those in need. Andrew Carnegie building hundreds of libraries with the wealth he made in the steel industry, and being celebrated for it to this day, is philanthropy. Your Aunt Evelyn volunteering at the local church-operated...
Advanced Studies in Freedom Wednesday Edition
BRYN MAWR, July 12, 2006 – Yesterday I outlined in brief a biblical case for the legitimate and even divine institution of civil government. Having established that the State is a valid social institution, the next step in what is broadly called social ethics is to outline the scope of the State’s authority and its relations to other social institutions. A valuable place to start might be in defining what the role of the State ought to be, rather than...
Protestants and Natural Law, Part 4
In Part 3, we examined why many contemporary Protestants have something of a bad conscience when es to natural law. But, of course, the blame for this cannot be laid fully upon Karl Barth. Even a hint of a fuller explanation has to address intellectual currents that begin to gather momentum in the so-called Enlightenment. One popular explanation within the academic mainstream for the demise of the natural-law tradition in modern Protestant theology attributes it to a form of implosion....
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved