Home
/
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
/
Explainer: What you should know about single-payer healthcare
Explainer: What you should know about single-payer healthcare
Aug 2, 2026 4:51 AM

Today, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is unveiling his legislation for a single-payer healthcare system. Here is what you should know about single-payer systems and Sanders’s proposal:

What is single-payer healthcare?

In a single-payer healthcare system, the government pays for all medically necessary service for of all citizens, regardless of e or ability to pay.

Does the U.S. have a single-payer system?

In the U.S. most citizens over the age of 65 and people under 65 who have specific disabilities qualify for the single-payer system know as Medicare. The expansion of this single-payer system to all citizens is sometimes referred to as “Medicare for all.”

The state of Vermont also attempted to create a single-payer system but scrapped the idea in 2014. As Sarah Kliff explains, “budget analysts realized Vermont would need an additional $2.5 billion in tax revenue to pay for the system. That would have required raising the payroll tax by 11.5 percent and e tax by 9 percent.”

Isn’t the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) a single-payer system?

No. Obamacare is an expansion of government requirements to cover previously uninsured people. Obamacare does not collect money that is paid directly to medical providers but instead relies on currently existing private panies.

What is Sander’s single-payer proposal?

Sen. Sanders has introduced the “Expanded & Improved Medicare For All Act.” The purpose of the legislation is “To provide prehensive health insurance coverage for all United States residents, improved health care delivery, and for other purposes.”

Currently, Sanders has 15 Senate Democrats as co-sponsors for the bill.

What benefits would be covered under Sanders’s single-payer plan?

Everyone living in the U.S. would receive by mail a Medicare For All Program Cardafter filling out a 2-page registration form. All medically necessary services would be covered, including at least the following:

(1) Primary care and prevention.

(2) Approved dietary and nutritional therapies.

(3) Inpatient care.

(4) Outpatient care.

(5) Emergency care.

(6) Prescription drugs.

(7) Durable medical equipment.

(8) Long-term care.

(9) Palliative care.

(10) Mental health services.

(11) The full scope of dental services, services, including periodontics, oral surgery, and endodontics, but not including cosmetic dentistry.

(12) Substance abuse treatment services.

(13) Chiropractic services, not including electrical stimulation.

(14) Basic vision care and vision correction (other than laser vision correction for cosmetic purposes).

(15) Hearing services, including coverage of hearing aids.

(16) Podiatric care.

How would the law determine what medical practices qualified and what prices would be paid?

According the bill, the benefits would be available through any licensed health care clinician anywhere in the United States that is legally qualified to provide the benefits.

Additionally, no deductibles, copayments, coinsurance, or other cost-sharing would be imposed with respect to covered benefits.

No institution may be a participating provider unless it is a public or not-for-profit institution. Private physicians, private clinics, and private health care providers would be allowed to continue to operate as private entities, but would be prohibited from being investor owned.

It would be illegal for a private health insurer to sell health insurance coverage that duplicates the benefits provided under this Act. Health insurance coverage would still be legal for additional benefits not covered by this Act, such as for cosmetic surgery or other services and items that are not medically necessary.

Reimbursement fees and salaries would be determined by the government after “close consultation with the National Board of Universal Quality and Access and regional and State directors.” Initially, the current prevailing fees or reimbursement would be the basis for the fee negotiation for all professional services covered under this Act.

The prices to be paid each year under this Act for covered pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, and medically necessary assistive equipment would be negotiated annually by the Program.

How would this program be paid for?

Mostly by increased taxes, though the amounts have not been outlined. The proposed taxes include:

• Increasing personal e taxes on the top 5 percent e earners.

• Instituting a “modest and progressive” excise tax on payroll and self-employment e.

• Instituting a “modest tax” on unearned e.

• Instituting a “small tax” on stock and bond transactions.

How much would Sanders’s Medicare For All plan cost?

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) hasn’t yet scored the bill, but it is estimated to cost nearly $1.4 trillion a year.

To put that into perspective, that’s more money than bined annual budgets for the Dept. of Agriculture ($133 billion), Dept. of Commerce ($9.28 Billion), Dept. of Defense – military programs ($516 billion), Dept. of Education ($60.2 billion), Dept. of Energy ($26.7 billion), Dept. of Homeland Security ($42 billion), HUD (35.8 billion), Dept. of the Interior ($13.2 billion), Dept. of Justice ($31 billion), Dept. of Labor ($44.8 billion), Dept. of State ($25.4 billion), EPA ($7.65 billion), NASA ($16.9 billion), and all international assistance programs ($23.3 billion).

Also, the total revenue taken in federal taxes is $3.21 trillion a year. To add another $1 trillion—a 31 percent increase—would require raising taxes on nearly every American.

Is there a chance this single-payer bill could e law?

No, at least not while the Republicans control the House, Senate, and the White House. And even if the Democrats were to regain control of Congress in 2018 its unlikely they’d have the votes within their own party to pass the bill.

Comments
Welcome to mreligion comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
RELIGION & LIBERTY ONLINE
The corner on COE
Iain Murray, blogging for The Corner on NRO, has this to say about The Call of the Entrepreneur: I must say [The Call of the Entrepreneur] is the best visual exposition of the moral basis of entrepreneurialism and free enterprise I have ever seen. … By sketching the tales of three men who have taken risks – amazingly big risks in one case – and created not just money but wealth, it underlines the importance of free enterprise to what...
Mothers, Earth
With many developed nations around the world facing demographic crises, Dr. Kevin Schmiesing challenges the radical environmentalist and population control lobbies that view motherhood as a problem. Schmiesing advocates a more positive form of environmental stewardship, arguing that children, far from being an omen of impending catastrophe, have the potential to “generate prosperity, and leave the natural environment better than they found it.” Read mentary here. ...
London premiere confirmed
The London Premiere of the Call of the Entrepreneur has been confirmed — you may RSVP here. This event is sponsored by the Institute for Economic Affairs and will take place at the Cass Business School in London starting at 5:30pm on Wednesday, 20 June, 2007. This event will include refreshments before the film and discussion time and a reception following. Please remember to visit for up-to-date information on premiere locations and times. We will also soon be adding a...
Poverty and the Christian left
There is clearly a “Christian Left” growing among evangelicals in America. We have heard a great deal about the “Christian Right” for more than two decades. I frequently critique this movement unfavorably. But what is the Christian Left? The Christian Left is almost as hard to define, in one certain sense, as the Christian Right. And it is equally hard to tell, at least at this point, how many people actually fit this new designation and just how many potential...
Visit to Project Hope
This morning Karen Weber and I had the pleasure of speaking to a group of pastors and church leaders organized by a local ministry, Project Hope Annetta Jansen Ministries, based in Dorr, Michigan. We were hosted in the group’s new building, which opened late last month. I outlined and summarized some of the basic theological insights and implications for passion, focusing especially on the relationship between and the relative priority of the spiritual over the material. Karen Weber, who is...
Christians for comprehensive immigration reform
A new initiative pioneered by Sojourners/Call to Renewal is called “Christians for Comprehensive Immigration Reform.” Included in the platform are “calls for bills that would push for border enforcement while improving guest worker programs and offering chances for illegal immigrants to obtain legal status,” according to the NYT. The NYT piece points out the potential for this to be a unifying issue for evangelicals, even though few if any prominent politically conservative evangelicals are overtly associated with Christians for Comprehensive...
In defiance of logic and good sense
Last Friday, the New York Times editorialized in critique of American tariffs, which it says “raise the price of goods and are all too often based on outdated political considerations that defy logic and good sense.” Huzzah! ...
Immigration rally gone awry
The nation’s news outlets picked up the story quickly last week out of downtown Los Angeles, where an immigration rally at MacArthur Park sparked a violent police reaction. The LAPD police chief, William J. Bratton, was quick to express his displeasure. “Quite frankly, I was disturbed at what I saw,” Bratton told KNX-AM. He said the actions of some officers “were inappropriate in terms of use of batons and possible use of nonlethal rounds fired.” It looks from reports like...
Global Warming Consensus Watch, Vol. III
e to the latest edition of the PowerBlog’s GLOBAL WARMING CONSENSUS WATCH, a weekly news recap where we highlight the continuing strength and enduring permanence of the universal scientific consensus on the causes and effects of global warming. THIS WEEK: A fungus among us – again; more on Mars; are weather satellites creating more hurricanes?; Live Earth isn’t totally worthless; Laurie David is the GREATEST HERO IN AMERICAN HISTORY; and human sacrifice on the altar of environmental religion. All this...
Good news for the masses
In between jokes, Gore called for a change in thinking about climate issues and the pollution that causes global warming. He was especially critical of the munity’s current focus on quarterly profits at the expense of sustainable business practices. “That’s functionally insane, but that is the dominant reality in the world today,” Gore said. Functionally insane? Found this at EPA today: Since 1970 (the year EPA was established by President Nixon), gross domestic product increased 203 percent, vehicle miles traveled...
Related Classification
Copyright 2023-2026 - www.mreligion.com All Rights Reserved