Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about Trump’s tax reform framework
Explainer: What you should know about Trump’s tax reform framework
Oct 22, 2026 2:13 PM

Later today in a speech in Indiana, President Trump will outline his tax reform framework. Here’s what you should know about the president’s plan:

What are the goals of the tax reform framework?

Trump’s tax plan has four stated goals:

1. Make the tax code simple, fair and easy to understand.

2. Give American workers a pay raise by allowing them to keep more of their hard-earned paychecks.

3. Make America the jobs magnet of the world by leveling the playing field for American businesses and workers.

4. Bring back trillions of dollars that are currently kept offshore to reinvest in the American economy.

How does the plan affect individual taxpayers?

The framework proposes the following changes:

• The standard deduction would increase from $6,300 to $12,000 for single filers and from $12,600 to $24,000 for married couples.The additional standard deduction and personal exemptions for the taxpayer and spouse are consolidated into this larger standard deduction.

• Creates a larger “zero tax bracket” by eliminating taxes on the first $24,000 of e earned by a married couple and $12,000 earned by a single individual.

• Reduces the 7 tax brackets (10, 15, 25, 28, 33, 35, and 39.6 percent) to 3 tax brackets of 12 percent, 25 percent, and 35 percent. (An additional top rate may apply to the e taxpayers to ensure that the reformed tax code is at least as progressive as the existing tax code.)

• Increases the Child Tax Credit and make the first $1,000 of the credit refundable.

• Provides a non-refundable credit of $500 for non-child dependents to help defray the cost of caring for other dependents.

• Repeals the existing individual Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).

• Eliminates most itemized deductions (such as deductions for state and local taxes), but retains tax incentives for home mortgage interest and charitable contributions.

• Promises to retain “tax benefits that encourage work, higher education and retirement security.”

• Promises to repeal many exemptions, deductions and credits to “make the system simpler and fairer for all families and individuals, and allow for lower tax rates.”

• Repeals the “death tax”, the federal estate tax applies to the transfer of property at death, that applies to estates worth $5,490,000 or more.

How does the plan affect individual businesses?

The framework proposes the following changes:

• Limits the maximum tax rate applied to the business e of small and family-owned businesses conducted as sole proprietorships, partnerships and S corporations to 25 percent.

• Reduces the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent.

• Eliminates the existing corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT).

• Allows businesses to immediately write off (or “expense”) the cost of new investments in depreciable assets other than structures made after September 27, 2017, for at least five years.

• The deduction for net interest expense incurred by C corporations will be partially limited.

• Preserves business credits for research and development (R&D) and e housing.

• Promises to “modernize” the rules for the special tax regimes the currently exist to govern the tax treatment of certain industries and sectors.

• In an effort to bring overseas corporate profits back into the U.S., all overseas assets from panies will be considered repatriated and taxed at a one-time lower rate. (The rate will be specified at a later date.)

How does this plan differ from the proposal outlined by President Trump during the campaign?

The new plan includes five items that Trumppromised on the campaign trail: reducing the tax brackets, increasing the standard deduction, reducing business tax (though he promised a reduction to 15 percent), and eliminating the AMT and estate tax.

However, Trump’s campaign plan promised to be “revenue neutral” (i.e., would not increase the deficit), a claim which few economists outside of the White House believes is possible.

What happens next?

The president’s framework will now go to the mittees with jurisdiction over tax legislation (the Senate Finance Committee and the House Ways and Means Committee) to be turned into workable bill. Then Congressional Republicans will attempt to pass the tax reform bill via the budget reconciliation process.

By using budget reconciliation, the GOP can limit the number of debates and amendments on the bill and it can be passed with a simple majority of 51 votes.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
Today’s Word from Solzhenitsyn
From the new Solzhenitsyn Reader, which I highly mend (especially if you are behind on your Christmas shopping): Human society cannot be exempted from the laws and demands which constitute the aim and meaning of individual human lives. But even without a religious foundation, this sort of transference is readily and naturally made. It is very human to apply even to the biggest social events or human organizations, including whole states and the United Nations, our spiritual values: noble, base,...
Would You Change the Sign?
Seth Godin wants to know. ...
Hasta La Vista, Siesta
In this week’s Acton Commentary, Anthony Bradley takes a look at the Spanish economy as it faces a “dilemma,” as he puts it, “simultaneously needing immigrants and seeking to curb them.” Bradley also notes that “institutions like marriage and family seem silly to many Spaniards.” As APM’s Marketplace reports, shifting trends in Spain might claim another Spanish institution, the siesta. A variety of factors, including petition with labor forces in other nations, are leading some to question the viability of...
Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics
Stephen Grabill delivers his address at today’s Lord Acton Lecture Series Event Stephen J. Grabill, Acton’s Research Scholar in Theology, delivered an address today based upon his new book which explores plex and often-overlooked relationship between Protestantism and natural law. In Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics, Grabill calls upon Christian ethicists, theologians, and laypersons to take another look at this vital element in the history of Christian ethical thought. He appeals to Reformation and post-Reformation era theologians...
Christian Ecology vs Dominionism
In December of last year I had a great back and forth on the topic of Christian dominionism with fellow green blogger Elsa at Greener Side. A friend wrote recently asking about those posts and my take on dominionism specifically. After letting him know we were safely in the anti-dominionism camp, I said I thought there were more folks in progressive/secular circles that saw Christians as dominionists than Christians who actually bought into this trash. I liked his response: It...
Creepy Libertarianism, Creepy Statism
Rick Ritchie responds to this New Atlantis article by Peter Lawler, “Is the Body Property?” in a recent post on Daylight. Lawler discusses the increasingly broad push modify the human body, especially in the context of organ sales. Lawler writes of “the creeping libertarianism that characterizes our society as a whole. As we understand ourselves with ever greater consistency as free individuals and nothing more, it es less clear why an individual’s kidneys aren’t his property to dispose of as...
Christianity is Big Business in America
“Christian consumption has gone far beyond the book as millions use their buying power to reinforce their faith and mitment to the munity,” reads an article in the current edition of USAToday (HT: Zondervan>To the Point) According to the piece, “Nearly 12% of Americans spend more than $50 a month on religious products, and another 11% spend $25 to $29, according to a national survey of 1,721 adults by Baylor University, out in September.” There has been a great deal...
Marriage and the Black Family
I recently received a letter from a reader of my Acton Commentary column, "Marriage as a Social Justice Issue," which she had seen reprinted in modified form at Town Hall. My correspondent was concerned that I had overlooked a key fact: the lack of marriageable black men. She said, in part: Education and the lower number of available black men are 2 major things you left out of your article. I know that marriage is important in the munity, but...
Politicians and Pigskin
Geoffrey Norman at NRO offers a delightfully sarcastic discussion of the move by a couple of Michigan state senators to use the BCS title game controversy as an opportunity for political grandstanding. “Keep your hands off our football,” is Norman’s message to government. In point of fact, however, there is a long history of government intervention in American sports. An early and famous example is the Supreme Court’s 1922 decision granting Major League Baseball an exemption from antitrust laws. The...
‘Reforming Natural Law’
The January 2007 issue of First Things features a lengthy review of Stephen Grabill’s new book on Protestant natural law thinking (no link to the review, unfortunately). J. Daryl Charles, an assistant professor at Union University, has this to say about Grabill’s Rediscovering the Natural Law in Reformed Theological Ethics (Eerdmans, 2006): Grabill’s examination of theological ethics in the Protestant Reformed mainstream is pelling, and it represents a shot across the bow of theological ethics, as it were. Protestants for...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved